LMAO I laughed way harder at this than I should.The Night
Am I the only one who didn't have a problem with Darkstar's character? I mean we don't even know anything about the guy.
LMAO I laughed way harder at this than I should.The Night
LMAO I laughed way harder at this than I should.
Am I the only one who didn't have a problem with Darkstar's character? I mean we don't even know anything about the guy.
I think Darkstar being a laughable idiot is explanation enough. Probably thought killing an unarmed girl would make him better than Arthur Dayne somehow.
I really don't understand why Darkstar tried to kill Myrcella, though. "Instigating a war between Dorne and the Iron Throne" doesn't make much sense, as he has no motivation to do so. Was he working for someone?
Pretty shocked tbh that I've never seen a comprehensive fan theory stating that Darkstar is going to be the new Night's King. I will remedy this sometime soon.
Pretty shocked tbh that I've never seen a comprehensive fan theory stating that Darkstar is going to be the new Night's King. I will remedy this sometime soon.
I figure Gerold will steal Dawn thinking it'll make him the greatest warrior in the world before getting cut to ribbons. Not sure how his story will go down though with Hoah being the only POV left in Dorne.
So, I've decided to really delve into the whole "What is Lightbringer?" As I seriously doubt it's an actual sword. I've now put those thoughts down in a lentghy Reddi post:
http://www.reddit.com/r/asoiaf/comments/2a2gpv/spoilers_all_lightbringer_and_the_bible_what_is/
What do you think? Do you actually believe Lightbringer to be a sword or something else?
Now, what is helpful in understanding this myth and prophecy is one of the greatest books of myth and prophecy, the Bible.
I really liked this sentence:
The Bible: maybe you've heard of it.
ASIDEThe Revelation is the thugginest thing ever written. "He treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty. On his robe and on his thigh he has this name written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS...".
As to the post, I think you're definitely right that Lightbringer doesn't refer to a literal sword--or at least that it wasn't the sword that delivered the day. I like bringing the Drowned God into it, maybe even Lann (even though barely even in the books), but the Westeros thing is a bit of a stretch. Also the metaphor doesn't hold very well. If we're reading "tempering" as "beseeching for aid" then what dingus goes first to Dagon and then, finding That Deep Power wanting, goes next to A Pretty Clever Dude?
Also the connection to Revelation is totally unnecessary to any of this and doesn't reveal anything except that sometimes "sword" is a metaphor, which like: yeah.
Chuck me in with the Lightbringer = Night's Watch crowd.
"I am the sword in the darkness. I am the watcher on the walls. I am the fire that burns against the cold, the light that brings the dawn"
Forged by killing wife/love = Vow of celibacy.
Wielded by AA = Commanded by AA.
Maybe you're just taking the prophecy to literally? If the wife is just symbolic then the water & Lion could be as well.
But, that's what I mean. If the Night's Watch is Lightbringer why did he fail in trying to create it through "water" and "capturing a lion?" What do they stand in for in helping create the Night's Watch?
Is there an article or concrete info on the time skip that didn't happen? I'd love to read about it.
http://io9.com/george-r-r-martin-answers-our-toughest-song-of-ice-and-886133300Q: I'm obsessed with the five-year gap you originally planned in the middle of the series. How would that have happened?
Martin: Originally, there was not supposed to be any gap. There was just supposed to be a passage of time as the book went forward. My original concept back in 1991 was, I would start with these characters as children, and they would get older. If you pick up Arya at eight, the second chapter would be a couple months later, and she would be eight and a half and [then] she'd be nine. [This would happen] all within the space of a book.
But when I actually got into writing them, the events have a certain momentum. So you write a chapter and then in your next chapter, it can't be six months later, because something's going to happen the next day. So you have to write what happens the next day, and then you have to write what happens the week after that. And the news gets to some other place.
And pretty soon, you've written hundreds of pages and a week has passed, instead of the six months, or the year that you wanted to pass. So you end a book, and you've had a tremendous amount of events — but they've taken place over a short time frame, and the eight-year-old kid is still eight years old.
So that really took hold of me for the first three books. When it became apparent that that had taken hold of me, I came up with the idea of the five year gap. "Time is not passing here as I want it to pass, so I will jump forward five years in time." And I will come back to these characters when they're a little more grown up. And that is what I tried to do when I started writing Feast for Crows. So [the gap] would have come after A Storm of Swords and before Feast for Crows.
But what I soon discovered — and I struggled with this for a year — [the gap] worked well with some characters like Arya — who at end the of Storm of Swords has taken off for Braavos. You can come back five years later, and she has had five years of training and all that. Or Bran, who was taken in by the Children of the Forest and the green ceremony, [so you could] come back to him five years later. That’s good. Works for him.
Other characters, it didn’t work at all. I'm writing the Cersei chapters in King's Landing, and saying, "Well yeah, in five years, six different guys have served as Hand and there was this conspiracy four years ago, and this thing happened three years ago." And I'm presenting all of this in flashbacks, and that wasn't working. The other alternative was [that] nothing happened in those six years, which seemed anticlimactic. The Jon Snow stuff was even worse, because at the end of Storm he gets elected Lord Commander. I'm picking up there, and writing 'Well five years ago, I was elected Lord Commander. Nothing much has happened since then, but now things are starting to happen again." I finally, after a year, said, "I can't make this work."
Was it going to be five years and then Winter was going to arrive or was it going to be during Winter?
Martin: No, it wasn’t going to be during Winter. The arrival of Winter which would have been on stage.
So, like another five years of Fall?
Martin: Yeah. There is plenty of precedent for that [in] the way I set up the series. Summer lasted ten years. A five-year Fall [is] nothing much.
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/George_R._R._MartinBack at the Philadelphia Worldcon (which seems a million years ago), I announced the famous five-year gap: I was going to skip five years forward in the story, to allow some of the younger characters to grow older and the dragons to grow larger, and for various other reasons. I started out writing on that basis in 2001, and it worked very well for some of my myriad characters but not at all for others, because you can't just have nothing happen for five years. If things do happen you have to write flashbacks, a lot of internal retrospection, and that's not a good way to present it. I struggled with that essentially wrong direction for about a year before finally throwing it out, realizing there had to be another interim book. That became A Feast for Crows, where the action is pretty much continuous from the preceding book. Even so, that only accounts for one year. Why the four after that? I don't know, except that this was a very tough book to write -- and it remains so, because I've only finished half. Going in, I thought I could do something about the length of the second book in the series, A Clash of Kings, roughly 1,200 pages in manuscript. But I passed that and there was a lot more to write. Then I passed the length of the third book, A Storm of Swords, which was something like 1,500 pages in manuscript and gave my publishers all around the world lots of production problems. I didn't really want to make any cuts because I had this huge story to tell. We started thinking about dividing it in two and doing it as A Feast for Crows, Parts One and Two, but the more I thought about that the more I really did not like it. Part One would have had no resolution whatsoever for 18 viewpoint characters and their 18 stories. Of course this is all part of a huge megaseries so there is not a complete resolution yet in any of the volumes, but I try to give a certain sense of completion at the end of each volume -- that a movement of the symphony has wrapped up, so to speak.
Huge LoK fan, but I never made the connection between the two. Can you elaborate? Is it just the vampire appearance? Haha.Finished the Dunk & Egg novellas. There were really fun reads, although the last one ended quite abruptly.
I find the character of Brynden Rivers to be very interesting. Maybe it's because he reminds me of Kain from the Legacy of Kain games. Looking forward to see what he does in TWOW.
Huge LoK fan, but I never made the connection between the two. Can you elaborate? Is it just the vampire appearance? Haha.
Prediction: Patchface kills Shireen, thus ending the Baratheon right to the Iron Throne (Stannis will surely go at some point).
http://io9.com/george-r-r-martin-answers-our-toughest-song-of-ice-and-886133300
That's one of Martin's most comprehensive interviews. He also goes into detail on why he chose to split the books, and his argument for why it was the right decision; he also acknowledges that some fans disagree/disliked AFFC and ADWD.
another:
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/George_R._R._Martin
]
That makes the five-year gap a more stupid idea than I thought. How can you spend a year on that without quickly realizing it's not going to work?
That makes the five-year gap a more stupid idea than I thought. How can you spend a year on that without quickly realizing it's not going to work?
He described his writing process the same way in the 90s, it's not something he just made up all of a sudden. There's nothing imaginary about his struggles these past 14 years. And he wasn't famous when this started. His books weren't even huge sellers until AFFC and it wasn't until ADWD and the TV show that he moved into the real top tier of fantasy sellers. He was hardly a celebrity in the early 2000s when this started.Ever get the feeling it's all bullshit? That he is purposely writing slowly to drag out the series' fame and payday? How convenient that he had no problem with a book per year until it started to get famous and get TV and film offers. Then all of a sudden, he's a gardener, not an architect.
Maybe I'm just jaded.
That makes the five-year gap a more stupid idea than I thought. How can you spend a year on that without quickly realizing it's not going to work?
If this happens, the throne should pass by all rights to Aegon (if he is authentic), then Jon (if he is legitimate), and then Daenerys. I think the Targaryens might reclaim their kingdom through succession, not force.
Maybe I'm just jaded.
If I were GRRM... seeing the millions of people that are counting on me to absolutely stick the landing on one of the most influential fantasy works since fucking Tolkien, I would be pissing myself six ways from Sunday.
Spoilers for TWOW, if you haven't read the Mercy chapter:That chapter was originally intended to be Arya's first post 5 Year Gap chapter. Martin changed it to reflect her current age, but originally that was a 15-16 year old Arya wrecking shit. I know some fans have said the chapter feels weird because Arya seems older than when we last saw her, but Martin has argued that it's because she's wearing the face of an older girl. I think another issue is that remnants of the original chapter's spirit/feel remain.
Oh, jeez. Here I was thinking he'd written a super interesting chapter post-DWD. :|
Ever get the feeling it's all bullshit? That he is purposely writing slowly to drag out the series' fame and payday? How convenient that he had no problem with a book per year until it started to get famous and get TV and film offers. Then all of a sudden, he's a gardener, not an architect.
Maybe I'm just jaded.
It's mainly the appearance (and the fact that they both are beyond human), but also the fact that they both rule through terror but are really intelligent and ultimately can be viewed as good guys as long as you are on their respective sides. Bloodraven is a nightmare for the rebels, but a hero for the Targs who takes care of his own very well (he is very loyal and he was pretty nice towards Dunk when disguised as Maynard Plumm). Kain is a tyrant to the humans but a real hero to the vampires who saves their kind from extinction.
Also the conversation between Dunk and Bloodraven at the end kind of reminded me of him as well, he was pretty snarky, confident and mysterious in a Kain-like way IMO.
Although it's been a long time since I played the LoK games so maybe just his appearance is driving this comparison.
. Hes sold the rights to HBO, he says, and while he consults (and even writes an occasional episode), he technically has no say in what HBO does with the series going forward.
In an interview with Swiss newspaper Tagesanzeiger this week, George R. R. Martin who is 65 years old displayed some anger at those who express doubt that hell be able to finish the Song of Fire and Ice series due to his age and health. I find that question pretty offensive, he said. So f**k you to those people, Martin retorted, throwing up a middle finger.
In the interview, Martin also took umbrage with fans who complain that he attends events, like football games, or screenings, or travels instead of writing, though he also notes that he only writes at home. He will not write in hotels. Or on trains. Or in planes. So, anytime hes away from home, hes not writing (and because of publicity commitments to the HBO series, he is often away from home).
No. He still doesnt know when the next book will be ready, though he also admitted in the interview that he writes slower these days. Some of that is age, while part of it is because he has to deal with merchandizing, the show, the video game, and speaking to journalists all the damn time.
However, as hes noted before, he knows how the book series will end. David Benioff and Dan Weiss (showrunners of the HBO series) also know how it will end, although they do not necessarily need to follow Martins conclusion. Hes sold the rights to HBO, he says, and while he consults (and even writes an occasional episode), he technically has no say in what HBO does with the series going forward.
I would have required having a degree of control over the adaption of my work in the contract.
George R.R. Martin recently appeared at the Neuchâtel International Fantastic Film Festival in Switzerland, where he held a masterclass to discuss his work. The event was livestreamed, and is now available for replay. During the conversation, Martin talks at length about science fiction, developing ones writing skills, heroes, love, feminism, and much more. The end of the session included a Q&A with the audience, and some fans were eager to ask questions about Game of Thrones.
The session begins about 24 minutes into the video, and the Q&A begins at 1 hour and 8 minutes:
I'm going to have to go with option B.OK guys, what's the consensus here:
A) The magic came back into the world because the dragons came back
or
B) The dragons came back because the magic came back into the world.
I´m thinking of the scene in Quarth with the fire mage and the cutpurses, where GRRM describes how the magic is getting stronger by the day, and I wonder why that is.
I'm going to have to go with option B.