All of this reads like either bait or you have no clue what you're talking about about.Not having an OLED screen for starters, even though I heard OLED was supposed to be cheaper to produce than LED after a point, which is why the Switch 1 OLED happened.
Not having every game be on the actual cart and instead cloud bullshit for some.
Switch 2 was the time they really needed to get wild and splurge, instead we got something way weaker than a PS4, which is well over a decade old, that sucks, we needed something in between PS4 and PS5, instead we got less than a base PS4 and this is the thing we're expected to be stuck with for at least a decade, that is very bad.
A 120hz VRR screen would be significantly more expensive with OLED. An OLED revision is definitely in the cards but I fully expect a higher price whenever that comes out. Switch 1 became cheap enough to produce to justify an OLED, that's why it happened.
With TSMC jacking up prices constantly I'm highly doubtful.
The Card situation I agree is lame, and I do genuinely hope Nintendo rectifies this issue (although allegedly part of it is due to physical media read limits with the cartridges, some games demand higher bandwidth than what cartridges can realistically use). But that isn't a valid argument towards the system feeling "cheap", its a completely different conversation.
Also calling the Switch 2 weaker than a PS4 is some laughable bullshit, it's pretty obvious that isn't true. It's somewhere between a PS4 Pro and a Series S, largely due to the newer hardware architecture and DLSS/Tensor cores. For a portable system it's pretty much the best Nintendo could have done for a mass-market product, it's more efficient than $1000 PC handhelds.
Again, what the fuck did you expect?