Tyrannical
Banned
Look at all the liberal war mongers in this thread, I'm shocked.
The US could achieve complete air superiority within hours for the cost of fuel, with no risk to any of our people or planes. Aid could then be airdropped easily.ElyrionX said:And an "invasion" isn't something as easy to pull off as you imagine?
Tyrannical said:Look at all the liberal war mongers in this thread, I'm shocked.
ElyrionX said:It's called Myanmar. Not Burma. I guess, asking journalists to get their facts right is a bit too much to ask for some times.
WickedAngel said:The number just keeps rising drastically every day. I remember when they were reporting this as a few thousand and look at where we are now.
How do you even begin to recoup after something like this?
Zeed said:Yeah trying to instigate another military conflict isn't the greatest idea for anyone, but something should be done about this. Really this is China's opportunity to step up, but seeing as how they're having trouble feeding their own population I'm not sure what aid Burma (easier to type, kthnx) can expect from them.
fortified_concept said:Your post wasn't just uncalled for it was idiotically uncalled for. Noone has refused that something has to be done in places where genocide is a fact even if that means limited military intervention as the last solution (don't worry the UN or whoever would help doesn't need to invade or stay there simply because they don't have to protect any oil fields/pipes). And please don't dare even for a moment to compare this to the disgusting profit wars the rightwing pieces of shit you love so much have started.
That would be a sign of war, so you might wanna carry bombsspeculawyer said:Yes . . . use the military force to drop aid instead of bombs. Go for it.
Tideas said:That is 0.00007% of the world's population.
Tyrannical said:Look at all the liberal war mongers in this thread, I'm shocked.
Myke Greywolf said:Actually, 0.008%.
You forgot to multiply the fraction by 100 to get a percent value.
Mato said:Their refusal seems extremely incomprehensible. Maybe the government might actually wish to decrease the population. For a twisted, fucked up reason they might have been actually hoping for a genocide.
Kaeru said:Fuck me.....
I hope this means the end of the regime on sight, they are idiots for not letting aid go through.
ElyrionX said:It's called Myanmar. Not Burma. I guess, asking journalists to get their facts right is a bit too much to ask for some times.
Hate to agree, but I cannot help it. I was going to donate, but my brain is telling me "fuck them then"dabig2 said:Fuck their government. Their flat-out murdering their citizens at this point by their constant refusals and bullshit. America's sharp criticism of the situation was mocked by others earlier in the week..... but criticism at this point is not nearly enough.
ToxicAdam said:Why are people buying this 500k figure as a fact? It's merely speculation or could be politically motivated by people who want to force the UN's hand to take action against the junta.
If we can't even determine the dead in Iraq, what makes you think we know the figures for this catastrophe looking from the outside?
BANGKOK, Thailand (CNN) -- The United Nations' top World Food Program official says he is "furious" over the Myanmar's government's refusal to allow the organization to distribute aid that was flown in for cyclone disaster victims.
Future flights have been suspended.
Two planes that landed Friday morning in Rangon carrying 38 tons of high-energy biscuits, medical kits and other items were seized by officials at Yangon International Airport, said Tony Banbury.
The cargo is enough to feed 95,000 people, he said.
fortified_concept said:Noone has refused that something has to be done in places where genocide is a fact even if that means limited military intervention as the last solution
okno said:I can't believe the extent to which this tornado has devastated Burma... This is so ridiculous, I'm just awestruck. I never thought I'd witness something like this happen in my life.
RumFore said:Does the numbers really matter? Fact is thousands and possible that much is presumed dead and they are stifling aid to the people because of harsh criticisms towards the military regime which now shows to have merit.
grandjedi6 said:Every English speaking country uses Burma officially and few recognize Myanmar at all. So its not surprising that journalists use Burma instead of Myanmar"
Kung Fu Jedi said:On NPR this morning they were talking about the situation and they said that the Myanmar government was accepting aid supplies, but didn't want anyone to come into the country saying they could distribute it just fine themselves.
Myanmar is how they spell "Burma" in Burmese. So yes, it really is Burma. The "my" is a B in Burmese, "an" is AH, etc.ElyrionX said:It's called Myanmar. Not Burma. I guess, asking journalists to get their facts right is a bit too much to ask for some times.
Shibby said:ToxicAdam has a point, how do we know that these numbers are not being inflated for the purpose of getting extra money by their government?
Guileless said:Even by your standards this is ridiculous. President Clinton was forced to cut short a visit to your country because of massive riots protesting NATO's Bosnia intervention. Whatever you think about Iraq, the war only happened after years and years of diplomacy and UN votes. Not even the most crazed neocon warmonger is going to go to war with a country a week after a disaster happens over the control of aid supplies.
Grow up people, if bad taste has any meaning then using something like this for political point scoring on the internets is it.
Kung Fu Jedi said:The U.S. couldn't put troops on the ground in New Orleans very fast to take control there. What makes anyone think they could do better in Burma?
Mato said:Their refusal seems extremely incomprehensible. Maybe the government might actually wish to decrease the population. For a twisted, fucked up reason they might have been actually hoping for a genocide.
I was previously confused about this is well. Is there a particular reason this one has been consistently referred to a cyclone? I thought "hurricane" and "typhoon" were pretty standard. A regional thing?Vicious said:People really need to stop confusing cyclone with tornado. A cyclone is the same thing as a hurricane.
Are you dumb? Just curious because that makes no sense at all.CharlieDigital said:Just curious: what would the US reaction be if there was a huge earthquake in California resulting in tens of thousands of dead and missing and China offered to send 100,000 troops, a fleet of warships, military cargo planes, and so on to help in humanitarian aid?
Yeah, somehow, I don't think that would work out very well.
Atlantic Ocean = HurricaneJoshuaJSlone said:I was previously confused about this is well. Is there a particular reason this one has been consistently referred to a cyclone? I thought "hurricane" and "typhoon" were pretty standard. A regional thing?
CharlieDigital said:Just curious: what would the US reaction be if there was a huge earthquake in California resulting in tens of thousands of dead and missing and China offered to send 100,000 troops, a fleet of warships, military cargo planes, and so on to help in humanitarian aid?
Yeah, somehow, I don't think that would work out very well.
From a state you have a near complete military alliance with...lunarworks said:Canada's army had planes full of rescue and and relief personnel and equipment on the tarmac gassed and ready to go right after Katrina. The US government said "no thanks", and proceeded to bungle it on their own for a while before finally accepting our offer.
So yes, there's precedent.