ValiantInstance
Member
My 7900XT hit 55-60 at 4K, so I presume it would be better.for me I want to see Witcher 3 RT performance. the RT implementation in that game drastically improves the look, so I want to see how the 9070 XT fares.
My 7900XT hit 55-60 at 4K, so I presume it would be better.for me I want to see Witcher 3 RT performance. the RT implementation in that game drastically improves the look, so I want to see how the 9070 XT fares.
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9070 XT - 689,00
Pot-kettle, take a look back at response #95It sure does
Least of worries for these gens of cards is fucking raster at >150 fps
It does. Max setting path tracing baseline can be optimized further with tweaks to hit 60 fps with DLSS. Frame gen can also go in and AMD has it. This is the type of game that frame-gen is totally justifiable for a generational leap in graphics.
Even better at 1440p which these mid range cards should actually target.
That's like your opinion, and I really don't give a shit about it.
7900XTX were benched for it. Why the fuck not the new gen? It has to show a substantial boost.
Wow, don't forget to take your pills. Where the fuck am I saying that there's no point to these reviews because path tracing? Calm the fuck down.
I'm flabbergasted that not a single reviewer has it. Like I don't care if hardware unboxed doesn't or gamers nexus, because they never cared for these tech, but all of them? I call bullshit.
Take your meds
Plenty of ways to make cyberpunk path tracing viable
Even I can run it on a 3080 Ti. Surely a 9070 XT beats my card?
- 1440p would be 100% viable
- Tweaking under max settings is viable
- Frame gen is viable, AMD has it, use it. Don't care about the whole fake frame fucking drama for brainlets
- Upscaling performance
If its 30 fps? So fucking be it! Who the fuck are you to judge what is acceptable. Who the fuck are you?
The purpose of reviews is to inform users and they did a shit job by neglecting the most demanding titles.
SolidQ had a leaked benchmark of it in path tracing and it looked promising, I even said so in the reply to him. So again, GTFO with your baseless accusations.
I think there is, just no founded. Let's see tomorrowWhere are the pulse 9070 prices?
Looks to be about 40-50% in RT games and 30ish percent in vanilla uplift.Very interesting reviews. I'm wondering if it would be worth upgrading from a 3080 10GB to the 9070XT and if I'll really see any real world differences.
AMD always after release improve RT perf, let's see how it's turn in 6 month. on RDNA3 in latest driver(RDNA4) they improve RTLooks to be about 40-50% in RT games and 30ish percent in vanilla uplift.
Oh, sure, but I am not going to wait to buy if I can get one tomorrow. I suspect prices are going to go up with these dumb tariffs in US.AMD always after release improve RT perf, let's see how it's turn in 6 month. on RDNA3 in latest driver(RDNA4) they improve RT
yeah it's going upI suspect prices are going to go up with these dumb tariffs in US.
yeah outside US, but i'm not hurry, i stil have games which, i can play it on old card. Will see in autumn, maybe will get 9070nonXT(i'm don't like cards above 250W)If you are outside US,
Yea, I had this conversation with my friend last night. He was skeptical that I would buy one, however, I made a point that if I go past March the tariffs will price me right out of an upgrade this gen. $600 + tax + shipping is almost $200 over my limit. tack on another flat % to the us gov't and forget about it.Oh, sure, but I am not going to wait to buy if I can get one tomorrow. I suspect prices are going to go up with these dumb tariffs in US.
If you are outside US, it’s probably not as urgent.
The fact that it is launching tomorrow and it can't be found anywhere in the US except for a single splash page at microcenter. Maybe I'm jumping the gun, but nothing would surprise me at this point.
I mean the real prices are whatever the scalpers are chargingThe biggest problem in the NVidia side is the 5070 with 12GB of VRAM. That's is not enough right now for some settings it would otherwise run, let alone in the near future.
AMD has a minimum viable card at 550 and a better one at 600, while the lowest card that can be recommended from NVidia is 750. And all that ignoring the real prices
Naw that's not enough to go on I think.
They've been stacking these at stores since CES.
The systems being down for internet might actually be a good thing. Scalpers typically find a way around the code to basically bulk buy these cards before the timer is even on for starting orders. Not allowing them to sniff the internet page ahead of time I think will mean that tomorrow it might last longer than 10 ms before stock goes out (or copium)
You can’t buy a 5090 for a reasonable price anywhere. And by “reasonable” I mean under $2500. You can’t buy a 4090 since they stopped producing them.I couldn't be happier with my 5090, but at this point I think it's the only 5000 series card worth even considering.
No point of getting a 5080 with the 4090 existing, and you just go with AMD for everything else.
You can’t buy a 5090 for a reasonable price anywhere. And by “reasonable” I mean under $2500. You can’t buy a 4090 since they stopped producing them.
Scalper prices for both are insane. Not that 5080 prices are reasonable either. But at MSRP or near it, 5080 would be an ok pick. Not great certainly but ok.
At $1500-2000 5080 is a ridiculous choice.
Just out of curiosity I checked scan.co.uk, which are rarely cheapest but typically will have stock if it can be found at a price, and despite them having one MSI RTX 5070 nonTi at £709 to buy in amongst many cards as either "Pre-order" (at high prices) or "notify me when available". The entire AMD RX 9070 range is all "notify me when available", suggesting they don't have any, and don't know when they are coming to even take a pre-order.The fact that it is launching tomorrow and it can't be found anywhere in the US except for a single splash page at microcenter. Maybe I'm jumping the gun, but nothing would surprise me at this point.
No if Native, even 5090 can'tCould this achieve it for games like cyberpunk and wukong with path tracing without framegen?
Not a card but i leave it here because its just as important
You can’t buy a 5090 for a reasonable price anywhere. And by “reasonable” I mean under $2500. You can’t buy a 4090 since they stopped producing them.
Scalper prices for both are insane. Not that 5080 prices are reasonable either. But at MSRP or near it, 5080 would be an ok pick. Not great certainly but ok.
At $1500-2000 5080 is a ridiculous choice.
So you dont know about FSR I see.so it's dumbed down 5070ti without dlss/cude.... who would've guessed.
I mean everything depends on the price. If it's really available and really 600$... then sure. maybe.
I know that. lol.No if Native, even 5090 can't
How else are people supposed to take your attitude? no PathTracing no merit, right?
And in a review thread you say bullshit to all of them, really? You can click on every video and google printed reviews. NO ONE did path tracing.
I read
tomshardware
eurogamer
techspot
And balanced several of my go to videos, and no one used path tracing on the x70 cards. Yet, I am the one living in a glass house eh?
Perhaps, but they are not doing that for Nvidia cards. I don't know man. This seems off
I mean we'll see soon enough, just imho its not enough to say there's a shortage.
AMD would have to be a special kind of stupid to stack these since CES in stores and have nothing to show for it.
XTX vs 3090 Path Tracing + FG only
You assume too much.So you dont know about FSR I see.
for 1080p that perf isn't the worst thing in the world. Since 9070XT has vastly improved RT tech it'll be interesting to see how much better it is![]()
Voila! There is interest for AMD fans to know where RDNA 4 lands compared to RDNA 3 architecture, including RTX Turing & RTX Ampere users, 100%, me included. If you're on Ada then I doubt there's a point, but again, let the numbers speak for themselves. I'm sure AMD has a huge improvement here due to the architecture changes.
Even 4k max settings overdrive if it gets 10 fps native it would still be 200% climb gen to gen over a 7900XTX (!). Journalists not even mentioning it when talking about the architecture and the changes for RT is a huge miss. There's a ton of ways to make them playable beyond just native. Its required in fact, even for the strongest cards. There's no GPU in the world right now where you can run overdrive mode native 4k. Doesn't mean its not worth benching.
The average is 52 fps with DLSS performance. Who references 1% highs when talking about a cards performance?AMD marketing kit telling them not to? Again, shady as fuck.
It doesn't put a light for gamers like me who would just upgrade from Ampere to a new card just because of path tracing. I really don't care raster performances going beyond my monitor refresh rate.
5070 Ti 4K Cyberpunk 2077 Overdrive hits 64 fps with DLSS 4 performance.
![]()
Page 8 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 review: DLSS 4 doesn't deliver 4090 performance
Digital Foundry tests the GeForce 5070. On this page: we introduce our test system, benchmarking methodology and initial impressions.www.eurogamer.net
Totally playable. Still not a card I want to buy but for sure, hiding AMD under the rug against the big performance hitters like path tracing is not doing anyone any good. We'll be the judge if the performances are acceptable.
Of course you can.
Peoples don't misunderstand this sometimes but there's no "RTX", RTX is an SDK to see each DXR call performances and miliseconds on the game you are working on. Once implemented the DXR just makes vendor agnostic function calls that AMD has to answer to. RDNA 3 & 2 can run overdrive, just at shit performances. I was really hoping to see the generational leap of RDNA 4 over RDNA 3 for this in particular. I was expecting a good 200% uplift, but I have no fucking data.
Not a pc expert in the slightest. So after some advice…
I’m Aiming for 4k 60. Could this achieve it for games like cyberpunk and wukong with path tracing without framegen? I don’t mind upscalling if it’s as good as they say but can’t stand lag.
Nope.Is there a power consumption chart for this card? Don't you guys care about power bill?
Path tracing benchmarks were conspicuously absent from the 5000 series reviews also. While, in the 5080 review Rich said: "we've got limited access to path traced games in the review period", and proceeded only to test percentage performance differentials at different DLSS levels in Cyberpunk PT, with no absolute figures given. To me that implies that Nvidia themselves are preventing access to the PT benchmarks, perhaps because Blackwell fares worse relative to Ada in math/VRAM limited applications.AMD marketing kit telling them not to? Again, shady as fuck.
It doesn't put a light for gamers like me who would just upgrade from Ampere to a new card just because of path tracing. I really don't care raster performances going beyond my monitor refresh rate.
Path tracing benchmarks were conspicuously absent from the 5000 series reviews also. While, in the 5080 review Rich said: "we've got limited access to path traced games in the review period", and proceeded only to test percentage performance differentials at different DLSS levels in Cyberpunk PT, with no absolute figures given. To me that implies that Nvidia themselves are preventing access to the PT benchmarks, perhaps because Blackwell fares worse relative to Ada in math/VRAM limited applications.
![]()
Where have I said that no path tracing no merit? Merit of what? Why are you so fucking keen that these cards have no merit in path tracing? I'll repeat again, leaked benchmarks for cyberpunk 2077 overdrive seemed promising
![]()
But sure, let's bundle up >18 games in raster as if we can't tell exactly where it is located in raster against competition. Not a single one to know where it is located for path tracing, not one. Brilliant journalism. Brilliant.
What a nice way to test a new architecture promising a total revamp for RT/PT. RDNA 4 should easily score above 200% gain in PT compared to RDNA 3. Fucking odd to omit that.
![]()
![]()
MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Ventus MSRP card review - Interesting chip for gamers and the end of the GPU shortage? | Page 10 | igor´sLAB
With the RTX 5070 Ti, NVIDIA has now launched a new graphics card on the market that is intended to position itself in the mid-range and promises both performance and modern features. The MSI RTX 5070…www.igorslab.de
![]()
Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti Review ft. MSI - KitGuru
January saw the launch of both the RTX 5090 and RTX 5080, but today the 50 series rollout continueswww.kitguru.net
![]()
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti review: bad start, decent GPU
Our RTX 5070 Ti review reveals a capable high-end GPU that's currently being let down by its excessive launch pricing.www.rockpapershotgun.com
(alan wake 2 PT)
![]()
MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vanguard SOC Review
The MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vanguard comes with the most powerful cooling solution tested today. It's also the quietest card and runs at lower temperatures than any other model—out of the box, no BIOS switch required. Performance is excellent, too, but pricing is very high.www.techpowerup.com
(minecraft path tracing)
![]()
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti review: A proper high-end GPU, if you can find it at MSRP
A decent upgrade from the RTX 4070 Ti, but a smaller bump from the 4070 Ti Super.www.tomshardware.com
In the meantime, I can't gamble on a card where I have 0, zero information on titles that interest me to upgrade to begin with. Don't even bother replying again if its to say "buT I doNT CArE aBoUT PT?".
Yes, but with absolute performance figures?DF put almost 15 mins non stop video of 5070 Ti path tracing![]()
Why proceed to show weeks old reviews and videos with nothing to do in context to this review thread. This is a 9070 review thread. Its as if you are flinging things at the wall just to see what sticks to point a finger and yell, "Hah, see? They do review pathtracing. So shut the fuck up!"
How does that have any bearing on my two points that
A. These cards suck for what you want them to do. Pathtracing without MFG max and DLSS at the lowest level will get you 60fps
2. No reviewer that is listed in this thread nor in my pointed to references used pathtracing in their reviews. You seem to think it is some conspiracy on AMD's part that they were not allowed to include pathtracing in their reviews. All of them? Ever. Single. One. From today's RX 9070 XT reviews?
Well I found what I was looking for ! Fucking finally.
Best channel around of course, optimum tech. Doesn't go into fucking drama, without funny faces on thumbnail and does not put big explosions or sensationalist titles for clickbaits unlike 99% of other techtubers.
Don't know how to compare my 3080 Ti to that for now but this is acceptable performances. Before even enabling AMD frame gen. For those wondering, yes, Cyberpunk 2077 overdrive is playable at 1440p based on this optimum test.
That was easy wasn't it?
Again, don't care about 5070 Ti performance next to it, I do not want to pay close to $1k for that turd. Can't believe it was as hard as finding a pin in a haystack to find an overdrive performance metric.
Yes, but with absolute performance figures?
I thought they were just percentages but I just checked and they do give frame rates. It still is strange that there is no comparison to other GPUs.Uh? It goes from native → DLSS Perf with MFG in all cases in their usual benchmark scripted path.
Native information as being playable or not does not make any fucking sense for cyberpunk overdrive. You WILL use upscalers and if you have FG? Might as well use it too. Its not an esport game.
There's also tweaks to optimize outside of overdrive settings to improve further.
Just ignoring it is mind blowing attitude to me.
9070XT has playable framerates for cyberpunk 2077 overdrive. I suggest any new buyers of that card to test it out and optimize around it. It's a generational leap in visuals.