TheThreadsThatBindUs
Member
This whole issue of "being passed over for promotions" is so much utter creamy horseshit, because it denies the fundamental reality that we are not and absolutely can not be the ultimate evaluators of our own workplace performance... we're way too fucking biased.
Think about it... anyone evaluating their own performance in any context will rate themselves higher than they are actually performing. It's basic human psychology. We estimate our own performance higher than it is in reality because we tend to exaggerate where we are doing well and all but ignore where we're fucking up.
It's why self-appraisal systems are so common in companies because they try to force employees to confront their weaknesses and place focus on areas of growth.
So whenever, anyone is claiming to have been passed over for a promotion because of anything related to anything other than performance, I would always call BS, because, without direct proof (that is never available -- because you'd need to demonstrate directly that your performance in every relevant metric exceeded the person who did get the promotion), it's virtually impossible to demonstrate how you were more qualified for the promotion than the person that did get it. That's an extremely difficult thing to prove when you often don't even know the exhaustive list of things that were considered to inform the promotion decision.
Think about it... anyone evaluating their own performance in any context will rate themselves higher than they are actually performing. It's basic human psychology. We estimate our own performance higher than it is in reality because we tend to exaggerate where we are doing well and all but ignore where we're fucking up.
It's why self-appraisal systems are so common in companies because they try to force employees to confront their weaknesses and place focus on areas of growth.
So whenever, anyone is claiming to have been passed over for a promotion because of anything related to anything other than performance, I would always call BS, because, without direct proof (that is never available -- because you'd need to demonstrate directly that your performance in every relevant metric exceeded the person who did get the promotion), it's virtually impossible to demonstrate how you were more qualified for the promotion than the person that did get it. That's an extremely difficult thing to prove when you often don't even know the exhaustive list of things that were considered to inform the promotion decision.