Black Myth: Wukong PC benchmark tool available on Steam
- Thread starter LectureMaster
- Start date
Agent_4Seven
Tears of Nintendo
I've the same CPU. All you need is much better GPU and why would you even bother with RT on a none-RT capable GPU?
Zero stutters with locked 30FPS on my rig in benchmark at least.
Last edited:
Bartski
Gold Member
I think it was set automatically. This PC was never meant for gaming but it's the only one I have so here we areI've the same CPU. All you need is much better GPU and why would you even bother with RT on a none-RT capable GPU?
Lucifers Beard
Member
So you're saying that they released the entire game but only gave access to the benchmark? That seems fucking stupid on the developers part.
LiquidMetal14
hide your water-based mammals
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
lol come on. We are finally getting a next gen game that looks like a next gen game and taxes the GPUs like a next gen game.
If you are maxing out settings then of course its going to run poorly. RT is the only thing thats unoptimized and you can turn that off and still get Epic's own software Lumen for realtime dynamic GI, and great FPS.
With RT off and everything else maxed out, i was getting an average of 55 fps at 4k dlss performance (1080p) on a 3080. You NEVER play at max settings on PC. no one does. Im sure once i set them to high, i will easily get over 60 fps. PS5 will likely use a mix of high and medium and should look fine in the 30 fps mode. 60 fps might drop to 720p internal but thats just like every other next gen only game, and they dont look nearly as good as this.
SaiyanRaoh
Member
4090, 32GB and 7800x3D. Have everything maxed with DLSS , 4K, Super Resolution at 75, Ray tracing at Very High. Average is 70. Maximum at 85 and Minimum at 60. Looks like my 4090 will brute force another one. Only test I've done so far.
Last edited:
OverHeat
« generous god »
Topher
Identifies as young
Corporal.Hicks
Member
Medium settings, no RT, no FG, 4K DLSS performance (50% resolution scale).
DLSS ultra performance (25% resolution scale)
And here's what the image quality looks like with the 4K DLSS performance at the medium settings. The PS5 version will look amazing
.
btw. guys, DLSS quality at 4K is 66% or 75% resolution scale?
Last edited:
TrebleShot
Member
Exact same specs as me, ill try your settings.
Nah man our PC cost insane amounts of cash I would expect to be blowing the doors off most games for the next 5 years or so. To think that a 2k GPU isnt running this at 60fps native is ridiculous frankly.
I know they dont optimise for the top end but come on that is a bit silly.
I will have a go without the added RT to see what it visually looks like but I bit the bullet to get top end features.
Bojji
Member
66,7%
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
Celcius
°Temp. member
Oof, trying to run this benchmark had my 3090 wheezing for air.
Native 4K with all max settings = 7 fps
4K with DLSS @ 50% scale and max settings = 26 fps
I'm assuming the ray tracing is super demanding and unfortunately Ampere doesn't have frame generation
I need that rtx 5090... Ampere is showing it's age
Native 4K with all max settings = 7 fps
4K with DLSS @ 50% scale and max settings = 26 fps
I'm assuming the ray tracing is super demanding and unfortunately Ampere doesn't have frame generation
I need that rtx 5090... Ampere is showing it's age
Last edited:
Corporal.Hicks
Member
Thank you. I've been using 75% resolution scale in this game, thinking it's DLSSQ. But for some strange reason 66% makes no difference to performance.
TintoConCasera
I bought a sex doll, but I keep it inflated 100% of the time and use it like a regular wife
5800X, 4070 Super, 16GB of RAM, did a few tests with all the graphical stuff set to Ultra.
4K, DLSS + framegen, no RTX: 80fps.
2K, DLSS + framegen, RTX Ultra: 70fps.
2K, DLSS + framegen, no RTX: 90fps.
Kinda weird that there's barely 10fps of difference from 4K to 2K, and that RTX on ultra only takes another 10 frames. I could swear the difference was much more noticeable in a game like Cyberpunk.
I also wonder why they don't show any fights here. Hopefully the game's able to keep up those framerates when all the particles and combat effects are on screen.
Game's a looker but man, it also seems to demand a lot from the hardware. Wonder if it might be worth to wait a bit more in case they keep optimizing it after release.
4K, DLSS + framegen, no RTX: 80fps.
2K, DLSS + framegen, RTX Ultra: 70fps.
2K, DLSS + framegen, no RTX: 90fps.
Kinda weird that there's barely 10fps of difference from 4K to 2K, and that RTX on ultra only takes another 10 frames. I could swear the difference was much more noticeable in a game like Cyberpunk.
I also wonder why they don't show any fights here. Hopefully the game's able to keep up those framerates when all the particles and combat effects are on screen.
Game's a looker but man, it also seems to demand a lot from the hardware. Wonder if it might be worth to wait a bit more in case they keep optimizing it after release.
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
yeah, i was getting 22 fps average on 4k dlss performance and only 27 fps when i downgraded to 1440p dlss performance. i wouldve expected something better than a 25% uplift when reducing my gpu load by 100%.
willothedog
Member
Is this using the latest file versions of dlss/dlssfg?
FunkMiller
Banned
Enough of this maximised horseshit. Let's see what potato mode gives me:
I could probably get faster if I could be fucking bothered to mess around with the default card settings
I could probably get faster if I could be fucking bothered to mess around with the default card settings
Last edited:
GreatnessRD
Member
Why does this make the 5800X3D and 6800 XT look so long in the tooth. Jesus, I'm glad I don't have plans to play this, lol.No RT, max settings, 100% resolution
LiquidMetal14
hide your water-based mammals
I'm going to rerun my bench, way too many things going and downloads from Stein too.
Jaybe
Member
LiquidMetal14
hide your water-based mammals
Diseased Yak
Gold Member
Cannot do better then this
Yeah, same here, almost identical for my system with those settings, though I'm at 94 FPS avg for some reason.
OverHeat
« generous god »
maybe its a difference in boost speed on the gpu
Solarstrike
Member
time to throw this rtx 3090 in the trash
Set Super Resolution to 50%. Also note that Cinematic is most likely for future GPU's/CPU's, not current gen. New GPU's/CPU's are out this Fall per usual yearly release. Set your graphic settings to Recommended but keep your resolution the same OR set to 2560 x 1440p. It should be playable 40-50fps I'm guessing.
Last edited:
Agent_4Seven
Tears of Nintendo
Just turn off RT, set DLSS to 88% and lock the game to 30FPS, dude. Jesus
time to throw this rtx 3090 in the trash
Last edited:
Celcius
°Temp. member
If I set Super Resolution to 50% and turn on DLSS then my average frame rate goes from 7 to 26.
I didn't plan to buy the game anyway but was just curious how it ran and looked maxed out.
This does make me want to upgrade though lol.
Last edited:
SonicVolcano
Member
The Cinematic setting might be an UE5 thing. Lords of the Fallen has a similar setting and uses the same engine.
Solarstrike
Member
Cinematic, 3840 x2160p
Recommended, 2560x1440p
Refund's imminent @ Steam
Recommended, 2560x1440p
Refund's imminent @ Steam
proandrad
Member
Love to see it.
FunkMiller
Banned
I remain convinced that RT is mostly a scam designed to sell graphics cards. It's largely fucking pointless in a majority of games, with even the ones that do effectively use it not really being that much different to justify its existence.
Stuart360
Member
Well this was a nice surprise.
I wasnt even going to bother with the benchmark on my 1080ti after seeing the results here but i thought what the hell.
I can get 60fps at 1080p, Medium, with textures set to very high. Res set to 75%.
If ilock to 30fs i can play on High, textutres very high, and res 100%.
If i lock my tv to 50hz, i can get 50fps on High, textures very high, and global illumination set to medium.
Quite a surprise after the results here. Ray Tracing must be a killer in this game!.
Also for people on lower PC's, Global Illumination is the big killer here. Keep it on medium, or low, and you may be surprised by the results.
I wasnt even going to bother with the benchmark on my 1080ti after seeing the results here but i thought what the hell.
I can get 60fps at 1080p, Medium, with textures set to very high. Res set to 75%.
If ilock to 30fs i can play on High, textutres very high, and res 100%.
If i lock my tv to 50hz, i can get 50fps on High, textures very high, and global illumination set to medium.
Quite a surprise after the results here. Ray Tracing must be a killer in this game!.
Also for people on lower PC's, Global Illumination is the big killer here. Keep it on medium, or low, and you may be surprised by the results.
Corporal.Hicks
Member
I think the resolution scale in this game isnt working correctly, because when you start changing it, you can get totally different results even with the same settings.
Last edited: