To be honest, Emilia Clarke, as cute as she is, isn't helping Dany one bit.
I don't know what it is about her acting, but her Dany just comes off entirely smug and offputting instead of empowered.
To be honest, Emilia Clarke, as cute as she is, isn't helping Dany one bit.
I don't know what it is about her acting, but her Dany just comes off entirely smug and offputting instead of empowered.
I agree with this 100%. I don't mean to insult her because she seems like a really nice woman and she's absolutely gorgeous, but her interpretation of Dany on the show has made me despise the character. She's a cliche black and white character in a world full of gray characters. She's the beautiful girl who is royalty "by rights" but instead goes through hardship and starts from dirt. She starts from scratch and being abused, then amasses an army and just so happens to have crystal clear morals and turn into the great liberator of slaves. In the show she's portrayed as being so morally pure and badass. That's never the vibe I got from her in the books. While she may be making the same basic decisions, it's the way she arrives at them and acts in the show that rubs me the wrong way. Like you said, she's so smug. She acts like she's some brilliant, all knowing, unstoppable force. It's like she's adopted part of her brother's personality in the show. The arrogance of being an all mighty Targaryen.
I don't like Dany in the books (mostly the last one).
Clarke may not have incredible range or deliver every line at Oscar level quality, but she does a great job of embodying that character, she gives the character a presence.
How can you say one of the most entertaining characters in the series is boring?
Tyrion's height is greater than Stannis' character growth through five books. Even Daenerys can recognize "shit, I need to learn how to rule a continent, I'll rule this city to get experience".How can you say one of the most entertaining characters in the series is boring?
How can you say one of the most entertaining characters in the series is boring?
Tyrion's height is greater than Stannis' character growth through five books. Even Danaerys can recognize "shit, I need to learn how to rule a continent, I'll rule this city to get experience".
I know. "He's iron who will break before bending" and all that. Doesn't mean that his lack of change does not make him boring and predictable. The most growth he's shown was when Davos convinced him to go The Wall, the one unpredictable thing he's done.You better be talking about Stannis.
That's the point, he's an ice-cold badass with a sharp wit. He doesn't change.
Tyrion's height is greater than Stannis' character growth through five books. Even Daenerys can recognize "shit, I need to learn how to rule a continent, I'll rule this city to get experience".
You better be talking about Stannis.
Careful now, careful. "Mothers milk is all they share. Gillys son is larger and more robust. He kicks the prince and pinches him, and shoves him from the breast. Craster was his father, a cruel man and greedy, and blood tells."
The king was confused. "I thought the wet nurse was this man Crasters daughter?"
"Wife and daughter both, Your Grace. Craster married all his daughters. Gillys boy was the fruit of their union."
"Her own father got this child on her?" Stannis sounded shocked. "We are well rid of her, then. I will not suffer such abominations here. This is not Kings Landing."
They could introduce him next season.So is Coldhands not going to be in the show at all? They could've put another supernatural cliffhanger by introducing him in episode 10 but nope.
I disagree in that case.She has a presence, but I think what some of us are saying is...It's the wrong presence.
I'd second the theory that Patchface is up to no good. I actually think he's in Leauge with the demon that controls the Others.
So is Coldhands not going to be in the show at all? They could've put another supernatural cliffhanger by introducing him in episode 10 but nope.
It feels almost like they ran out of money by the end of season 3 and so decided to forego that part. What I miss most is the black gate and the talking door or whatever it was. Yeah they pretty much have butchered the Jon Snow/Bran story for me.
I am not sure what they are planning for season 4. I think it will be like filler with Bran travelling around the wildling areas until they meet Coldhands. I am not sure why they went so fast with the Jon and Bran stuff. I would have liked to see a bigger wilding camp and Jon living among them while Bran just hangs out with Jojen and Meera. The final shot of the season could have been Jon climbing the Wall and staring out at those green hills like he did in that earlier episode.
What I miss most is the black gate and the talking door or whatever it was.
The New Gods vs. the Old: Is Game of Thrones Better As a Show or a Series of Books?: http://www.grantland.com/blog/holly...thrones-better-as-a-show-or-a-series-of-books
I agree with this but we have the added knowledge of knowing that the show could be better.Man I don't get how people see the TV show as being on The Wire or Breaking Bad's level.
Yeah, it makes me sad to think of all the stories they'll miss out on.Show watchers have no idea what kind of person Rhaegar Targaryen was and have never even heard of Ser Arthur Dayne. They lose.
They'll never get to see Dany nearly shit herself to death.
They'll never get to see Dany nearly shit herself to death.
Yeah I assumed that as well.I assume they shot it like that becuse Isaac Hempstead-wright is getting too big fo Kristian Nairn to carry and they needed to show that the cart went through the gate as well.
While I agree keep in mind that it's a totally different experience for people that haven't read the books. I read the books after season one, and that back half of season one was one of the most nail-biting visceral experiences I've seen in recent TV memory (back half of season 4 of Breaking Bad obviously comes to mind as well). Of course since then I read the books, and I enjoy the hell out of the show, but it's from a different perspective.Man I don't get how people see the TV show as being on The Wire or Breaking Bad's level.
If you've read the books, you aren't in any position to judge the quality of the TV show. The twists, turns and tension just aren't there for you in the same way as they are for show watchers.
Sorry.
If you've read the books, you aren't in any position to judge the quality of the TV show. The twists, turns and tension just aren't there for you in the same way as they are for show watchers.
Sorry.
That's bullshit. Book readers get to see the show from a totally different perspective and are perfectly able to judge the quality of the work.
I agree completely.Yes, we can judge the quality of the work, but not the suspense. Consider the 6th Sense. If you know the twist before it happens, the it changes the experience of the movie. The same for the show if you've read the books. You are watching for different things and different payoffs. Both readers and watchers can judge the quality of the writing, acting, etc, but only the watchers can truly judge the quality of the experience as a whole, as they also have the advantage of being surprised by things, whereas the readers know what is coming.
The show introduced me to the books and I still think they are vastly superior experience. The pacing of the show is oftentimes broken
The show introduced me to the books and I still think they are vastly superior experience. The pacing of the show is oftentimes broken