I mean if we can't trust the word of posters what is the point in this exercise?!
Yes, that's why she got many more votes and that's why you have a primary process. How else do you think a candidate is selected?
BTW, what's your opinion of caucuses?
Oh man, I remember the good things that came out of thinking an entire voter base was irrelevant!Quick let's poll another irrelevant private citizen. Do me next.
Oh man, I remember the good things that came out of thinking an entire voter base was irrelevant!
Good times.
Oh man, I remember the good things that came out of thinking an entire voter base was irrelevant!
Hmm...
��
Not to mention none of those mention Clinton but whatevs
Quick let's poll another irrelevant private citizen. Do me next.
Dude, that's lame as hell, you said you would give him 100 bucks to find someone saying that and that last poster actually said that, especially given the title of the thread, but then for some reason you don't want to acknowledge it or something.
That's super lame. At least own up to what you said. If you don't want to do it, then don't say stuff like "I'll pay you 100 bucks if you can find it".or something.
Anyways,
People saying that person A deserve Trump because person A dislike Hillary is a bit much, isn't it? Especially considering that I am perfectly willing to bet that many who dislike her actually voted for her anyways during the last election--it's too bad that the ones that mattered actually swung the other way.
Well I'm not a fan of either. Am I part of the problem?
Thread those are picked from is "would you vote for Bernie if Hillary loses the nomination" not "would you vote for Trump if hillary loses the nomination" when the poster's assertion was that Hillary supporters were threatening to flip to Trump. Hell, one of the posts just says "No." The one that mentions Trump is an obvious joke. Some people didn't vote at all or voted third party too.
Somebody lies about what they saw when we have written records, I don't owe them shit lol
yeah, bernie really shouldn't have dismissed the deep south
You mean.. The place that was going to go Republican anyway?
Huh...
You mean.. The place that was going to go Republican anyway?
Huh...
Bullshit reasoning and bullshit excuse.
If that was Bernie's calculus he wouldn't have touted all his wins in the Red-as-FUCK Midwest.
EDIT: Fact of the matter is there are Democrats (black Democrats, funny enough) living in those states that deserve to have a voice. And the candidate who listened to them coincidentally went on the win the primary. Time to get over it.
You mean.. The place that was going to go Republican anyway?
Huh...
You mean.. The place that was going to go Republican anyway?
Huh...
Bullshit reasoning and bullshit excuse.
If that was Bernie's calculus he wouldn't have touted all his wins in the Red-as-FUCK Midwest.
EDIT: Fact of the matter is there are Democrats (black Democrats, funny enough) living in those states that deserve to have a voice. And the candidate who listened to them coincidentally went on the win the primary. Time to get over it.
if only those southern blacks knew he marched with MLK!
MI, OH, IA, WI, red as fuck? Really? Those states had been won by Obama and were winnable in 2016 with a candidate who wasn't running a dumpster fire of a campaign.
I mean, it's true, Sanders lacked the Clintons' sterling record on civil rights, because (reasons)...
edit: Sanders did have messaging problems with regards to social issues and he deserved to be criticized for them, but a lot of the hyperbole about Sanders and black voters was pure nonsense.
Bullshit reasoning and bullshit excuse.
If that was Bernie's calculus he wouldn't have touted all his wins in the Red-as-FUCK Midwest.
EDIT: Fact of the matter is there are Democrats (black Democrats, funny enough) living in those states that deserve to have a voice. And the candidate who listened to them coincidentally went on the win the primary. Time to get over it.
What a dumb poll.
I don't like Clinton either, because of how she lost the election. I'd love to have her in the presidency though.
Exactly, and another poll in this thread showed that more people would prefer to have Hillary than Trump as President now. That matters more than this poll.
MI, OH, IA, WI, red as fuck? Really? Those states had been won by Obama and were winnable in 2016 with a candidate who wasn't running a dumpster fire of a campaign.
The problem was that a lot of people simply didn't know who Bernie was or what he was about until it was too late. The media is partially to blame, quoting from Bernie's page on Wikipedia:
This is fucking stupid. I ate all of this.
You mean.. The place that was going to go Republican anyway?
Huh...
There's so much animosity towards Sanders on the forum. It's really odd.
There's so much animosity towards Sanders on the forum. It's really odd.
Trump's America
There's so much animosity towards Sanders on the forum. It's really odd.
Trump's America
Yeah, and none toward Clinton. Really weird
Hey guys, the wind told me Hillary is running in 2018, 2020, and 2022 simultaneously. Is that true?
Yeah, and none toward Clinton. Really weird
Sanders has like fuck all to do with this tbh. But that's never going to actually matter in these discussions.
I didn't have much or any against Sanders before but I certainly do now, especially in the context he gets brought up in. The last thing I wanna hear about is hypos involving the guy who lost badly in the primaries to a lady that lost in the general.
Putting words in peoples mouths is fun!
Which would you say has the more insufferable followers here?
The insinuation is obviously that the anti-Sanders sentiment is disproportionate.
Do you disagree or what
Ed. lol, see
Honestly? There are equally obnoxious people here for all three; Clinton, Sanders and Trump.
Honestly? There are equally obnoxious people here for all three; Clinton, Sanders and Trump.
There's so much animosity towards Sanders on the forum. It's really odd.
Trump's America
It's still obnoxious. And makes honest discussion incredibly difficult.
Pretty much. I'd actually say Trump has the least obnoxious ones just because they are so obviously deluded.
It's still obnoxious. And makes honest discussion incredibly difficult.
Pretty much. I'd actually say Trump has the least obnoxious ones just because they are so obviously deluded.
...so you agree but are just being pedantic
I'm not going to pretend not to understand subtext