TheFLYINGManga_Ka said:Says at the end that he'd rather play a 2D traditional Castlevania instead.
brandonh83 said:And I seriously doubt that Gabriel having a more traditional whip would go any way in changing the overall atmosphere and tone of the game as it stands.
Joe Shlabotnik said:You were most definitely doing it wrong if you had the leather whip for more than about ten seconds in the old games.
I hate reviews like this. If the game is good it should get credit where it's due.brandonh83 said:Luckily for him, there are about 30 he can choose from.
Teknoman said:8.0 Lasting Appeal
This is a giantic game with lots of replay value.
Teknoman said:I guess they're going to do a seperate one for the PS3 version? Maybe a .5 to graphics because of the better framerate.
[/I]
Teknoman said:I guess they're going to do a seperate one for the PS3 version? Maybe a .5 to graphics because of the better framerate.
360 version:
7.5 Presentation
A reboot for the franchise that throws away everything you expect in a Castlevania game and cherry picks features from other popular titles.
8.5 Graphics
A beautiful, richly detailed world that suffers just a bit from drops in framerate.
7.5 Sound
The orchestral soundtrack is exciting and reminiscent of The Lord of the Rings. Great voice actors are here, but their dialogue is melodramatic.
7.5 Gameplay
Combat becomes repetitive, but the quiet moments of puzzling and platforming in between are a lot of fun.
8.0 Lasting Appeal
This is a giantic game with lots of replay value.
IGN said:Items to find are scarce -- much less than in a typical Castlevania.
Teknoman said:I guess they're going to do a seperate one for the PS3 version? Maybe a .5 to graphics because of the better framerate.
360 version:
7.5 Presentation
A reboot for the franchise that throws away everything you expect in a Castlevania game and cherry picks features from other popular titles.
8.5 Graphics
A beautiful, richly detailed world that suffers just a bit from drops in framerate.
7.5 Sound
The orchestral soundtrack is exciting and reminiscent of The Lord of the Rings. Great voice actors are here, but their dialogue is melodramatic.
7.5 Gameplay
Combat becomes repetitive, but the quiet moments of puzzling and platforming in between are a lot of fun.
8.0 Lasting Appeal
This is a giantic game with lots of replay value.
So IGN actually liked the puzzle and platforming sections while the others liked the action more?
Also i'm really not sure what else could be done to make it more Castlevania. Its got a guy with the last name Belmont, uses a whip, features Drac and his right-hand man plus others, and its drenched in atmosphere with what seems to be a good soundtrack.
As long as I fight against bats, skeletons, werewolves, strange creatures that arent normally seen in horror movies, and the mentioned above...it's Castlevania.
Yeah. Here's what he said about Brutal Legend:RyuHayate said:Hm, judging by the text, the score should be higher.
8.0 Lasting Appeal
The Legend is a little on the short side, but there are plenty side quests to be accomplished even after the credits roll.
aparisi2274 said:When this was first shown at E3 2009, I got pretty annoyed because as far as I was concerned this was not a Castlevania game. I even think that Konami originally introduced at another show as just "Lords of Shadow" and then at some point they tacked on Castlevania, but according to the producers it was always to be a CV game, but who knows....
All I know is that as much as I want to play it, I still look at it as a God Of War style game, set in the middle ages... like the other reviewers said, it doesn't feel like a castlevania game.
I enjoyed what I played at E3, but again, it just felt like a standard GoW/DI clone... Nothing about it really made me say "Ohhh look a new Castlevania game" and I feel that that will happen when the game comes out. If people saw it running on a monitor in a store, and dint know what it was already, there is no reason why they would even suspect it to be a CV game... and that is what is going to either make or break this game...
TheFLYINGManga_Ka said:It's funny but this IGN reviewer is the same editor who reviewed Brutal Legend and gave that a 9.0!
Oddly enough, the Gamespot reviewer also reviewed Brutal Legend!
Both of these editors gave Castlevania Lords of Shadow a 7.5!
I have nothing against Brutal Legend. I like the game but I'm sure the general consensus on GAF would think that Castelvania is a much better game, right?
Must be buddies IRL, both the reviews even read similarlyTheFLYINGManga_Ka said:It's funny but this IGN reviewer is the same editor who reviewed Brutal Legend and gave that a 9.0!
Oddly enough, the Gamespot reviewer also reviewed Brutal Legend and gave that a higher score than Castlevania LoS.
Both of these editors gave Castlevania Lords of Shadow a 7.5!
I have nothing against Brutal Legend. I like the game but I'm sure the general consensus on GAF would think that Castelvania is a much better game, right?
DownLikeBCPowder said:Man, playing that demo sure made me want to do a 180 and absolutely not purchase this game. Has to be one of the least interesting demos I've ever played in my life.
DownLikeBCPowder said:Man, playing that demo sure made me want to do a 180 and absolutely not purchase this game. Has to be one of the least interesting demos I've ever played in my life.
Edge stands out the most to me because they're usually the ones that give God of War a lower score than those other big review sites.Maffis said:So IGN thinks the music and voice acting is great, but because of melodramatic dialogue it warrants a 7.5?
How inconsistent can reviews be? It's odd that gamesradar, EDGE and eurogamer all gave the game alot more praise, while they usually tend to be lower than the other 3.
Exactly! :lolNeoUltima said:Must be buddies IRL, both the reviews even read similarly
Teknoman said:I guess they're going to do a seperate one for the PS3 version? Maybe a .5 to graphics because of the better framerate.
360 version:
7.5 Presentation
A reboot for the franchise that throws away everything you expect in a Castlevania game and cherry picks features from other popular titles.
8.5 Graphics
A beautiful, richly detailed world that suffers just a bit from drops in framerate.
7.5 Sound
The orchestral soundtrack is exciting and reminiscent of The Lord of the Rings. Great voice actors are here, but their dialogue is melodramatic.
7.5 Gameplay
Combat becomes repetitive, but the quiet moments of puzzling and platforming in between are a lot of fun.
8.0 Lasting Appeal
This is a giantic game with lots of replay value.
So IGN actually liked the puzzle and platforming sections while the others liked the action more?
Also i'm really not sure what else could be done to make it more Castlevania. Its got a guy with the last name Belmont, uses a whip, features Drac and his right-hand man plus others, and its drenched in atmosphere with what seems to be a good soundtrack.
As long as I fight against bats, skeletons, werewolves, strange creatures that arent normally seen in horror movies, and the mentioned above...it's Castlevania.
TheFLYINGManga_Ka said:IGN review...uh...7.5?
http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/112/1124296p1.html
Same as Gamespot. Criticized it for not being Castlevania enough and borrowing too much from other games. Says at the end that he'd rather play a 2D traditional Castlevania instead.
Says it has framerate issues.
That said, Lords of Shadow also has framerate issues on the Xbox 360. It can drop when the action heats up -- or just during a cut scene. During one cinematic moment the game was literally chugging at just a few frames per second. Gabriel has a useful instant-kill move he can inflict on weaker enemies, but the game freezes for a moment every time he uses it. The game runs more smoothly on the PlayStation 3.
Phenomic said:Just saw an interesting article and totally something I forgot existed. Back at TGS in 2008 IGA gave us this teaser and we never got anything else other then that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcI6j0Y24FM
We haven't heard of it since Lords of Shadow and makes me wonder if it's Vaporware, maybe this was his bid for the Castlevania game that ended up being Lords of Shadow.
That said, Lords of Shadow also has framerate issues on the Xbox 360. It can drop when the action heats up -- or just during a cut scene. During one cinematic moment the game was literally chugging at just a few frames per second. Gabriel has a useful instant-kill move he can inflict on weaker enemies, but the game freezes for a moment every time he uses it. The game runs more smoothly on the PlayStation 3.
Gabriel has a useful instant-kill move he can inflict on weaker enemies, but the game freezes for a moment every time he uses it.
Graphics
A beautiful, richly detailed world that suffers just a bit from drops in framerate.
The overall score is the same though.miladesn said:
HYDE said:I hope Lords of Shadow is at least on par with Dante's I.
Maffis said:So IGN thinks the music and voice acting is great, but because of melodramatic dialogue it warrants a 7.5?
How inconsistent can reviews be? It's odd that gamesradar, EDGE and eurogamer all gave the game alot more praise, while they usually tend to be lower than the other 3.
miladesn said:
Actually, yes it was. There are several interviews with Dave Cox explaining how this game came to be.RyuHayate said:Lords of Shadow wasn't actually supposed to be a Castlevania title at all, actually.
HYDE said:I hope Lords of Shadow is at least on par with Dante's I.
IGN Castlevania: Lords of Shadow is pretty much a Castlevania game in name only. | http://go.ign.com/bzyd4f
I recommend Castlevania: Lords of Shadow, but not to Castlevania fans. Pretty much anything you would expect to find in a Castlevania game is not to be found here. But fans of combat-heavy action adventure games will have fun if they can excuse a lot of mindless button mashing and a couple technical issues. The developers have successfully adopted ideas from several popular games (God of War, Shadow of the Colossus, Uncharted, Resident Evil) but that also means this isn't a very original effort. In the end, I'd rather play a more traditional 2D Castlevania game, but there is no denying that this is a beautiful and enjoyable change of pace.
Read more: http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/112/1124296p2.html#ixzz10xRWPHEH
henhowc said:IGN gave 360 8.5 graphics and PS3 9.0 graphics.
So the game gets a lower score because its not just another 2.5D SOTN rehash?
I recommend Castlevania: Lords of Shadow, but not to Castlevania fans. Pretty much anything you would expect to find in a Castlevania game is not to be found here. But fans of combat-heavy action adventure games will have fun
Darklord said:I hope it's not that bad.
Phenomic said:This is always how this comes across to me. It just sounds like he only is interested in a 2.5D game, which I love to death don't get me wrong but you shouldn't go in expecting it to be like those that wasn't the point of the project, really just drags down the reviews credibility as I see it.
brandonh83 said:The Castlevania demo install sequence is better than DI.