He said in a defiant voice, without telling anyone if he thought the game deserved a better score, or a worse one. He then took position in the near bushes, a mischievous smile crossing his face, waiting patiently for someone to take his bait."Finished chapter 2. This game should not be at 82 metacritic."
Its ok.. im from brazil either and I didn't get the semi-racist stupid joke.It was a honest attempt at clarification, I'm a white guy from South Africa and if I had stated that there is something familiar about the protagonist how do you think that may have been taken?
Om opheldering te vra oor iets wat jy as rassisme beskou, het niks met politiek te doen nie, rassisme is rassisme. Ek is jammer dat ek jou verkeerd verstaan.
I wanted to post in the OT but ended up posting here. Didn't realise. And yes, the game is pretty damn good and shouldn't score so low. With Stellar Blade and this, reviews are kinda getting pointless as I enjoyed both these games immensely. Nice writeup btw.Can we keep the focus on finding out whatAuto_aim1 thinks of the game please guys ?
Because if you're really wondering who's the most racist between Brazil and South Africa, the answer is both.
It doesn't help when woke dumb dumbs bring the score down because there isn't enough diversity in a monkey game.I wanted to post in the OT but ended up posting here. Didn't realise. And yes, the game is pretty damn good and shouldn't score so low. With Stellar Blade and this, reviews are kinda getting pointless as I enjoyed both these games immensely. Nice writeup btw.
75% is the right score for your mom.75-79% is the right score for this game
Im from Brazil and i see no issues with it, the main protagonist feels very familiar for some reason.
People get mad if you use anything lower than 8,5-9 nowadays.My personal score is an 8/10. However, based on the fact that "average" games score 70-79, this should easily be 85+ or even 90.
Agreed. 5/10 to me should be an average game and 7/10 is actually a good game. In gaming circles, however, 5/10 is a complete piece of shit and 7/10 is merely okay. No point in having a scale of 1/10 if anything below 6 goes virtually untouched.People get mad if you use anything lower than 8,5-9 nowadays.
I like to use the complete scale, 7 is good, 7,5 is more than good.
I would say between 7,5 bordering on 8 would be my score for now, but i'm extremely stingy with scores, the game is great but it also has a lot of flaws that i can't ignore.
Maybe i'm gonna end with 8 because this is their first game so i can give some slouch.
Yah, like it or not, the paradigm that is largely applied to gaming scores is the same as American scholastic standards, full stop.On the other hand I settle for a "scholastic" scale where anything under 6 in INSUFFICIENT (to various degree), seven is discrete/barely competent, 8 is good and anything between 9 and 10 ranges to great to excellent.
I'm going to accept anything below a 8 for a game of this quality only in a world where we set the score for most of your unremarable favorites at 6, top.
I was thinking more of the Italian scholastic standards (which are the experience I grew up with), but yeah, I'd guess they are probably similar.Yah, like it or not, the paradigm that is largely applied to gaming scores is the same as American scholastic standards, full stop.