LmaoSuperman - Meet me somewhere, motherfucker.
Batman - NO NO YOU MEET ME SOMEWHERE MUTHA FUCKA!
Superman - Gimme a fuckin' address, ho.
![]()
LmaoSuperman - Meet me somewhere, motherfucker.
Batman - NO NO YOU MEET ME SOMEWHERE MUTHA FUCKA!
Superman - Gimme a fuckin' address, ho.
![]()
I really fucking hate that line from bats.
The One and Done;192158654 said:Absolutely love how Superman schooled Batman.
What I like is that this is something Supes would actually do. He looks at Batman as a vigilante that instills fear rather than inspire hope. He would make a play to get him off the street. That scene was basically Supes saying, "This is your first and only warning."
I really hope they do a good job of also showing how Superman is completely different than Batman in how he solves problems.
Great scene. Can't wait.
Sounding amazing when we thought he was saying it inside his armour on the rooftop.
Yeah, back when he was face to face with Supes, instead of looking up at the sky well out of Superman's earshot.
Yeah, back when he was face to face with Supes, instead of looking up at the sky well out of Superman's earshot.
The One and Done™;192158654 said:Absolutely love how Superman schooled Batman.
What I like is that this is something Supes would actually do. He looks at Batman as a vigilante that instills fear rather than inspire hope. He would make a play to get him off the street. That scene was basically Supes saying, "This is your first and only warning."
I really hope they do a good job of also showing how Superman is completely different than Batman in how he solves problems.
Great scene. Can't wait.
Cavill is a very poor actor. He is bad in everything unfortunately.
Batman doesn't look pissed off enough, maybe not rising to it, weird looking though.
Sounding amazing when we thought he was saying it inside his armour on the rooftop.
Context really does make a difference.
When you say it 30 seconds before you start throwing punches it sounds badass.
When you say it as a vague threat, probably days before a fight, it's kind of petulant. "Oh, I'm going to get you *shakes fist* ".
They're ideological opposites, motivated by different life experiences, but with the same end-goal ultimately. With Superman's attitude here, I can understand why Batman would want to take him down. Who polices Superman, especially when he starts talking about mercy?
And yeah, another one for not liking Cavil's delivery here. Hopefully this was just for the trailer and the movie has the same scene with better line delivery.
I'm sure Superman could hear that, could he not?
Well, next to Supes, Batman is kinda like a child.
I don't get why people blame Snyder for the script of MoS. All the blames lies on Goyer, WB for rushing the movie, and partially Bryan Singer because of how hard Superman Returns tanked (Man of steel is pretty much the anti thesis to returns). Goyer is out, and Terrio has proven to be much more capable as well as the movie having a longer production and pre production run.I want to love this movie, I really do but I can't. I don't like Zack Synder movies never have so him directing and doing the JLA movies is very disheartening.
IMO nothing they shown after the first trailer has been good. This clip in particular Cavill acting was straight up trash. I'm really shocked on WB put DC in Synder's hands after how crappy MoS was.
I don't get why people blame Snyder for the script of MoS. All the blames lies on Goyer, WB for rushing the movie, and partially Bryan Singer because of how hard Superman Returns tanked (Man of steel is pretty much the anti thesis to returns). Goyer is out, and Terrio has proven to be much more capable as well as the movie having a longer production and pre production run.
I want to love this movie, I really do but I can't. I don't like Zack Synder movies never have so him directing and doing the JLA movies is very disheartening.
IMO nothing they shown after the first trailer has been good. This clip in particular Cavill acting was straight up trash. I'm really shocked on WB put DC in Synder's hands after how crappy MoS was.
His movies look great, his camera work is superb, and they feel extremely grounded regardless of the source material.
New Clip: http://teamcoco.com/video/zack-snyder-superman-clip
Full dialogue between Supes and Bats from the first TV spot.
Couldn't you also look at the scene as Supes not wanting to be there? He doesn't want to deal with Batman, he thinks very little of him and could easily stop him from doing anything. Stops the Batmobile, basically tells him his crusade is pointless, and flies away before Bats can even finish his sentence simply because he doesn't perceive Bats as a threat not worth anymore of his time. The entire scene is Bruce being completely out of his depth. It's supposed to be one sided.Too bad that isn't the only role of a director. For example from the short clip that was released. You have Superman basically threatening Batman and then getting away and Batman asking him if he bleeds and then after Superman leaves saying he will.
Now lest try to see how the director fucked up 10 seconds of simple interactions, if he wanted Batman to sound threatening, the content of the dialogue suggest as much, then the way it is deliver it is lack luster, not talking about the line itself or Ben but how it is delivered. That is Snyder's fault. There is no threat in the dialogue if Batman completes it with Superman going and at his back and worse is that Superman most likely hear it anyway. It would have been better to deliver the threat face to face and have Superman not think highly of it and then fly away rather than flying away then hearing the threat and not bothering to return.
The other part is Superman threatening Batman, now the deliver of the line could be a bad performance by the actor or a bad performance on purpose to stay in character with Superman that isn't used to threat other people. Now this is where a hand of a director can be noticed, someone with real talent would have never try to corner themselves in this kind of position because there are few actors that can pull this up and mostly they can because their acting history back them up, Cavil isn't a great actor not is recognized even as a good one, Snyder put him in a position where his performance would be attacked no matter what he does or how good or bad he did it.
I am not arguing that Snyder's films can't be entertaining but him be a good director? No way in hell.
I think that's sort of the point. He's a sanctimonious prick when it comes to vigilantesI'm cautiously optimistic about this movie, but Superman still seems like an asshole here. Maybe it'll be better in context.
Too bad that isn't the only role of a director. For example from the short clip that was released. You have Superman basically threatening Batman and then getting away and Batman asking him if he bleeds and then after Superman leaves saying he will.
Now lest try to see how the director fucked up 10 seconds of simple interactions, if he wanted Batman to sound threatening, the content of the dialogue suggest as much, then the way it is deliver it is lack luster, not talking about the line itself or Ben but how it is delivered. That is Snyder's fault. There is no threat in the dialogue if Batman completes it with Superman going and at his back and worse is that Superman most likely hear it anyway. It would have been better to deliver the threat face to face and have Superman not think highly of it and then fly away rather than flying away then hearing the threat and not bothering to return.
The other part is Superman threatening Batman, now the deliver of the line could be a bad performance by the actor or a bad performance on purpose to stay in character with Superman that isn't used to threat other people. Now this is where a hand of a director can be noticed, someone with real talent would have never try to corner themselves in this kind of position because there are few actors that can pull this up and mostly they can because their acting history back them up, Cavil isn't a great actor not is recognized even as a good one, Snyder put him in a position where his performance would be attacked no matter what he does or how good or bad he did it.
I am not arguing that Snyder's films can't be entertaining but him be a good director? No way in hell.
You mean the same MoS that was generally well received and made 668 million WW? That MoS? The same MoS that, despite releasing last, outsold both Iron Man 3 and Thor 2 on home video? You're shocked that WB gave the ship to the guy that made that happen?
i disagreeToo bad that isn't the only role of a director. For example from the short clip that was released. You have Superman basically threatening Batman and then getting away and Batman asking him if he bleeds and then after Superman leaves saying he will.
Now lest try to see how the director fucked up 10 seconds of simple interactions, if he wanted Batman to sound threatening, the content of the dialogue suggest as much, then the way it is deliver it is lack luster, not talking about the line itself or Ben but how it is delivered. That is Snyder's fault. There is no threat in the dialogue if Batman completes it with Superman going and at his back and worse is that Superman most likely hear it anyway. It would have been better to deliver the threat face to face and have Superman not think highly of it and then fly away rather than flying away then hearing the threat and not bothering to return.
.
Rotten Tomatoes isn't representative of the quality of a film you know. It gives you a very rough ballpark, but it has just as many flaws as Metacritic, which is also terrible for measuring quality.56% on rotten tomatoes is well received?
Rotten Tomatoes isn't representative of the quality of a film you know. It gives you a very rough ballpark, but it has just as many flaws as Metacritic, which is also terrible for measuring quality.
You mean the same MoS that was generally well received and made 668 million WW? That MoS? The same MoS that, despite releasing last, outsold both Iron Man 3 and Thor 2 on home video? You're shocked that WB gave the ship to the guy that made that happen?
Couldn't you also look at the scene as Supes not wanting to be there? He doesn't want to deal with Batman, he thinks very little of him and could easily stop him from doing anything. Stops the Batmobile, basically tells him his crusade is pointless, and flies away before Bats can even finish his sentence simply because he doesn't perceive Bats as a threat not worth anymore of his time. The entire scene is Bruce being completely out of his depth. It's supposed to be one sided.
56% on rotten tomatoes is well received?
Too bad that isn't the only role of a director. For example from the short clip that was released. You have Superman basically threatening Batman and then getting away and Batman asking him if he bleeds and then after Superman leaves saying he will.
Now lest try to see how the director fucked up 10 seconds of simple interactions, if he wanted Batman to sound threatening, the content of the dialogue suggest as much, then the way it is deliver it is lack luster, not talking about the line itself or Ben but how it is delivered. That is Snyder's fault. There is no threat in the dialogue if Batman completes it with Superman going and at his back and worse is that Superman most likely hear it anyway. It would have been better to deliver the threat face to face and have Superman not think highly of it and then fly away rather than flying away then hearing the threat and not bothering to return.
The other part is Superman threatening Batman, now the deliver of the line could be a bad performance by the actor or a bad performance on purpose to stay in character with Superman that isn't used to threat other people. Now this is where a hand of a director can be noticed, someone with real talent would have never try to corner themselves in this kind of position because there are few actors that can pull this up and mostly they can because their acting history back them up, Cavil isn't a great actor not is recognized even as a good one, Snyder put him in a position where his performance would be attacked no matter what he does or how good or bad he did it.
I am not arguing that Snyder's films can't be entertaining but him be a good director? No way in hell.
And the audience score at 76% means nothing as well?I'm not saying RT or Metacritic is a measure of quality - but it is a measure of how well received or not a film is.
It's not a school test grade. 56% means more than half which equals the majority. The audience rating is higher and it received an Cinemascore of A-. It also has generally high ratings in the different digital stores that sell the movie. Not to mention things like IMDB. Using RT as some sort of definitive measure of quality (and Metacritic for that matter) is fuckin' silly.