They're going to keep doing the same thing they're doing now, or worse start building meth labs like a bunch of them do. I'm not saying every weed dealer is going to not go legit or stay in business I just expect these people to transit to smuggling, since they already own the production.Joates said:What people in the hills?
They just snort painkillers and fuck their cousins.daw840 said:The wild and wonderful whites of west Virginia?
Jtwo said:Haha, when I was in highschool my friends and I found this place that was like a 65minute drive out of town and tried to grow plants there.
I think after the third time coming to check on them we forgot where we planted them.
elrechazao said:legalize it and this won't be a problem. Nobody sets spring loaded shotguns over their cucumbers or tobacco.
Manos: The Hans of Fate said:They're going to keep doing the same thing they're doing now, or worse start building meth labs like a bunch of them do. I'm not saying every weed dealer is going to not go legit or stay in business I just expect these people to transit to smuggling, since they already own the production.
The meth thing is more of a mentioning of the types of things these armed farmers also tend to do. I've read reports of people camping and finding meth labs.Joates said:I dont think creating more meth supply is going to necessarily equate to more demand as well... Theres a huge demand for weed.
And they will no longer own production if its legalized, so...
Manos: The Hans of Fate said:The meth thing is more of a mentioning of the types of things these armed farmers also tend to do. I've read reports of people camping and finding meth labs.
How will they no longer own production if weed is legalized (which I'm not arguing against)?
We tried.siddx said:This is such a tired and cliche response but I'll say it anyways. Make it legal and hand it over to a government agency. Problem over.
Joates said:Chances are, if the market is legalized, a massive influx of legal corporations would get into the market, as there would be plenty of profits to eat up.
Thus the corporations would likely control production (Shocking, I know).
Unless youre going to attempt to tell me the illegal corporations could do a better/more efficient job than the corporations at running shit?
Gallbaro said:Not familiar with pot at all, but, I cannot imagine their are any economies of scale for corporations to actually get involved with pot production. Its a weed that requires minimal attention that anyone could grow. Why would corporations get involved if their is no refinement process.
GoldenEye 007 said:Why are we talking about the legalization of marijuana here? Shouldn't the focus be on people destroying and trespassing on private property? There is no excuse for that at all. Whether the drug is legal or not.
Because cause and effect.GoldenEye 007 said:Why are we talking about the legalization of marijuana here?
Why would you buy your own land in order to engage in a massively illegal enterprise? I don't think you'd make a very good criminalGoldenEye 007 said:What's stopping these people from buying/using their own land? Is there a land shortage to the point that they are stealing and destroying innocent people's property?
Joates said:Chances are, if the market is legalized, a massive influx of legal corporations would get into the market, as there would be plenty of profits to eat up.
Thus the corporations would likely control production (Shocking, I know).
Unless youre going to attempt to tell me the illegal corporations could do a better/more efficient job than the corporations at running shit?
Manos: The Hans of Fate said:My point is these people won't want to abandon their profits and that they also won't totally need too. Honestly, I still think there was a movement by growers against legalization because they feared corporate takeover (which I agree would be better).
Yeah, I recall some articles talking to growers around Prop 19 claiming that the major Tobacco companies were copyrighting certain names of weed and buying prime land.Joates said:Say what?
Are you talking in reference to Cali growers and prop 19 or what?
Joates said:And "abandoning profits"? The profits will simply shrink as the legal market takes a large share of the illegal market away...
That's no excuse to put other people's safety, property, and reputation at risk. Sorry.elrechazao said:Why would you buy your own land in order to engage in a massively illegal enterprise? I don't think you'd make a very good criminal![]()
Somehow I think international cartels of murderers wouldn't care about your appeal to common decency.GoldenEye 007 said:That's no excuse to put other people's safety, property, and reputation at risk. Sorry.
Further, wouldn't owning your own land actually create less suspicion? Who's going to complain about things going on on your property unless someone is there that shouldn't be or if you complain yourself?
GoldenEye 007 said:That's no excuse to put other people's safety, property, and reputation at risk. Sorry.
Further, wouldn't owning your own land actually create less suspicion? Who's going to complain about things going on on your property unless someone is there that shouldn't be or if you complain yourself?
Haha, you act as though these criminals give a single Fuck about people they are hurting. You do know what a criminal is right?GoldenEye 007 said:That's no excuse to put other people's safety, property, and reputation at risk. Sorry.
Further, wouldn't owning your own land actually create less suspicion? Who's going to complain about things going on on your property unless someone is there that shouldn't be or if you complain yourself?
Manos: The Hans of Fate said:What about compared to the people in the hills? That's more what I'm driving at.
Gallbaro said:Why would corporations get involved if their is no refinement process.
GoldenEye 007 said:That's no excuse to put other people's safety, property, and reputation at risk.
I know they don't. Which is why I pointed out it is strange to ignore them and their actions but point to other things as if they're the victim somehow.daw840 said:Haha, you act as though these criminals give a single Fuck about people they are hurting. You do know what a criminal is right?
GoldenEye 007 said:I know they don't. Which is why I pointed out it is strange to ignore them and their actions but point to other things as if they're the victim somehow.
GoldenEye 007 said:I know they don't. Which is why I pointed out it is strange to ignore them and their actions but point to other things as if they're the victim somehow.
charlequin said:I am fairly certain that every pro-legalization person in this thread would be perfectly happy to legalize marijuana and still arrest and jail anyone who had engaged in illegal growing and boobytrapping on other people's property.
Where in this thread has anyone even suggested that these criminals are "victims?" That's insane.GoldenEye 007 said:I know they don't. Which is why I pointed out it is strange to ignore them and their actions but point to other things as if they're the victim somehow.
charlequin said:Nobody is suggesting that these people are victims; people are, however, suggesting that we use legal means to destroy their criminal business.
I am fairly certain that every pro-legalization person in this thread would be perfectly happy to legalize marijuana and still arrest and jail anyone who had engaged in illegal growing and boobytrapping on other people's property.
I would agree with that. However this thread isn't about the legalization of marijuana, which I otherwise agree with.charlequin said:Nobody is suggesting that these people are victims; people are, however, suggesting that we use legal means to destroy their criminal business.
I am fairly certain that every pro-legalization person in this thread would be perfectly happy to legalize marijuana and still arrest and jail anyone who had engaged in illegal growing and boobytrapping on other people's property.
GoldenEye 007 said:I would agree with that. However this thread isn't about the legalization of marijuana, which I otherwise agree with.
There was a bunch of, well had it been legal, people wouldn't have to do this! Instead of talking about the crap the property owners have to go through and the the thread being framed around that. Although some people addressed that before I did too.
Joates said:If the castle doctrine were legal, the likelihood of this happening drops considerably.
Zenith said:Funny to see so many people blaming the government for there being a law against it rather than the perpetrators. Setting up punji sticks and polluting the ground, they're just your friendly neighbourhood dealers trying to spread the love!
Zenith said:Funny to see so many people blaming the government for there being a law against it rather than the perpetrators. Setting up punji sticks and polluting the ground, they're just your friendly neighbourhood dealers trying to spread the love!
How very classy of you.elrechazao said:They just snort painkillers and fuck their cousins.
This is totally and completely FALSE. I won't divulge my exact dealings with dispensaries, but I can unequivocally state that they do not keep records about who they buy their weed from, who grew it, or anything of the sort. They routinely pay growers with duffle bags full of cash, and there is nary a paper trail to be found.Gaborn said:I wish people wouldn't spout shit like this without evidence. There is absolutely NO evidence that one of the most heavily regulated industries in the COUNTRY with a ridiculous amount of scrutiny would ally themselves with the cartels directly or indirectly. Every single bit of marijuana legally sold in the dispensaries (and that's ALL the dispensaries do, why risk selling some illegally?) is accounted for, we know where it came from and who grew it.
Javaman said:How very classy of you.
Apparently you missed the movie we were discussing and decided to be proxy offended based on your lack of comprehension.Javaman said:How very classy of you.
From my limited personal experience with this, I would say you're right. Some do keep records, but there's a lot of shady dispensaries out there.Satyamdas said:This is totally and completely FALSE. I won't divulge my exact dealings with dispensaries, but I can unequivocally state that they do not keep records about who they buy their weed from, who grew it, or anything of the sort. They routinely pay growers with duffle bags full of cash, and there is nary a paper trail to be found.
Last year, Mendocino County found that trespassing growers had clear-cut trees and destroyed vegetation, diverted streams and littered the landscape with animal carcasses, garbage, human waste, herbicides and animal poisons.
Software & intellectual property piracy says hi. Counterfeit goods is big biz.charlequin said:Criminal enterprises cannot compete on price with legitimate business.
If only there were some difference between digital copying, and fungible drugs.monchi-kun said:Software & intellectual property piracy says hi. Counterfeit goods is big biz.
There are many legitimate business being undercut by criminal organizations. Legalizing pot may not be a deterrent. For one thing, criminal orgs would still flourish as they attempt to skirt regulation that legit growers would be bound to.