Kane Zakharov
Banned
BC2 focused on Rush mode with the map design, and it could've had great Conquest maps too. Personally it was never an issue as BC2 was a spinoff with a different focus in mind, and that's fine.
If the latest example of DICE working on Rush mode first then expanding on to Conquest has shown to be a total shitshow, what makes anyone think that it wouldn't happen again they go back on focusing on Rush? Especially considering they did a similar thing in BF4 by focusing on Conquest first. If this was a BC game I could understand the disappointment, but it's not.
Writing in all caps doesn't help your points nor the way people look at your posts, Seks.
Edit: It's not just the maps either, gadgets also play a role in this like I mentioned earlier. If a Rush map in BF4 is outdoors:
MAVs can easily spot at least half of the enemy team (like they already do in most of Rush mode in BF4 maps).
UCAVs are even more effective than in Conquest.
Mortars are also much more effective than in Conquest.
Lock-On weapons also render any aircraft completely useless because of Rush map design. I'm sure I'm missing a few here, but you get the idea.
If the latest example of DICE working on Rush mode first then expanding on to Conquest has shown to be a total shitshow, what makes anyone think that it wouldn't happen again they go back on focusing on Rush? Especially considering they did a similar thing in BF4 by focusing on Conquest first. If this was a BC game I could understand the disappointment, but it's not.
Writing in all caps doesn't help your points nor the way people look at your posts, Seks.
Edit: It's not just the maps either, gadgets also play a role in this like I mentioned earlier. If a Rush map in BF4 is outdoors:
MAVs can easily spot at least half of the enemy team (like they already do in most of Rush mode in BF4 maps).
UCAVs are even more effective than in Conquest.
Mortars are also much more effective than in Conquest.
Lock-On weapons also render any aircraft completely useless because of Rush map design. I'm sure I'm missing a few here, but you get the idea.