-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
7 New Forza Screens on IGN?
- Thread starter aaaaa0
- Start date
Littleberu
Banned
"WOW. Nice looking ground texture!!!"
"Where are the gameplay screens?"
"It's never gonna look like that on your TV. I played it at E3, I know everything."
"Can my driver be killed in this game? It's not realist if I can't be killed..."
"Where are the gameplay screens?"
"It's never gonna look like that on your TV. I played it at E3, I know everything."
"Can my driver be killed in this game? It's not realist if I can't be killed..."
Littleberu
Banned
DCX said:
It's not even on the same console damnit. And GT is in another league anyway. Any TRUE racing game fans are gonna get GT4 and this I suppose.
seismologist
Banned
I never understood people who own like 10 car racing games.
It's like the same crowd who keeps re-buying Madden every year.
1 sim racer is enough for me. And that one is F355 challenge.
It's like the same crowd who keeps re-buying Madden every year.
1 sim racer is enough for me. And that one is F355 challenge.
Suikoguy
I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
seismologist said:I never understood people who own like 10 car racing games.
It's like the same crowd who keeps re-buying Madden every year.
1 sim racer is enough for me. And that one is F355 challenge.
Its called new tracks/cars better graphics
Blazing Sword
Member
where's OsamaGT(alphasnake) to instantly write off these screens as craptacular and claim GT 4 as the only true driving game that can possibly exist, like usual?
Be how do you plan on dividing your time between this, OutRun 2 and Burnout 3?
By the way how often do you still play RSC2? I want to buy it but can't for like another month
Hmm, I wouldn't go THAT far... That honor is going to OR2 or BO 3!
By the way how often do you still play RSC2? I want to buy it but can't for like another month
BeOnEdge said:
Hmm, I wouldn't go THAT far... That honor is going to OR2 or BO 3!
this is pathetic...but expected
Forza fans mention GT and will eventually get pissed at the thread going off topic....what else is new?
[edit]If you want your threads to stop turning into pissing fights against GT fans, then stop actively comparing the two![/edit]
btw, new desktop GET
[edit]The game really does look amazing, the reflections in particular stand out as top-notch![/edit]
Forza fans mention GT and will eventually get pissed at the thread going off topic....what else is new?
[edit]If you want your threads to stop turning into pissing fights against GT fans, then stop actively comparing the two![/edit]
btw, new desktop GET
[edit]The game really does look amazing, the reflections in particular stand out as top-notch![/edit]
u_neek said:
Teh next gen gfx (it will NEVER look like this when it's released, just compare GT4 Prologue with the touched-up official screenshots)
Exactly. Just like these very early pics of PGR2.
The game I am playing on my TV certainly doesn`t look as good and detailed as this. The 30fps isn`t helping though, as 30fps always kills graphical detail when in motion making things look blurry.
Forza better be 60fps, or it will just be another PGR2 flop. Atleast in my eyes.
DemonCleaner
Member
gregory is right,
the texture detail of the environment isnt nearly as good in the game,
as in the bizarre released screens. but the game looks good imo...
the only problem is: IT SUCKS. last generation racer >>>> this gen
the texture detail of the environment isnt nearly as good in the game,
as in the bizarre released screens. but the game looks good imo...
the only problem is: IT SUCKS. last generation racer >>>> this gen
eso76
Member
u_neek said:
Teh next gen gfx (it will NEVER look like this when it's released, just compare GT4 Prologue with the touched-up official screenshots)
Ps2's IQ was never that good to begin with, games often output at sub 640x480 res with visible interlacing and heavy jaggies.
Actually GT3 (haven't seen prologue) was one of the best games on Ps2 IQ wise; not too different from official screenshots at all, in motion. Sure 60fps helped a lot making it look cleaner, but I always wonder what kind of tv sets you use over there.
HDTV ? Plasma ? Lcd ? Dunno, but whatever it is, it really doesn't get along well with videogames.
Anyway, while Ps2 has its issues with IQ the same can't be said for the Xbox, which outputs a much crisper 640x480 image.
As for those PGR2 shots...again what the hell are you using to connect your consoles and to what kind of tv sets ? My copy of PGR2 actually looks better than this (i think these are from an older build; lightning has improved since these pics). I agree that 30 fps made it look blurrier in motion (that's the main reason why i am *totally* against 30fps in supposedly fast moving games) but the IQ wasn't different at all.
I will tell you one thing if you think PGR2 looks shit in motion you should play Prologue. Yep its smoother (not that I can really tell) but a lot of the tracks look very messy especially NY which shimmers like mad and popup is very evident. PGR2 IMO is the best looking racer to date and the IQ is second to none. Oh it also looks great in motion.
Pug said:
It has nothing to do with the image quality, textures, or anything similar. The way the cars look as they drive around the track and the way the game actually moves just doesn't look very impressive. GT3 is technically below it, but I still feel that it looks much better in motion.
30 fps is a major part of that, but it has a lot to do with the car physics used for the game.
I dunno, I just wasn't impressed with most of the game. The only thing that WAS impressive was the extremely crisp image quality. It isn't as if the game looks bad from a design standpoint (screens look great and the actual models, textures, and other assets are great), but it just doesn't impress in motion.
