biggersmaller
Banned
I like the look...it just doesn't scream Mustang to me, which isn't damning - rather disappointing.
eeewwwwwwwwwww
THIS is a MUSTANG.
The window and roof line reminds me of the old Hyundai Tiburons for some reason.
Except some of the new jags look and sound downright beastly.
I like everything but the front of the car.
Looks fantastic.
Engine start is stupidly placed.
I really have to question why anyone would buy a Mustang without a V8 in it. The point of the car is lost entirely without one.
I really have to question why anyone would buy a Mustang without a V8 in it. The point of the car is lost entirely without one.
I really have to question why anyone would buy a Mustang without a V8 in it. The point of the car is lost entirely without one.
the v6 versions of pony cars usually account for half or slightly more than half the sales.
I really have to question why anyone would buy a Mustang without a V8 in it. The point of the car is lost entirely without one.
I really have to question why anyone would buy a Mustang without a V8 in it. The point of the car is lost entirely without one.
Too many curves? Not enough strong lines? Doesn't give that old-school Mustang-vibe?
I really have to question why anyone would buy a Mustang without a V8 in it. The point of the car is lost entirely without one.
Could someone please articulate why they think this car is so ugly?
I was thinking it looks more like a Maserati, just not as nice:
I really have to question why anyone would buy a Mustang without a V8 in it. The point of the car is lost entirely without one.
This is a pretty absurd POV. There are legitimate reasons for preferring a larger displacement motor with more torque that runs at lower compression ratios on shitty fuel to a smaller high revving motor.
This is coming from someone who drives an FR-S, which is about the polar opposite of that, but I'm not going to put someone down or suggest that they are stupid because they like the feel of a big lazy engine as opposed to a small rev happy engine.
Unless you live in the middle of nowhere or something.
Nobody likes the "feel" of a V6, it's the most vanilla engine there is...flat- and inline-sixes are a different story. In this case it actually has less torque and let's be honest here...getting 305hp out of a 3.7 liter engine is embarrassing 90s engineering, even when it comes to naturally aspirated engines.
I like pony cars, but they're clearly developed by lackadaisical engineers for the most ignorant customers in the world. I'm guess having a fucking live axle in a sports car will finally be a thing of the past in 2014, but I still won't be able to buy this in good conscience. A small turbocharged I4 is wrong in a pony car, there's no way they're shipping that retarded 3.7 liter V6 to Europe and a 5.0 liter V8 just isn't worth the running costs. They could easily make a tremendous car by putting the V6 they're selling to Jaguar in there, but American car makers still don't seem to get it.
Ford does not own Jaguar or Aston anymore. Jaguar is owned by an Indian company which I find HILARIOUS.