This is basically the "Rings, Erneh" argument, only without the rings. This is not a good argument.
It's not a bad one in this NBA landscape.
This is basically the "Rings, Erneh" argument, only without the rings. This is not a good argument.
Curry has four all-star years and was good even before that. Even as a rookie on a shit team he was averaging 17 and a half and shooting 44% from 3. He's always been good offensively (and now he's all-time great offensively).Doesn't Curry have only 3 good offensive years under his belt?
Personally, I just see Leonard as a better basketball player than Curry.
Man basketball debate online is always a dumpster fire lol. Some of the takes in here smh.
Not a bad list, though. The two best players today (Lebron and Curry) are properly placed, so that's good to see.
Curry has four all-star years and was good even before that. Even as a rookie on a shit team he was averaging 17 and a half and shooting 44% from 3. He's always been good offensively (and now he's all-time great offensively).
Kawhi's great, just nowhere near Curry.
Maybe? I mean Curry is coming off two MVP's and a ring. And is having another great season.Durant has far and away had a better career than Curry thus far.
Right now, on February 18th, 2017, Kawhi is obviously comparable to anyone. He's been great. But overall? Nah, not close.nowhere near Curry? lol. Dude has been overall better this year and actually won a finals mvp. Curry choked 2 years in a row in the finals. Kawhi hasn't quite had a regular season year like Curry last year but the guy is insanely consistent and elite on both defense and offense.
Maybe? I mean Curry is coming off two MVP's and a ring. And is having another great season.
Longevity is certainly in Durant's favor if that's what you mean. But as far as peak Curry compares quite easily.
Sure, but what a player does in his peak matters and you're taking away any and all context (injuries, coaching, teammates, etc.). Longevity is great, but it's definitely not the only thing that matters.Of course I am. It makes no sense to judge players only by their best seasons.
Maybe? I mean Curry is coming off two MVP's and a ring. And is having another great season.
Longevity is certainly in Durant's favor if that's what you mean. But as far as peak Curry compares quite easily.
Right now, on February 18th, 2017, Kawhi is obviously comparable to anyone. He's been great. But overall? Nah, not close.
Also lol @ choked 2 years in a row and Kawhi "not quite" having a regular season like Curry last year. "Not quite" is an insane understatement.
Curry had one of the greatest offensive seasons ever. Wasn't even comparable.I wouldn't say so. Kawhi was runner up last year in MVP votes if I remember correctly, was on a 67 win team and won DPOY for the second year in the row. What Curry did was amazing but I don't think the gap was that large last year, and it's completely closed and moving the other way this year.
Andre Iguodala took finals mvp and what would have been Draymond Green last year had they won
Sure, but what a player does in his peak matters and you're taking away any and all context (injuries, coaching, teammates, etc.). Longevity is great, but it's definitely not the only thing that matters.
Huh? You're the one who said they don't compare lol.You act like Durant's peak isn't comparable to Curry's or something.
What Curry did last year was incredible but it was hardly untouchable. Lebron alone has had at least four seasons that match or exceed Curry's 2015-16 in terms of production.
Huh? You're the one who said they don't compare lol.
And untouchable? Not sure if you're quoting the wrong person here, but never said that.
As for Lebron, I think he's the second greatest player ever so that's not surprising.
I agree. I love Durant. Dude was averaging 30 ppg when he was 21.Ultimately my point is that Curry's season last year was not so unbelievably better than any of Durant's seasons that we should just discount Durant playing at a superelite level for much, much longer than Curry has.
Doesn't Curry have only 3 good offensive years under his belt?
Personally, I just see Leonard as a better basketball player than Curry.
They kicked Pete Maravich off and added Dwight Howard?
GTFO.
You act like Durant's peak isn't comparable to Curry's or something.
What Curry did last year was incredible but it was hardly untouchable. Lebron alone has had at least four seasons that match or exceed Curry's 2015-16 in terms of production.
It isn't.
Lebron has never had the offensive season that Curry just had.
Just tossing this in there, Billups was the best point guard of his era. Better two way player than anyone at his position and he sacrificed a lot of individual success for team success. The dude's not top 50 in terms of sheer talent alone, but he knew the game much better than anyone in his day.He's a good player. Heck he was a great player at one point.
We aren't talking great players. Hell Billups is a finals MVP and won a championship. He's not on the list. It isn't ever great player list.
It's top 50 of all time.
You mean scoring?
Lebron has easily had two seasons on par or better than what Curry just had.
LeBron is the second best player of all-time, the only other argument is Magic. Kareem's legacy is much better than we remember; he's top five but he's not as good as LeBron.
Dude are you serious? The whole point is that he's getting cramps to begin with. I've never heard of any other super star players getting cramps repeatedly in different years of their career.
Production is far more than scoring.Curry put up 31.7PPG per 36 on 66.9 TS%, Lebron has never had the combination of raw numbers and efficiency that Curry had last season.
His 2 season of comparable PPG (never had comparable PPG/36mins) both came from shooting 55.6 TS%.
LeBron is the second best player of all-time, the only other argument is Magic. Kareem's legacy is much better than we remember; he's top five but he's not as good as LeBron.
Wilt, who was my favorite player growing up, is absolutely not better than Kareem, Magic, Russell, or even Bird. His playstyle led him to bend the game at his will but not as much overall success as the aforementioned players.
Edit: also prime Shaq is the greatest player of all time. Get at me.
Extra edit: holy shit at the lack of LeBron love in this thread. You guys are nuts. Doesn't matter what you think of him personally or however many rings you want to toss his way, dude is on Mt Rushmore in this league. He would have dominated and won in any era.
Fuck, I rode Kobe's fandom forever, and as a player he's vastly more enjoyable to watch when hot, but he's not nearly the well rounded juggernaut LeBron is.
Have you guys ever actually watched some Wilt Chamberlain and Kareem footage? Slow, plodding centers like that wouldn't even be on the court in today's NBA that's why lists like this are stupid.
Put LeBron, Jordan, or Shaq in their era they would average 50 a game, put Wilt and Kareem in today's league and they wouldn't even see the court they literally barely get off the ground for rebounds...shit simply wouldn't cut it.
Yeah Kobe should be higher how quickly people forget. Curry should not be on the list he needs to put more time in.
how many finals MVP's does he have again... you know when it really counts and you have to prove you are the best player?