Bernd Lauert
Banned
And where is Ja? I need to make sense of all this.When will Phil Spencer announce his disappointment with Sony?
And where is Ja? I need to make sense of all this.When will Phil Spencer announce his disappointment with Sony?
When will Phil Spencer announce his disappointment with Sony?
Yep. And it works the other way round too. You a man and want to work in a kindergarten or be a nurse? It's gonna be easy mode.In my industry it is dominated by men. Any women with the qualifications and can string two sentences together (a degree in math or science) will be hired instantly and competed for. I was told by one large company president when I was younger they only cared about retaining minorities. They had bad minority retention numbers and they were focusing on fixing that.
Certain fields are like that based on how for decades certain groups of people were pushed towards those roles and fields. For years women were pushed towards nursing and Dr were men. I know lots of men who are nurses because of that now as hospitals try to hire more men into those fields.Yep. And it works the other way round too. You a man and want to work in a kindergarten or be a nurse? It's gonna be easy mode.
ROTFL xDPeople who use lmao and lol in every sentence are like girls who giggle when they get nervous.
When will Phil Spencer announce his disappointment with Sony?
People who use lmao and lol in every sentence are like girls who giggle when they get nervous.
I hope the young lady gets Justice and wins her case.
Omg I laughed so hard at this
My post history can witness I'm FAR from being a Sony fanboy, but this sounds like another nothing-burger.The women describe a range of behaviors across multiple U.S.-based PlayStation offices, including demeaning comments, unwelcome advances, a lack of attention paid to their work or ideas and, most frequently, a sense that it was harder for women to be promoted in the company.
70 vs 4?Maybe they just weren’t what they were looking for in a promotion, not because they were ladies
70 vs 4?
I think there is a big problem, when that much gets promoted, while the other side gets 4. You dont get almost 70 men to be qualified for promotion, while there are 4 women, who get those promotion.
The problem is that only 4 women were promoted. That is 5% compared to men, who were 95%. At this age, such disparity shouldn't exist, especially with college education and other tools women have.What data exactly are you basing that on? Just a feeling? I'm not saying it couldn't be an actual real problem, but just thinking "oh this seems wrong to me" isn't really meaningful. No offence mate, I agree 70 vs. 4 seems like a large difference but then I don't have the context of the many factors involved, so I wouldn't say what you did.
70 vs 4?
I think there is a big problem, when that much gets promoted, while the other side gets 4. You dont get almost 70 men to be qualified for promotion, while there are 4 women, who get those promotion.
seems like it happens on certain division or department under Playstation, hopefully Sony fix this asap.
The problem is that only 4 women were promoted. That is 5% compared to men, who were 95%. At this age, such disparity shouldn't exist, especially with college education and other tools women have.
Your answer to your questionI studied in very demander free-to-entry engineering school where they had positive discrimination for girl because there were too little in the STEM fields
Its pathetic, that you didnt think what you typed clearly.The number of women trying to enter or going for recruitment remained low because women just don't want to study in STEM fields. And it's not because they're not capable, but because some women are privileged, infantilized, spoiled c.....people.
70/4 shouldnt happen at all. That is statically impossible for a company like Sony. Its just shows that women working there, aren't qualified for promotion, while their male coworkers gets promoted.You're saying "it shouldn't", but we don't know the data, you can't just say that. What does the year 2022 have to do with whether or not people deserve/ask for promotions?! Anyway, I don't want to argue with you, so lets agree to disagree on this one.
70/4 shouldnt happen at all. That is statically impossible for a company like Sony. Its just shows that women working there, aren't qualified for promotion, while their male coworkers gets promoted.
I understand your point. People should get promoted for their work. But when you promote 70 men, and only 4 women, then that isnt promotion on skills.I'm sorry you don't understand. People should get promotions if their work shows they should and importantly if they actually ask for one, with the former evidence to back it up.
I understand your point. People should get promoted for their work. But when you promote 70 men, and only 4 women, then that isnt promotion on skills.
That is the issue. The promotion process is a mess. There is no fair for women down there. Of all the women working on those offices, only 4 got the promotion ticket. It paints as the men there are alot better, than the women working there.
If you are women, how will you feel about these process? Do you think you stand a chance to get promoted?
You don't know that and you have zero insight into the company or process. You literally know nothing and here you are describing a broken process. Get your head out of your rear.I understand your point. People should get promoted for their work. But when you promote 70 men, and only 4 women, then that isnt promotion on skills.
That is the issue. The promotion process is a mess. There is no fair for women down there. Of all the women working on those offices, only 4 got the promotion ticket. It paints as the men there are alot better, than the women working there.
If you are women, how will you feel about these process? Do you think you stand a chance to get promoted?
Without knowing the details (unless it's in the info and I didnt bother reading it), 70 vs 4 sounds huge, but it also comes down to how many men and women there are. I dont think PS divisions are so skewed to be men, but who knows.70 vs 4?
I think there is a big problem, when that much gets promoted, while the other side gets 4. You dont get almost 70 men to be qualified for promotion, while there are 4 women, who get those promotion.
I am sorry, but that shouldnt be the case. If that was the case, then they wouldnt have put this lawsuit there. No fool believes that 70 men can go ask for promotion, while only 4 women ask for promotion. If the numbers were 15, that would have been somewhat on the grey line. But 4, that paints something different. It discourages other female employees, and that their contribution means nothing to the company.Its not just "skills" or experience, or time put in. Its actually asking/pressing for the promotion because you think you deserve it as well. Women are traditionally less likely to think they deserve a promotion, or to ask for it, or be aggressive in the process if they do ask for it.
If I were a woman I'd work hard and ask for a promotion based on my hard work, then if I didnt get it I would reflect on why that might be.
I am sorry, but that shouldnt be the case. If that was the case, then they wouldnt have put this lawsuit there. No fool believes that 70 men can go ask for promotion, while only 4 women ask for promotion. If the numbers were 15, that would have been somewhat on the grey line. But 4, that paints something different. It discourages other female employees, and that their contribution means nothing to the company.
Manual labor skews heavily towards men, while office heavily towards women. I have seen tons of women work on office, while more men worked on the floor.Without knowing the details (unless it's in the info and I didnt bother reading it), 70 vs 4 sounds huge, but it also comes down to how many men and women there are. I dont think PS divisions are so skewed to be men, but who knows.
I've worked in manufacturing and repair plants during university and on the shop floor and shipping bays there were literally zero women. Not one there to work the forklifts, lathes, internal cranes, or blast heater room. But there were a bunch in the office.
Pretty hard to promote women when they have none on the floor.
I didnt call you a fool. That wasnt my intention.Right, you're calling me a fool now because I disagree with you when you don't even understand how to think critically or understand what I'm saying. Kindly shove off now please and don't reply to this message.
The women describe a range of behaviors across multiple U.S.-based PlayStation offices, including demeaning comments, unwelcome advances, a lack of attention paid to their work or ideas and, most frequently, a sense that it was harder for women to be promoted in the company.
100% true. It goes beyond STEM too. Basically any career field that requires someone to get dirty or slave away in the summer heat or winter cold (ie. construction work, garbage man etc...) is probably 90% guys. Maybe even more depending on the occupation and job site.I'm not saying this is not a problem, in fact what is described is pretty true in many structures. And I agree that the lack of hiring, consideration, promotion and representation is a problem.
But fuck the rest. The representation is far from being 50/50, and although it should probably be at least 70/30, most women are factually and statistically less interested in working in fields like STEM, tech or video games.
The rest, anything that is a remark, I don't tolerate hearing those infantilized, spoiled and privilege woman complaints. "Man-up" or give-up your majority status ie. being consider an adult AND responsible person.
I didnt call you a fool. That wasnt my intention.
70/4 shouldnt happen at all. That is statically impossible for a company like Sony. Its just shows that women working there, aren't qualified for promotion, while their male coworkers gets promoted.
The problem is that only 4 women were promoted. That is 5% compared to men, who were 95%. At this age, such disparity shouldn't exist, especially with college education and other tools women have.
This is just not true. Men go into engineering more. There were hardly ANY women/girls in my college courses back in the day. There is no "discrimination" on who is admitted, or who is to apply to those programs. There could be a number of reasons why that is the case, but it ain't discrimination.Manual labor skews heavily towards men, while office heavily towards women. I have seen tons of women work on office, while more men worked on the floor.
For Sony, most of their work are office, were you will find alot of women on that field.
Its idiom for things that are hard to believe. You wrote that women are less to ask for promotion. That 70/4 pants something else."No fool believes that 70 men can go ask for promotion, while only 4 women ask for promotion."