Mr. Wonderful
Member
The media coverage outgrew the scope of the actual problem a long time ago.
Hopefully we get a recall tomorrow.
Hopefully we get a recall tomorrow.
If it needs to be recalled because aesthetics were put before functionality then the person to fire would be Jobs. Everyone gives him credit for the phone - he shouldn't be held responsible for its faults?StuBurns said:Jobs might bin someone, but I doubt it'd be to stroke his ego, if there is a recall, it's going to cost Apple, someone should be fired.
If they play it right, it's not really going to cost them anything, it'll still be a profit. Just a reduced profit.StuBurns said:Jobs might bin someone, but I doubt it'd be to stroke his ego, if there is a recall, it's going to cost Apple, someone should be fired.
teiresias said:If it needs to be recalled because aesthetics were put before functionality then the person to fire would be Jobs. Everyone gives him credit for the phone - he shouldn't be held responsible for its faults?
I honest want a "deal with it" conference because I want to see steve jobs self destruct as much as roger ebert did at the end of his career. :lolOwensboro said:The part of me that loves to read the rabid fanboyism / anti-fanboyism / trolling that goes on in all Apple threads really wants it to be a "deal with it" conference. These threads are always the funniest things I read all day. It's not every day that you can be reminded of school children arguing over who is cooler: Mario or Sonic (Super Nintendo / Genesis).
But realistically, I hope they 1) acknowledge there is a problem and 2) at least say they are working on a fix. I have a feeling #1 will happen no matter what, but how they present it could be interesting. I imagine there will be plenty of statistics and graphs that no one can prove or disprove that show it only affects a small percentage of phones. Then, #2 will happen and these forums will explode with "They didn't do enough! Those arrogant jerks!" and "See! Apple is a great company that cares about people!".
Hrmm... I guess it will be fun regardless of what they do. I still vote for "deal with it" though. :lol
Yes, it's his fault, but I'm pretty sure he isn't going to fire himself. If the owners demand a head rolls, it will, and it won't be Jobs, he's took the company from the ICU to one of the biggest technology companies in the world in fourteen years. He can do whatever the fuck he wants and the board will line up to rim him daily.teiresias said:If it needs to be recalled because aesthetics were put before functionality then the person to fire would be Jobs. Everyone gives him credit for the phone - he shouldn't be held responsible for its faults?
All this Apple drama is now at the top of the Drudge Report btw.
JoeBoy101 said:This is just priceless compared to the people over the past two days:
"Who cares about Consumer Reports?!?"
"Nobody listens to CNN anymore, least watched Cable News!"
They are doing this on a Friday so whatever it is they are announcing, it's timed to see as little media coverage as possible. :/tino said:I honest want a "deal with it" conference because I want to see steve jobs self destruct as much as roger ebert did at the end of his career. :lol
Yes, steve, that's what you get for cock blocking google voice from app store. Think I have forgotten that? NEVER!!
It's a classic engineer's dilemma that's happened many times in the past where an arbitrary management decision overrides the technical side.StuBurns said:This issue is too easily fixed for me to believe they've known about it for a long time.
It's an Avant-Garde piece titled "Wait, I'm Confused. What if This Was a Mural Instead? I'm Just Trying To Understand the Scope of This Problem".Marty Chinn said:Here you go Burger, just for you:
Jobs might be an arrogant dictator, but he isn't an idiot, if the choice was ship a phone that works perfect, or one that doesn't, he wouldn't ship the broken one, I really can't see why he would. It just means having to come back and fix it now.XiaNaphryz said:It's a classic engineer's dilemma that's happened many times in the past where an arbitrary management decision overrides the technical side.
...this is the 4th gen iPhone, friend.Technosteve said:Some time i wished there was a RDF filter built in to my browser so i can skip over the obvious trolls.
Things you should know about Apple products, Never buy a gen 1 product, Never buy a Rev. A product from them. Apple has had a horrible track record of putting out new hardware designs with functional problems. First gen Al powerbooks, first gen unibody mac book pros, first gen mac minis, first gen time capsule
So was it a conspiracy when they showed off the iPad case? What deficiency is that product fixing?josephdebono said:I can't believe anyone thinks Apple didn't know about this before.
I find the fact that they dedicated over 10 seconds of a keynote to show rubber bands is enough of a proof for me.
I keep hearing this "blown out of proportion" statement. Please tell me, what proportion of importance is telephone signal strength on a mobile telephone? Seems to me like it would be at the top of the list of most important things. If Apple had designed a phone with a "drop call" button on the lower left corner of it where many people grip the phone, would you still be defending them? Because that's exactly what they did.Interfectum said:Joke post?
You'd fire Jobs over a mistake that is being blown completely out of proportion? Eventhough he's basically the reason the iPhone even exists in the first place? :lol Some of you... just wow.
Technosteve said:Some time i wished there was a RDF filter built in to my browser so i can skip over the obvious trolls.
Things you should know about Apple products, Never buy a gen 1 product, Never buy a Rev. A product from them. Apple has had a horrible track record of putting out new hardware designs with functional problems. First gen Al powerbooks, first gen unibody mac book pros, first gen mac minis, first gen time capsule
Have you actually used one of these, though?AVclub said:I keep hearing this "blown out of proportion" statement. Please tell me, what proportion of importance is telephone signal strength on a mobile telephone? Seems to me like it would be at the top of the list of most important things. If Apple had designed a phone with a "drop call" button on the lower left corner of it where many people grip the phone, would you still be defending them? Because that's exactly what they did.
They could've just come to the conclusion that it was a risk worth taking to release as-is and just underestimated the impact of the design. For all we know, Jobs may have been hearing advice from a bunch of people with enough technical backing wanting to push it out anyway who drowned out the objections and assured him the issue wasn't that bad.StuBurns said:Jobs might be an arrogant dictator, but he isn't an idiot, if the choice was ship a phone that works perfect, or one that doesn't, he wouldn't ship the broken one, I really can't see why he would. It just means having to come back and fix it now.
When MS shipped the 360, I completely believe they knew it was a piece of shit, but they couldn't afford to delay and fix it, they wanted the head start, and although it cost them a lot of money, it got them a considerable market share. I don't think the release date of the iPhone is a big deal in that same way at all.
I'm not saying he didn't know, but I doubt it, or at least, not so early that it could have been fixed.
Know how many calls I've dropped so far? Zero.AVclub said:I keep hearing this "blown out of proportion" statement. Please tell me, what proportion of importance is telephone signal strength on a mobile telephone? Seems to me like it would be at the top of the list of most important things. If Apple had designed a phone with a "drop call" button on the lower left corner of it where many people grip the phone, would you still be defending them? Because that's exactly what they did.
They're promotional bags given out during the 3G release.WordAssassin said:WTF? Is that the original iPhone's box on the left there or is that some promotional thing? I had a 4Gig OG iPhone and I totally don't recall the box being so huge!
StuBurns said:Know how many calls I've dropped so far? Zero.
It's 'blown out of proportion' because the amount of people affected isn't clear, but it certainly doesn't seem to be that many.
All the units are affected, but not all the users.
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:So was it a conspiracy when they showed off the iPad case? What deficiency is that product fixing?
What does this have to do with anything?andycapps said:That phones can get scratched?
I agree, it does need fixing, that doesn't mean it hasn't been blown out of proportion, I've yet to meet an iPhone 4 user that isn't blown away by the product, let alone affected by this issue. I've met a lot of non-owners ripping the phone apart though.cartoon_soldier said:Guess what, most product recalls don't happen because of the number of users affected. They happen because there is a defect in the production needing fixing.
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:So was it a conspiracy when they showed off the iPad case? What deficiency is that product fixing?
Smh.SimleuqiR said:Let's see what happens Friday. Sounds like Steve knew about the possibility of an issue.
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:What does this have to do with anything?
It's a case. It protects against falls. The sides extend beyond the phone's normal thickness to protect against surface scratches.andycapps said:You asked what showing a case during a conference shows. It shows that some people may want to put a case on their phone to keep it from getting scratched. What practical usage does a "bumper" serve? Other than covering up the problem area that causes some users to drop calls.. Sure, it keeps it from bumping into other things on the edges, but in my past usages with mobile phones, I've never noticed issues there, it's always been on the front and backs of phones.
A lawsuit in what?Minsc said:Looks like multiple apple antenna experts are coming out saying they expressed their concerns at the antennae design early on in development... that's the main ingredient in a lawsuit to succeeding, proof that apple know about the defect and ignored it anyway!
it's cute that you believe that.cartoon_soldier said:Guess what, most product recalls don't happen because of the number of users affected. They happen because there is a defect in the production needing fixing.
Class action for faulty hardware no?Bboy AJ said:A lawsuit in what?
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:It's a case. It protects against falls. The sides extend beyond the phone's normal thickness to protect against surface scratches.
These conspiracy theories are terrible.
Well you might be okay anyway, there are rumors that the latest batches have a coating on the antenna so they don't have the issue.hiryu2015 said:I finally caved and reserved an iPhone at my local Apple Store about 8-9 days ago. knowing my luck, I'll probably get a "your iphone is ready" email right before this announcement/fix tomorrow.
maybe the reception won't be so bad since i live minutes from apple
Bumpers protect the surfaces very well due to the extended lip. That is precisely why I use one. The surfaces of the phone never make contact with another surface as a result of the bumper. Is also adds protection to the edges of the phone thanks to the rubber for minor impacts.andycapps said:So you take the bumpers being introduced as protecting the phone against falls, but that Apple doesn't think a full case is necessary due to the glass they use on the front and rear of the phone? That is certainly one explanation and is the one that people would like to believe. Hard to believe that Apple wouldn't have known about this issue prior to release, and some reports are indicating that people did and mentioned it. Bumpers would seem to resolve that issue... I don't see the huge leap in logic you seem to.
Marty Chinn said:Here you go Burger, just for you:
:lol exactly. Imagine if MS gave out a free faceplate to everyone affected by the RROD . . . the Apple Disciples would be all over it. Hypocrites much?claviertekky said:The announcement will probably be free bumpers for all iPhone 4 users, and the Apple fans will finally rejoice that iPhone is a JesusPhone again.
It cannot be free bumpers.claviertekky said:The announcement will probably be free bumpers for all iPhone 4 users, and the Apple fans will finally rejoice that iPhone is a JesusPhone again.
AstroLad said::lol exactly. Imagine if MS gave out a free faceplate to everyone affected by the RROD . . . the Apple Disciples would be all over it. Hypocrites much?