wolfmat
Confirmed Asshole
you're not a douche.Rez said:not to be a douche, but tell me you're not waiting for some sort of insightful critical analysis from Game Trailers, of all places.
you're not a douche.Rez said:not to be a douche, but tell me you're not waiting for some sort of insightful critical analysis from Game Trailers, of all places.
but I feel like a douchewmat said:you're not a douche.
duk said:patiently waiting for GT review before buying, then gotta decide which version to buy.
Rez said:not to be a douche, but tell me you're not waiting for some sort of insightful critical analysis from Game Trailers, of all places.
Rez said:my copy came with a code. what is it?
excuse my ignorance, I've been on a total media blackout.
dralla said:im actually curious to see the GT review. after their uc2 review they claimed to reward originality and innovation, and a game that refines and doesn't bring anything new to the table would score a 9.3 at the most.
Rlan said:Anyone try their COD Classic codes yet? Are they working?
Eric WK said:Forced game chat is gaaaaaaaaarbage.
dralla said:im actually curious to see the GT review. after their uc2 review they claimed to reward originality and innovation, and a game that refines and doesn't bring anything new to the table would score a 9.3 at the most.
dralla said:im actually curious to see the GT review. after their uc2 review they claimed to reward originality and innovation, and a game that refines and doesn't bring anything new to the table would score a 9.3 at the most.
Jube3 said:Kind of a wierd question and it may have been answered but how are the night vision goggles, im genuinely curious :lol
Server disconnect. :lolVictrix said:
Linkzg said:MW2 will get a 10/10 on Gametrailers. Actually, there is no way I won't be let down. If it's a not a 10/10, then how lame is it that they have a review countdown? but if they do have it up, then they bend over for Activision (we know at least some of them do). Same goes for most sites.
And considering they've had the countdown and a section for the game on their site for weeks now, I doubt this will get anything below a 9.Ten-Song said:Yeah, but this game has a crap ton more marketing budget behind it, sooo it'll get a 10 out of 10.
boredofcanada said:Anyone else not able to get online on ps3?
Not surprised
The PC version isn't balanced for anything higher than a 640x480 resolution, sorry.VOOK said:Is it true you can't change the resolution on the PC version?
Why not? MW1 isn't all that long (about 5-6 hours) and the campaign is excellent imo.omg rite said:So guys, should I play through MW1 first before playing this? They're both a foot away from me.
No problems here, just played 2 games online (UK).boredofcanada said:Anyone else not able to get online on ps3?
Not surprised
The-Warning said:I'm predicting a 9.5 from Gametrailers for the hell of it.
They'll probably throw something like this in there: " MW2's core gameplay doesn't exactly do anything new, but the formula has been almost perfected here, besides the strawberry jam."
They'll also mention the short campaign, but say that this game is more about the multiplayer anyway.
boredofcanada said:Can't log in to psn at all.
Absoludacrous said:intro spoilers i guess?
is that lance henriksen giving the intro speech?
george_us said:Why not? MW1 isn't all that long (about 5-6 hours) and the campaign is excellent imo.
Modern Warfare 2 balances the spectacle and silliness of its single-player campaign with a deep, enduring multiplayer core, carefully covering its bases for players of all persuasions. But there is no denying it seeks merely to build upon the successes of its forebear while doing very little to expand its scope or redefine them. Don't be fooled by the airport scene, which reveals a developer trying its hand at something else, without coming close to fully committing to it. There's nothing wrong with that. After all, underneath the sheen and controversy, Modern Warfare 2 is a videogame. And yes, you can be sure it's one you want to see.