OldAsUrSock
Banned
GG is not trying to pull off destructible buildings.Embarrasing. If Killzone can pull out 1080p and probably 60 FPS in multiplayer, so should they.
GG is not trying to pull off destructible buildings.Embarrasing. If Killzone can pull out 1080p and probably 60 FPS in multiplayer, so should they.
That's a matter of personal opinion.I'm amazed that the people who keep shouting all the '60 FPS' nonsense are ok with a game running at 720p. A resolution that low on a large 1080p TV is far more detrimental to the gaming experience than 30FPS.
Running at 720p negates all of that.No other game looks nearly as good and is doing as many things at the same time.
You mean that 30-40 fps footage they've released that has 5 characters on screen in small environments without almost any environmental physics?
BF 4 is doing everything KZ:SF is doing technologically except for screen space reflection on every surface, but they have dynamic GI instead [which is cheaper though]. And thats on much greater scale, with much more particles and much more players and from the tweet in rock solid 60fps, so i wouldnt call DICE bad developer by any means.
Still i hoped at least for 1280x1080 on PS4 in similar fashion to GT 5/6. It also means that BF 4 will have higher requirements than BF 3 by quite a notch on ultra/high settings [not counting MSAA] on PC.
That's not true at all, optimisation comes last.
I expected more after they said 1080p but 720p still looks sharp enough on a TV.
If it's going to be 720 then it better be a stable 60.
GG is not trying to pull off destructible buildings.
That's not true at all, fps plays a. Massive massive role in fps, why do you think nearly all are now aiming for it, halo, bf, kz, cod. So you think cod sells because of looks?, no it sells for the gameplay and the fluidity 60 fps brings as it looks bang average.I'm amazed that the people who keep shouting all the '60 FPS' nonsense are ok with a game running at 720p. A resolution that low on a large 1080p TV is far more detrimental to the gaming experience than 30FPS.
You have to admit that 720p in this day and age doesn't inspire much confidence in the hardware's capabilities.
EA/DICE never confirmed 1080p.
That's not true at all, gameplay plays. Massive massive role in fps, why do you think nearly all are now aiming for it, halo, bf, kz, cod. So you think cod sells because of looks?, no it sells for the gameplay and the fluidity 60 fps brings as it looks bang average.
Really disappointing. Sony should make it that every game has to be 1080p.
You have to admit that 720p in this day and age doesn't inspire much confidence in the hardware's capabilities.
kinda suspected this, since they always explicitly mentioned 60fps for nextgen, but really never said anything about resolution.
i am disappoint nonetheless.
battlefield offers huge maps
low resolution directly impacts gameplay and your ability to see things in the distance. halo, kz, and cod are much more corridor focused.
Have you seen it yet?Running at 720p negates all of that.
Let's look at Killzone Shadowfall for a second.......Yep, amazing looking and 1080p/60 for MP. Blame EA more than the HW.
They 'should' be? I mean, according to who?
Running at 720p negates all of that.
I am afraid "platform parity" might be the reason it's 720p on the PS4. All you need to go from 720p to 1080p are more shaders, more ROPS and more bandwidth, all the things where PS4 has 50%-150% more advantage over the Xbone.
I wouldn't be surprised if MS paid them off to not use the extra power of the PS4.
battlefield offers huge maps
low resolution directly impacts gameplay and your ability to see things in the distance. halo, kz, and cod are much more corridor focused.
Did the kz shadowfall MP look as good BF4? I haven't really watched the shadowfall videos other than the single player portion which looked really cool, but I think BF4 was one of the best looking games I've seen at E3 especially with the kind of scale it has.
It doesn't effect distance to any meaningful effect, your acting like its sd. Ask people what they want in a fps a few more lines of res or 60 fps feel to the combat, I'd guess a pretty hi percentage will pick 60 fps.battlefield offers huge maps
low resolution directly impacts gameplay and your ability to see things in the distance. halo, kz, and cod are much more corridor focused.
Have you seen it yet?
Yes.So you guys want 1080p - 60fps - 64 players online - at console launch? I mean come on.
Really disappointing. Sony should make it that every game has to be 1080p.
Are you a developer? Ever got your hands on the new machines? If not, I'm not sure you're in a position to be saying what they should and should not be capable of.I don't see why not , yeah these consoles not high end but they have enough power to go over 720p.
Also devs can do what ever they want but i won't be buying any game that at 720p in 2013 .
But what about 8gb gddr5, huma, supercharged pc, esram and secret sauce?
Yes.
The GPU is strong enough.
So you guys want 1080p - 60fps - 64 players online - at console launch? I mean come on.
And 64 players.
You would think but I'm not sure why EA wasn't able to just do what it takes to get it to that point.
For people attempting to justifsy this with map size and player count - MAG had huge maps, 256 players and was rendered at 720p with 2xMSAA. On a PS3.,
That's not true at all, fps plays a. Massive massive role in fps, why do you think nearly all are now aiming for it, halo, bf, kz, cod. So you think cod sells because of looks?, no it sells for the gameplay and the fluidity 60 fps brings as it looks bang average.