Incandenza
Banned
Also Dangerous Women for "The Princess and the Queen" and Rogues for "The Rogue Prince," if you want those too.
What books do I need to buy to read the novellas?
Unfortunately I had Stoneheart spoiled for me by a rogue post in the no-spoiler tv show thread a while ago, but I marked out anyway when I read it actually happening. Zombie Cat! How is that not awesome? Having said that, I did not appreciate her treatment of Brienne.
Having just finished the books, I feel as though I have a lot I could write here, but it's all kind of overwhelming. Now that I've had the chance to delve into it all without having to worry about spoilers, there's even more questions I want to ask. Like, hundreds of questions.
I'll start with one: Do we know that Ramsay's letter to Bastard was for real?
Edit: Also, how many times have you guys read these?
You don't even know what their role in the overarching plot is in the books.
I like that. It's such a bad move to change things just because people figured out whatever it is. Especially if the clues and hints are clever and it was well thought out. Of course you should execute on your vision.Here's the quote from the Telegraph report:Too many monkeys with too many typewriters on 'the boards', and all of the sudden Euron is Daario.
I must have been confused what thread I was in when I posted that.They've already published the first three Dunk & Egg tales in one single book here in Brazil. I have it in two different sizes, haha. Love the characters.
That's what I meant
I guess I can see Jaime finishing his redemption path by assuming the position of Valonqar and killing Cersei, but I can't say I see how Brienne's POV could end in anything that isn't a senseless death.
Here's the quote from the Telegraph report:Too many monkeys with too many typewriters on 'the boards', and all of the sudden Euron is Daario.
A lot of writing work actually involves using characters or settings you didn't originally create.I'm probably going to get a huge amount of shit for this, but I'm opposed to fan fiction, too. My stance is that in writing it you're squandering your own talent as a writer while simultaneously bastardizing someone else's work and world.
If you're a good writer, create!
A lot if writing work actually involves using characters or settings you didn't originally create.
I find his attitude toward science fiction a bit disingenuous given his outspoken criticism of fan fiction. As fan fiction is treated about as seriously as pulpy science fiction was in the 1950s, he ought to have far more empathy for fan fiction writers. He needs to realize than fanfic hurts nobody and can make a work of published fiction much more enjoyable.
His claims that people make money off of fanfic or that fanfic writers accuse published authors of plagiarism is ludicrous. One writer's poor reaction to a douchey fan is absolutely not enough to disregard an entire category of fiction. It's just as ridiculous to act like fan fiction writers are doing it for any reason other than their own practice and enjoyment. While I don't read much fanfic myself, a huge amount is of a very high quality.
Often, fanfic can lead people to discover a work. I'm absolutely positive that some fans of BBC's Sherlock only became interested after reading sexy Cumberbatch stories. Other fanfic (for instance, Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality) can lead to intriguing discussion between fans about the original work.
I'm curious if his derision of fanfic is his way of speaking ill of J.K. Rowling by proxy, as she's very vocal about her encouragement of the art. He's very bitter about the Hugo award she won, and rightfully peeved about a few patronizing comments she made about the genre of fantasy.
I don't understand this response, of course writers working with pre-existing characters and settings use the same names and appearances.Obviously, but not with the same names and appearances.
I don't mind fanfiction on a theoretical level, my problem with it is that it's mostly just poorly written and bad. GRRM's stance is really paranoid though, and I'm not sure anyone who wants to create fanfiction should really care what he says about it. It's not something he really has the power to control in any case, and I'm glad that's how it is, as long as people aren't making money off of it, they should write whatever fanfiction they want to.I'm not too fond of fan fiction either, but mainly because I'm addicted to the whole canon thing. I really like to enter the worlds the creators come up with and live there for a while, so reading/watching non-canon stuff always feels like a waste of time.
It's weird, I know.
I don't understand this response, of course writers working with pre-existing characters and settings use the same names and appearances.
I have a feeling you may draw this into an endless loop. What I meant was that yes, all writers of fiction take attributes and characteristics from pre-existing characters, and mesh them together to create their own, new characters. That's a given. But if some fan-fiction writers are genuinely good and creative writers, then why waste time messing around in someone else's universe? Especially if the owner/creator of said universe is outspoken against fan-fiction?
And yes, the comic book card may be coming next, in that comic writers utilise pre-existing characters down to the letter. I know that. But that's clearly not the same thing.
Anyway, I don't want to derail the thread with this nonsense. My bottom line is, I don't like the concept of fan-fiction, and respect Martin's outspoken views on the matter.
Pretty sure GRRM has been opposing fan fiction long before JK Rowling was a thing. I don't blame him, I wouldn't want people to play with my creation either. If some authors allow it, then that's one thing, but if someone knows the author is opposed and still goes through with it, s/he's kind of a disrespectful ass.
It's about having control over your creation.Is there any harm done by fan fiction, though? It's the literary equivalent of drawing a picture of your favorite comic book characters fighting each other. I'm not sure why the author's opinion on fanfic is relevant. Fans should be able to express their appreciation for a work in any way that pleases them, as long as nobody is being hurt.
Is there any harm done by fan fiction, though? It's the literary equivalent of drawing a picture of your favorite comic book characters fighting each other. I'm not sure why the author's opinion on fanfic is relevant. Fans should be able to express their appreciation for a work in any way that pleases them, as long as nobody is being hurt.
Hell, most of the Bible itself is fanfic and adaptation and thinly-veiled homage. GRR is wrong on this: any creativity is good. There's clearly a class of schlock fanfic, but so what?
Exactly.The authors opinion, or shall we say, stance, on the matter is relevant to themselves because obviously they have to maintain the integrity and copyright of their work. Its just the way it works. Not sure why you are getting all up in arms about it though. Seems to me that someone writing and publishing fanfics will do so either way with little care of the authors opinions, if they are even aware them to begin with.
So GRRM doesn't embrace with a warm hug those pure-hearted souls who genuinely wish to express their appreciation by distributing ( without consent ) derivative work of his livelihood across the webs. Boo fucking hoo. I am sure they'll manage.
Wrong on what? Is he wrong trying to protect the copyright of his creation? Somehow I think not. As for homages, thinly veiled or not, I am sure GRRM support those as much as the next author.
The authors opinion, or shall we say, stance, on the matter is relevant to themselves because obviously they have to maintain the integrity and copyright of their work. Its just the way it works. Not sure why you are getting all up in arms about it though. Seems to me that someone writing and publishing fanfics will do so either way with little care of the authors opinions, if they are even aware them to begin with.
So GRRM doesn't embrace with a warm hug those pure-hearted souls who genuinely wish to express their appreciation by distributing ( without consent ) derivative work of his livelihood across the webs. Boo fucking hoo. I am sure they'll manage.
Wrong on what? Is he wrong trying to protect the copyright of his creation? Somehow I think not. As for homages, thinly veiled or not, I am sure GRRM support those as much as the next author.
"protect the copyright"? How do you figure fanfic even hurts the copyright?
The authors opinion, or shall we say, stance, on the matter is relevant to themselves because obviously they have to maintain the integrity and copyright of their work. Its just the way it works. Not sure why you are getting all up in arms about it though. Seems to me that someone writing and publishing fanfics will do so either way with little care of the authors opinions, if they are even aware them to begin with.
So GRRM doesn't embrace with a warm hug those pure-hearted souls who genuinely wish to express their appreciation by distributing ( without consent ) derivative work of his livelihood across the webs. Boo fucking hoo. I am sure they'll manage.
Wrong on what? Is he wrong trying to protect the copyright of his creation? Somehow I think not. As for homages, thinly veiled or not, I am sure GRRM support those as much as the next author.
Sonic.
The.
Hedge knight.
Sonic.
The.
Hedge knight.
There's probably some interesting legal territory you could get into if you really wanted. Can you trademark a fictional family? A fictional city? A fictional castle?
Is there any known theory as to what Qyburn might be or might want? Am I paranoid after too much ASOIAF?
Copyright isn't just about financial protection, it's about creative control. If the author doesn't want someone to be touching their work in any way, that's their prerogative."protect the copyright"? How do you figure fanfic even hurts the copyright?
Furry blue mast.Sonic.
The.
Hedge knight.
Nope. That's why we have fair use, which I think most fanfic would fall under.Copyright isn't just about financial protection, it's about creative control. If the author doesn't want someone to be touching their work in any way, that's their prerogative.
I've been re-reading AFFC and something struck my mind: Qyburn. I mean, I get that he wants to experiment and continue his studies, and what better way to do so that with limitless funds from stupid Cersei, but... he is there at the right time, at the right place and he wastes no time to get what he wants (I'm refering to when he makes the "pact" with Cersei after Tywin's death). It's all too convenient and he gets his way too easily. I get the impression that he has to have a secret agenda and that he is working for someone.
He went from almost a beggar at the service of the Goat to basically grand maester of the Kingdom in a flash. I'm guessing when Tarly arrives to put order there (I'm dying to see that) he will be of the first to go, and I want to see his reaction to that.
Is there any known theory as to what Qyburn might be or might want? Am I paranoid after too much ASOIAF?
How do you figure fanfic is fair use? The only time it might make sense is parody, and that's a stretch, since most parodies are fairly short in nature and aren't a full story.Nope. That's why we have fair use, which I think most fanfic would fall under.
George RR Martin is apparently considering releasing a canned but finished chapter from Dance as a short story.
I've heard he wrote two Arya chapters that never saw the light of day, but still liked them quite a bit.
Fanfic can't always be considered fair use, true:How do you figure fanfic is fair use? The only time it might make sense is parody, and that's a stretch, since most parodies are fairly short in nature and aren't a full story.
He's referring to a Tyrion chapter he has mentioned many times. In the published chapter, Tyrion falls off the Shy Main during the stone men attack, and is later saved by Jon Connington. In the original chapter Tyrion falls off the ship and winds up stranded in the Sorrows, then is taken by stone men to meet the Shrouded Lord. Martin said it was a dead end because he couldn't figure out a decent, timely way to get Tyrion back into the overall story.
Huh. I was under the impression that the Shrouded Lord was a mythical character, like those of the Seven?
I'd love to see what that chapter would have entailed.
He's referring to a Tyrion chapter he has mentioned many times. In the published chapter, Tyrion falls off the Shy Main during the stone men attack, and is later saved by Jon Connington. In the original chapter Tyrion falls off the ship and winds up stranded in the Sorrows, then is taken by stone men to meet the Shrouded Lord. Martin said it was a dead end because he couldn't figure out a decent, timely way to get Tyrion back into the overall story.