So your ideal phone is the Galaxy S5 I'm guessing?
No, because of the size and TouchWiz (which is minor complaint for me really). My ideal phone sounds like it's going to be the Moto X+1 or Xperia Z3 Compact.
So your ideal phone is the Galaxy S5 I'm guessing?
So your ideal phone is the Galaxy S5 I'm guessing?
No, because of the size and TouchWiz (which is minor complaint for me really). My ideal phone sounds like it's going to be the Moto X+1 or Xperia Z3 Compact.
I hope you don't live in the US.
Not everyone needs 30 cores and 4 gig of ram to power through their shit software so it can just barely be bested by a $99 phone
Criticism is not hate. Corporations do not deserve blind loyalty. Motorola are not without fault.
Tell me this without invoking a strawman or even discussing another Android OEM: Can Samsung do far better to optimize Touchwiz on their *current* hardware for speed, stutter and frame rate?
yeah, through the app. apparently it's a known driver issue so i will try the proposed solution later.Using the app? Maybe your device isn't supported? Just flash through recovery?
Maybe speed, stutter, and framerate are things 0.01% of people actually care about, and so Samsung would prefer to continue increasing the number of value-added software features on their devices. I mean if you HATE software features then bone-stock Android is for you. I enjoy having extra features, and the UI occasionally hitching when I use my phone doesn't send me into hysterics and make me want to smash it on the floor.
Can Samsung improve their optimization of Touchwiz? Of course, just look at how Sense has evolved in recent years. But the way people in AndroidGAF act, it's like if the UI isn't continuously at 60fps 100% of the time and apps launch before your finger hits the glass it's literally a crime against humanity. I mean the worst UI smoothness hipsters have gone to Windows Phone because it's literally more important to them for the UI to be smooth than to have useful functions and apps. I can't understand that mentality at all.
Smartphones are tools, and I chose the tool which does the most useful things that I need to do in my life. My Note II has a lot of useful built-in functions, and the battery literally lasts forever. I don't sit there and swipe the launcher back and forth all day to check if it's moving at 60fps. I don't time how long it takes for an app to launch. That sort of thing is irrelevant to me.
Should have got the G3 prime.I'm loving the G3. It's soo good to finally have I phone I'm satisfied with, after a long and tiresome process of returning and selling the M8, OPO and S5.
It's amazing how even a simple question requires some passionate defense on your part of Samsung, a need to attack stock Android (which wasn't even mentioned) a need to downplay smooth UI performance and a need to justify your own purchase.
A simple, "I love the software that Samsung offer and it would be even better if they could further optimize the UI for speed, responsiveness and frame rate" would have sufficed.
It's amazing how even a simple question requires some passionate defense on your part of Samsung, a need to attack stock Android (which wasn't even mentioned) a need to downplay smooth UI performance and a need to justify your own purchase.
A simple, "I love the software that Samsung offer and it would be even better if they could further optimize the UI for speed, responsiveness and frame rate" would have sufficed.
Half the fun is telling others that they're wrong!
Also, we're at the TouchWiz vs Stock cycle again.
What comes next?
On screen buttons vs Physical buttons?
SD cards vs integrated memory?
Amoled vs LCD?
Metal vs Plastic?
Tech Specs vs Experience?
I've probably missed one....
Physical, integrated, AMOLED, plastic, tech specs.
I am glad to have helped in your inadvertent survey.
Nah, I need it now. Might upgrade when it releases though, but I doubt it will be a considerable upgrade.Should have got the G3 prime.
It's already out Prime Phones: Explained!: http://youtu.be/sFGEBTdK2Z0Nah, I need it now. Might upgrade when it releases though, but I doubt it will be a considerable upgrade.
It's already out Prime Phones: Explained!: http://youtu.be/sFGEBTdK2Z0
Quit being cheap.No way dude. $1000 for Snapdragon 805 without warranty, not worth it.
Quit being cheap.
Got a lil bored of my LGG2. To prevent a stupid und unnessescary purchase of a new phone I tried to change the UI a lil haha. The feel of 'something new'
I ike the result tho.
And I would like to kick my ass for letting my OnePlus invite expire some weeks ago. I saw resale prices for the phone or the invites...
my oh my.
It's already out Prime Phones: Explained!: http://youtu.be/sFGEBTdK2Z0
Does LTE-A require the spec bump in the phones, or did they just throw it in because they can in a more expensive phone?
I was all ready to get rid of my S5 in favor of the oneplus one, but I rooted/installed a new rom on it last week and it feels like a brand new phone.
I installed dynamic kat with the Google play edition theme and it's great. The battery brain and stutter problems I had with touch wiz are gone. I used to average a little over 4 hours of screen time on touch wiz, but right now I'm at 3 hours 50 minutes with 42% left. I can easily hit 5.5 to 6 hours screen time with this rom.
Getting rid of touchwiz was the best thing I did to this phone. Gave the oneplus one to my brother.
If you watch the video, it's for a specific Korean carrier. I don't think for a second the spec bump (other than the need for a radio that supports cat-6 speeds) was needed. It's a way to justify the new variant's existence beyond just faster LTE speeds. And it's too soon for proper sequels to the GS5 or G3.
On screen buttons vs Physical buttons?
SD cards vs integrated memory?
Amoled vs LCD?
Metal vs Plastic?
Tech Specs vs Experience?
I've probably missed one....
It's funny what a revelation it always seems to be to people when they get rid of TouchWiz. Wow, an Android phone can actually be smooth and non-bloated! It's a shame that Samsung's phones sell so well. I'd much rather live in a world where stock (or close) Android ruled.
How is CM browser so much faster at rendering pages than chrome etc. Its a brilliant browser. I recommend it.
Amoled vs LCD?
Physical, SD card, LCD, plastic, tech specs.
Obviously.
It's sad considering stock Android is an actual competitor to iOS.
The majority of iOS ship jumpers emigrate to Touchwiz, thinking it's the only real option, and that's the shitty version of Android they complain about to their iOS friends before they switch back![]()
As someone who does wireless tech support there are no words to explain how many people call in swearing this is the last samsung phone they will get or "I should have just got an iphone" or just cussing samsung out in general.
Poor casuals. They never had a chance.
samsung amoled vs motorola amoled
I would tell you that all phone AMOLED displays are made by Samsung, including the ones used in Moto devices, but that would go against the narrative of AndroidGAF where Samsung is like the Hitler of phones.
So yes, Moto AMOLED is far superior to Samsung AMOLED and the difference is visibly obvious. This is the same as how the plastic used in Moto and Sony phones is clearly superior to the plastic that Samsung uses.
I would tell you that all phone AMOLED displays are made by Samsung, including the ones used in Moto devices, but that would go against the narrative of AndroidGAF where Samsung is like the Hitler of phones.
So yes, Moto AMOLED is far superior to Samsung AMOLED and the difference is visibly obvious. This is the same as how the plastic used in Moto and Sony phones is clearly superior to the plastic that Samsung uses.
On screen buttons vs Physical buttons?
SD cards vs integrated memory?
Amoled vs LCD?
Metal vs Plastic?
Tech Specs vs Experience?
I've probably missed one....
Not at all.Does LTE-A require the spec bump in the phones, or did they just throw it in because they can in a more expensive phone?
I hope you don't live in the US.