BenjaminBirdie said:
Am I the only one who watches this show?
Ben Linus, for example, was given numerous opportunities to make amends for the terrible shit he did and towards the end, naturally I was looking forward to seeing him better himself.
Walter White is human filth who has been given chances over and over to at least start to make things right and has done donuts over them in a Dodge Challenger.
Jesse is sympathetic because even though he's killed, he's guilty, he's trying to do good, he's trying to be better.
It's actually astonishing to me that you wouldn't be able to tell the stark difference between Walter and pretty much every other character in contemporary television. It's fascinating to watch, but he is resolute in his odious moral repugnancy.
So apparently, aboveboard moral repentance is the critical component in delineating the bright line between redeemable righteousness and, in your words, "odious moral repugnance." You're granting clemency to individuals, even when their actions are entirely disproportionate, because pangs of guilt begin to settle in as they approach the ends of their lives. This logic is not only so thoroughly inept, but positing it as a general rule of thumb for where one could aptly allocate their sympathies for television characters is nothing short of decrepit. Rather than maintain utter obstinacy in your fallacious stance, why don't you take a step back and compare the bodycounts of your paragon of television villainy and Walt, and then perhaps you can make a sound decision on which to vilify.
Even operating under your underlying assumption that of greater preponderance is whether the character desires moral rectification or self-improvement, Walt's ostensibly wracked with remorse and ruefulness over his actions (I'll point to
Fly as corroboration of this point, but evidence of this is littered quite literally throughout the oeuvre of the show). What "level" of making amends do you require before a character becomes a sympathetic one? Walt is pigeonholed into a predicament of a far graver reality than Ben Linus's, and his irresolution can not only easily be explained, but is symptomatic of the innate human condition. Ben was a sociopathic killer, dejected and emotionally depraved throughout his years, and somehow he's the sympathetic one in this debate? Please. Don't let your sweeping bias sway you into lampooning others for maintaining not only understandable, but justifiable and reasonable stances on Walt. The morally iniquitous one in all of this is so very lucidly Ben that even entertaining such a ludicrous idea is nothing short of total farce.