After I trolled them about Doritosgate I don't think I would have much chance winning a competition :/
Haha. It's funny to see the wagons still being circled after all the kerfuffle from doritos/florence's timely article etc.
I can't see any reason whatsoever to trust the vast majority of games writers since the linke between what is PR and what is news is so blurred as to be indistinguishable. You get great news from niche sites or mags with a specific focus that is never going to be a commercial goldmine (eg retro gamer), but anyone talking about halo 4 for example is unlikely to be reliable.
Especially when they are plugging chips and soft drink, or being presented the games limited edition in a lavish ceremony.
Games journalists seem to think they are part of the industry making the games, thus they are generally soft on it and more like spokesmen for it. The fact so many games journalists wind up working for developers/publishers makes it even clearer - pigs at the trough.
Does it bother me? In principle yes, but I wont lose sleep over it. I just assume I'm being lied to or advertised to. Same thing. I do laugh when people like kotaku writers want to be taken seriously though.
Nintendo do their Direct shows, which are obviously advertising. Kotaku/IGN/joystiq/gamespot etc are all doing the ads for MS/Sony/EA/Activision etc. It's just one extra layer between the two. Be honest and declare it.
If you want proof its just a marketing arm, look no further than the lack of media scrutiny of rrod, skyrim/fallout ps3, EA hacks, hitman pay for reviews/PR, Halo 4 bannings/perfect scores and vanishing saves with no mention at all from the press.