See, this is where it gets messy.
A few things to point out there: Mark Dice, is, imo, actually far right. There's enough plausible deniability where he skirts around it to dodge the label, especially if you don't waste your time keeping up with everything he says, but he plays enough footsie with extremists to make difficult to deny what he is and what he's trying to engender.
As for Fuentes, he's a supremely more charismatic and convincing orator than practically anyone else with his views. That said, he is a self-avowed political extremist in all of those -ists and -isms that the left liberally throws around. Similar to Fuentes, the left wing political elite (save for the most craziest nutjobs who have been unrepentant in their extremism and tacit support/lack of condemnation for violent extremists for years now) has disavowed violence altogether. Out of some mouths, such as Zohran Mamdani's, it is not taken genuinely.
Likewise should not be taken as slate-cleaning from the likes of Fuentes. He can give this statement, but he also says the following:
This is no different from "trans genocide" rhetoric and other left wing permutations. If you proclaim the stakes are existential, you're creating a permission structure that eventually ratifies violence. Fuentes is smarter than his followers, but that base alongside others constantly edges around fedposting with adages like "you're not going to vote your way out of this" or "Weimar problems call for Weimar solutions" to zero reprimanding.
And there are already people like Matt Walsh working up the lather to invite him and others into "mainstream" conservatism/right wing politics.
I don't think Fuentes is "literally Hitler", but I will not stand for the cleaning of his persona without pointing out reality.
Now they are attacking the wife, they are never satisfied.
So Chamberlain has since deleted the post for the following reason:
Good on him for doing it, and he's rigorous in further replies, but why he picked up this nobody account on Bluesky, which he undoubtedly doesn't use, with a post with zero likes and zero reposts is bizarre - unless you count for emotional reflex on his part, or the emotional reflex or intent to trigger it by whoever may have sent it his way.
Again, his boss has already done a good amount of this "no enemies to right" shtick that circulating ragebait and undoubtedly bot boosted agitprop/genuinely awful comments seeks to legitimize, and it hasn't taken long for it to bite him:
Do take a look at the replies. Fuentes' in particular.