• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Bethesda responding to negative Starfield reviews on Steam - "it's not boring", it's "by design"

GHG

Member
As spotted by social media account JuiceHead, the team has taken the slightly unusual step of explaining to the people leaving these negative reviews that the game is good, actually. It has then asked them to consider the amount of effort that went on behind the scenes to make a game of such scale.

In response to one user that called Starfield's story "generic" and the gameplay "boring", one member of Bethesda's customer support staff replied with a post highlighting everything players can experience in the game.

"You can fly, you can shoot, you can mine, you can loot!" it wrote. "Starfield is an RPG with hundreds of hours of quests to complete and characters to meet. Most quests will also vary on your character's skills and decisions, massively changing the outcome of your playthrough."

It then suggested the reviewer gives the game another chance, but this time tries different characters with different backgrounds.

"You will feel like you are playing a totally different game," it said. "Put points in different skills from a character you've previously created, and you are now faced with completely different decisions to make and difficulties to encounter."

Meanwhile, when another user lamented the amount of loading screens, the support team replied imploring the reviewer to "consider the amount of data for the expansive gameplay that is procedurally generated to load flawlessly in under three seconds".

In response to a reviewer that appears to have suggested they found Starfield's planets empty, the Bethesda team said this was "by design" and "not boring".

"The intention of Starfield's exploration is to evoke a feeling of smallness in players and make you feel overwhelmed. You can continue to explore and find worlds that do have the resources you need or hidden outposts to look through," it wrote.


F_-rLnuWgAAauYy


F_-rLnuWgAAauYy


F_-rOIVWYAAgWDj



I Need It Please GIF
 
Thanks for the info! Curious to see if they did the same for people who complained about technical issues, like no DLSS at launch or the Nvidia performance.
 

Astray

Member

F_-rLnuWgAAauYy


F_-rLnuWgAAauYy


F_-rOIVWYAAgWDj



I Need It Please GIF
Lmao this is like looking at a Newegg reviews section. Just endless generic replies to negative reviews.

But this is actually funnier, it's Microsoft discovering that Steam reviews are exceptionally hard to astroturf, so they make all the replies just seem like variations on "No, it's actually the children that are wrong".
 

M0G

Member
I dropped a bad review because there are blockers everywhere. The game could be fun if I could play it unhindered.
 

SoraNoKuni

Member
Well... People hyped it as potentially GOAT contender, the game is not that.
It's an ok game, which will click on some people and other will dislike it.
It's not a great game, the reviews are just the truth.
 

MidGenRefresh

*Refreshes biennially
Please generate Disneyland on the entirety of the surface of the planet, in less than half a second, on every planet I visit, just like in the real world. Sounds totally reasonable.

This is unfair. It's actually extremely difficult to find a barren planet in Starfield. Meaning, there's nothing on it, just you and some rocks. Every planet you land, you're surrounded by random shit. Solar panels there, wind turbines over there. Cryo labs! Abandon outpost! Shipwreck! Look, ship is landing 400 meters away, whoo! Points of interests everywhere.

So the problem is not that there are barren planets with nothing to do. The problem is that what's there is not actually interesting.
 

clarky

Gold Member
Wasn't that already decided prelaunch by everyone anticipating GotY and sales records? This is the aftermath.
Nope. This game is still living rent free on GAF for no particular reason.

Its a solid 8 in my eyes, the MC score its bang on. A flawed gem. Done with it for now but ill be back for the DLC for sure, any maybe a bit of sight seeing from time to time.
Well... People hyped it as potentially GOAT contender, the game is not that.
It's an ok game, which will click on some people and other will dislike it.
It's not a great game, the reviews are just the truth.
The reviews are anything from a 5/10 to a 10/10. Its neither. Lots of people in the OT loved it though, myself included.
 
Last edited:

clarky

Gold Member
Drop the sad Console warring attempts or you will be given a prolonged break
This subject is being talked about across the gaming media and gaming circles at the moment. If you're not fond of the subject matter and it's making you emotional then you're always free stick your head in the sand and ignore the thread.
Ok mate. I liked the game not sure what your point is? I'm not seeing 20 threads about Baldurs gate 3 for example.

I guess guess people just love a pile on. Feel free to stick your head back up your arse at any time.
 

xrnzaaas

Member
Telling people they're wrong, even in a polite way, is not the way to go. If you want to make players like your game how about working on improving it? Especially since most reviews point out stuff that's wrong with it.

Obviously that's not gonna happen and instead the modders will have to deliver on stuff like planets with unique instead of copy-pasted content.
 

GHG

Member
Ok mate. I liked the game not sure what your point is? I'm not seeing 20 threads about Baldurs gate 3 for example.

I guess guess people just love a pile on. Feel free to stick your head back up your arse at any time.

You might want to calm down. Just a suggestion.

It's time for realise that your own personal opinion and the echo chamber that the OT was (this isn't a slight by the way, OT's are always echo chambers by nature, it's just how things tend to transpire), don't align with the opinions of the masses who have played the game.

8GQKg9m.jpg


Hundreds of thousands of people are not buying this game on PC to "pile on". There's a much cheaper avenue by which people are able to do so if that were their prerogative.
 
Last edited:
I initially would think if you have to explain your game, the tech and design choices, outside of the game to people that have actually tried it out yourself, your game does something fundamentally wrong. But I also remember how people did not get Brütal Legend at all, kinda misleading with the demo and then people not getting that even the RTS like parts have to be played quite similarly. Also Deathloop in my case, where I actually thought it was an only MP game until after release and only really understood it once I tried it myself, but then I got it at least, while still not really my cup of tea. Or people struggling to see anything but a tech demo in Crysis and Ryse. Yeah, people probably quite often don't "get" a game. Trying to explain it afterwards still won't help though. If it isn't possible to distill any such explanation in a catchy one liner. Any game should be self explanatory today and not become good after 10 hours or some other nonsense.
People's expectations are becoming more entitled with every gen, despite having more and more alternatives, but with hive minded twitter mob and influencers partially fake raging, customer stisfaction will get even harder in the future.
 

DarthPutin

Member
I could live with empty worlds, but only if you give me fun ways to get around - high speed flying, Spider-manning, parcouring. I am not walking/running slowly only to discover nothing on the way.

And talking of realism of "empty space", how the hell it is realistic not to have vehicles when you can casually travel between planet systems?
 

cireza

Member
You might want to calm down. Just a suggestion.

It's time for realise that your own personal opinion and the echo chamber that the OT was (this isn't a slight by the way, OT's are always echo chambers by nature, it's just how things tend to transpire), don't align with the opinions of the masses who have played the game.

8GQKg9m.jpg


Hundreds of thousands of people are not buying this game on PC to "pile on". There's a much cheaper avenue by which people are able to do so if that were their perogative.
Damn ! Can't fight against this.
 

clarky

Gold Member
You might want to calm down. Just a suggestion.

It's time for realise that your own personal opinion and the echo chamber that the OT was (this isn't a slight by the way, OT's are always echo chambers by nature, it's just how things tend to transpire), don't align with the opinions of the masses who have played the game.

8GQKg9m.jpg


Hundreds of thousands of people are not buying this game on PC to "pile on". There's a much cheaper avenue by which people are able to do so if that were their prerogative.
Chill, im not being serious.

It appears that my options do align with the majority of players? The above stat's say as much? Or did you mean the majority of posters on GAF?

I do love it when the old steam reviews are rolled out to justify ones position on a game. Surely the above just cements that for every person that didn't like the game there are 2 that did? I'm not sure what it proves other than its not a game for everyone.
 
Last edited:

Flutta

Banned
They made a fun game. You guys can't be satisfied by anything.
They really did, it’s even more fun than F76 and that's not saying much.
It's so fun that people left it and went back to Skyrim, a game that should be in a museum by now.
It's so damn fun that even Phil and his minions have stopped talking about it.
It’s so fun that the concurrent player count can't even beat Fallout 4...FALLOUT 4!!! imagine that (THIS IS NO JOKE) :messenger_tears_of_joy:.

But you are right, game is really fun and most gamers are missing out.
 
Top Bottom