BenjaminBirdie said:
You're missing the forest for the trees here. As it stands, a lot of consumers need their HDTV set up from jump street in order to really appreciate it. A lot of places include this sort of thing, and that's certainly making in roads, but I've seen posts on this very forum of people who's job it is to do exactly that and are frequently met with disinterest from your average consumer.
You're mostly arguing for status quo, not really revealing the forest to anyone here.
How many DVD owners are really taking full advantage of what DVD Spec offers? Full, widescreen 480p visual? 5.1 surround sound? Regularly watching at least some of the extras on the disc? Even using scene selection on a regular basis? I doubt to this day it would be the majority, yet the majority upgraded to DVD nonetheless.
Why? Because the majority didn't really demand a format change, they just went along with it. The format change was set in motion by the manufacturers and studios who then found enough of an early adopter audience willing to invest sufficient cash in the platform to justify continuing development until a critical mass was reached such that they were able to provide similar infrastructure as the incumbent platform, with additional perks and only for a little extra cost. At that point, it became a matter of "why not?" for more and more people, despite whether they would ever actually make significant use of the benefits of the new platform.
Additionally, as I've said more than once before (yet unsurprisingly it seems to get ignored each time), one hurdle in this transition is conspicuously lower or completely missing as compared to previous transitions: the matter of backward compatability. Expect manufacturers to phase out their line of "DVD-only" players over the next few years as an HD disc player *IS* a DVD player, for all intents and purposes. The "why not" purchase will be here soon enough, just like with DVD.