-Pyromaniac-
Member
I don't know about gorgeous but good god the netcode on Ps3 is so much better than black ops netcode.
Supa said:Is it me or does this game look amazing? Shouldn't be played on anything but large HD TV's!
OP: Any interest in adding a Modern Warfare 3 Intel Guide or Wallpapers? There they are linked regardless.
If you're talking about SP, yes. I thought it was REALLY bad in Black Ops. The enemies were just sponges. Feels a little better in this one, but nowhere even close to the satisfaction of something like Rage.IOnEI Falcon said:So does anyone find shooting enemies unsatisfying? I don't quiet know how to put it but I feel like I am shooting an empty texture. This is for all CoD games I have felt like this. In comparison games I have the most satisfaction shooting people in is Perfect Dark followed by Halo and then most recently Rage. Does anyone know what I am talking about or is it just me?
Jason Raize '75 - '04 said:I'm about to go through reading impressions but if anyone wants to save me time and surmise the opinions made here I'd appreciate that
Jason Raize '75 - '04 said:I'm about to go through reading impressions but if anyone wants to save me time and surmise the opinions made here I'd appreciate that
How I feel about it right now, played for a few hours and just got off it a little while ago:Jason Raize '75 - '04 said:I'm about to go through reading impressions but if anyone wants to save me time and surmise the opinions made here I'd appreciate that
Angry Fork said:k so I just spent a couple hours on it, half and half TDM and search and destroy.
1. 1/3 of the maps are way too small/dull/bad, 1/3 are okay/playable and the other 1/3 I could say I like. Nowhere near COD4 quality for me right now which is disappointing but maybe I have to play them a bit more to get to know where people's routes are and shit.
2. You get killed way too fast/easily, they need to nerf damage big time and I REALLY hope they do. Make it take 1-2 more bullets to kill. If you're caught out in the open you have no chance of turning around and killing. I primarily play Hardcore also so I can't imagine how much bullshit damage is going to be there once I unlock it, it'll be 1 hit kill for every weapon. (Or they need to increase the health, whatever is better for balance)
3. Pistols are nerfed too much, I've shot people 4 times in the chest then he gets me in 1 shot with the big bad machine gun, fuck that. Very frustrating.
4. Snipers feel useless because of the small maps, machine guns basically travel/zoom as far as sniper rifles without the scope, and the high damage. There's no fucking way it's okay for a barret to take 2 shots to kill someone and also takes 2 shots from any other machine gun. No. Snipers should be 1 shot kill and everything else a minimum of 3.
They're probably going to get me interested in Elite because these maps are pretty weak imo. It's like a modder made these or something. Most of them are completely even with boring routes, COD4 took chances and had interesting layouts. Anyway my main gripe right now is that you're basically dead once you're seen. In COD4 I distinctly remember you being able to have a chance to turn around if you were quick enough and get him. That's not remotely possible here.
Yeah, sorry I was talking about SP. And it's not that they are not rag-doll for me as PD didn't have rag-doll. I just can't put my finger on it. But yeah, sponges with no reaction is pretty spot on.vatstep said:If you're talking about SP, yes. I thought it was REALLY bad in Black Ops. The enemies were just sponges. Feels a little better in this one, but nowhere even close to the satisfaction of something like Rage.
Jason Raize '75 - '04 said:I'm about to go through reading impressions but if anyone wants to save me time and surmise the opinions made here I'd appreciate that
Game looks like shit. Gameplay is boring and outdated, sound design is terrible and multiplayer maps are congested and bland.Raide said:If you like CoD, you will like MW3. Bits borrowed from previous CoD games, plus some alterations to perks that make them good for average players to attain.
Angry Fork said:How I feel about it right now, played for a few hours and just got off it a little while ago:
tl;dr version - They need to either increase health or decrease damage assault rifles have. You can't fix the maps unfortunately but that'll at least make it more fun.
My main problem with a lot of the maps is as a sniper I can't get shots off in the beginning because there's tons of shit in the way, cars everywhere, walls in front of you etc. Like you have to run 100 ft. to get to a spot where people are running and once you get there you end up getting killed in 1 shot by an assault rifle, frustrating for me.
Raide said:If you like CoD, you will like MW3.
If you're coming for MP, wait until a week after launch or something. People need to learn the maps and good/bad builds need time to surface.Jason Raize '75 - '04 said:I'm about to go through reading impressions but if anyone wants to save me time and surmise the opinions made here I'd appreciate that
Brian Fellows said:I don't know about that. This one really has me missing Black Ops ATM.
Brian Fellows said:I don't know about that. This one really has me missing Black Ops ATM.
njean777 said:Me also, I wonder if Black ops will still have a health player base...
njean777 said:Me also, I wonder if Black ops will still have a health player base...
Mega Man said:Quick question- did MW3 adopt BLOPS run and dive ability?
Dresden said:MW3 is not a good game.
No. I kind of miss that, actually.Mega Man said:Quick question- did MW3 adopt BLOPS run and dive ability?
Negative.Mega Man said:Quick question- did MW3 adopt BLOPS run and dive ability?
Phonomezer said:Can't be any worse than the fuck-awful BF3 campaign.
johnFkennedy said:Not getting the hate.
The damage is the same as it was in MW2.
Ah. In that case I wholeheartedly agreeJB1981 said:No I'm saying my first impression of MW3 after playing the MP is why did I bother with the game. It is MW2.1 but worse. Maps suck, gameplay remains unchanged, nothing new.
Agreed completely. I wouldn't change the damage output on multiplayer at all. Also, I think the game is good overall. You can tell their main focus was fluid gameplay.johnFkennedy said:Not getting the hate.
The damage is the same as it was in MW2. To me the transition from MW2 to MW3 is the same is it was from Gears 2 to Gears 3. It's essentially the same game but this time it works, which is what I was expecting and what I wanted.
Brian Fellows said:Its not even close to the same.
I feel like there is either some funny business going on with the netcode or something because the guns sometimes feel like they kill me in 1-2 hits, even full auto SMGs. I don't just die fast, I die instantly. I'm going to stop playing matchmaking and go onto some dedicated servers and see if I still get the same bullshit.Kyoufu said:Okay, the high damage is getting old now. Gun fights are getting a bit meh when there isn't much you can do to react to gunfire.
edit: and this thread feels like the garbage thread. Can't tell the difference. :/
junkster said:Looks gorgeous on PS3. Whoever said it looks a full gen ahead of Black Ops PS3 wasn't kidding. Smooth as butter too.