• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Civilization V Brave New World |OT| More than Content Tourism

Haly

One day I realized that sadness is just another word for not enough coffee.
You could always increase the size of the map so there's more to explore.
 
You could always increase the size of the map so there's more to explore.

Is there a way to get them any bigger than the vanilla game's Huge? That's all I play on.

I haven't done much with modded maps, personally. I suspect they would have scaling issues with # of civs and turn lengths?
 

-tetsuo-

Unlimited Capacity
I restart a lot as well. But now the improved end game stuff makes it pretty interesting to keep playing. Plus, I am having a hell ofa cold war with Greece right now in my current game and it is just so god damn fun.
 

traveler

Not Wario
Diplomacy victories are so boring. I just sat around until it was about time to vote, at which point I had bought every single city state. I really have to try a higher difficulty. Maybe Emperor or Immortal. I don't know, but I can't shake the feeling that the game got (a lot ?) easier with BNW. There's just so many more ways now to salvage mistakes.

Are you speaking strictly about diplomatic victories or any win con in general? I agree that diplo feels like the easiest victory to obtain now, but I don't think culture and domination are substantially easier than before.
 
Let me know if this is weird, but its something I've felt since Civ V released, but is anyone else kind of disappointed with the selection of civs/leaders? That sounds weird, but I just feel like they've spread too wide. One thing I really liked in Civ IV was that some civs had multiple leaders that reflected a different time/focus of that civilization. Personally, I have this weird aversion to the "lesser civs." Zulus, Morocco, the Huns. I'd rather have like 2-3 different leaders/UAs for America, Russia, England, Germany, etc.
 

-tetsuo-

Unlimited Capacity
Diplomacy victories are so boring. I just sat around until it was about time to vote, at which point I had bought every single city state. I really have to try a higher difficulty. Maybe Emperor or Immortal. I don't know, but I can't shake the feeling that the game got (a lot ?) easier with BNW. There's just so many more ways now to salvage mistakes.

As I just posted, this isn't the case with me since Greece is going toe to toe with me in the world congress. We are going back and forth literally every single turn now for the last 20 or so years. It is why I had to stop my war with Assyria.

Let me know if this is weird, but its something I've felt since Civ V released, but is anyone else kind of disappointed with the selection of civs/leaders? That sounds weird, but I just feel like they've spread too wide. One thing I really liked in Civ IV was that some civs had multiple leaders that reflected a different time/focus of that civilization. Personally, I have this weird aversion to the "lesser civs." Zulus, Morocco, the Huns. I'd rather have like 2-3 different leaders/UAs for America, Russia, England, Germany, etc.

Let's get Barack Obama in there.
 

EMT0

Banned
Let me know if this is weird, but its something I've felt since Civ V released, but is anyone else kind of disappointed with the selection of civs/leaders? That sounds weird, but I just feel like they've spread too wide. One thing I really liked in Civ IV was that some civs had multiple leaders that reflected a different time/focus of that civilization. Personally, I have this weird aversion to the "lesser civs." Zulus, Morocco, the Huns. I'd rather have like 2-3 different leaders/UAs for America, Russia, England, Germany, etc.

You complain about lesser civilizations but want 2-3 different leaders for America of all places while putting down Morocco/the Berbers as a civilzation? Come on son.
 

Haly

One day I realized that sadness is just another word for not enough coffee.
Personally, I have this weird aversion to the "lesser civs." Zulus, Morocco, the Huns. I'd rather have like 2-3 different leaders/UAs for America, Russia, England, Germany, etc.
Lawwwwwwwwwwwwwwl
 

KePoW

Banned
Let me know if this is weird, but its something I've felt since Civ V released, but is anyone else kind of disappointed with the selection of civs/leaders? That sounds weird, but I just feel like they've spread too wide. One thing I really liked in Civ IV was that some civs had multiple leaders that reflected a different time/focus of that civilization. Personally, I have this weird aversion to the "lesser civs." Zulus, Morocco, the Huns. I'd rather have like 2-3 different leaders/UAs for America, Russia, England, Germany, etc.

I don't agree with that. I like all the different civs/leaders
 
Diplomacy victories are so boring. I just sat around until it was about time to vote, at which point I had bought every single city state. I really have to try a higher difficulty. Maybe Emperor or Immortal. I don't know, but I can't shake the feeling that the game got (a lot ?) easier with BNW. There's just so many more ways now to salvage mistakes.
I also don't like the Diplomacy victory as much this time. Before BNW, wanting a Diplomacy victory required building the UN first, which is hardly mandatory (and I don't think I've ever seen the AI Civs build it). But in BNW, World Congress is a mandatory thing that happens, and so eventually the World Leader vote seems to be inevitable. And so far, I like the World Congress and what it provides, but the World Leader vote acts as a time limit on the other victory types.

The worst is when AI Greek is involved though. Alex always manages to start off with a huge lead in votes due to his UA and him being very buddy buddy with most city states, and he always manages to propose shitty things like embargoing city states and making his religion the world religion. In that case I end up getting into a voting war with him and obsessively build up gold and do city state quests to get votes and take away his votes. And then I'm on my way to a Diplomatic victory, wheee.

I did manage to get a Culture victory with Americans last night, which I think is a great improvement over depending on the Utopia project. But unless there's very few Civs and the map is small, I imagine a Domination victory is probably very hard to do before the World Leader vote happens.

Also I like learning about more Civs and more historical stuff. Makes the world smaller but also more interesting. For the most part it's how the Civs work mechanically that's of most interest to me, so the skin that the mechanics wear doesn't matter as much.
 
Yeah, I think my policy is going to just be "If Alexander is in your game, just kill him first chance you get." World Congress is just too powerful a weapon for him.
 

Trigger

Member
Let me know if this is weird, but its something I've felt since Civ V released, but is anyone else kind of disappointed with the selection of civs/leaders? That sounds weird, but I just feel like they've spread too wide. One thing I really liked in Civ IV was that some civs had multiple leaders that reflected a different time/focus of that civilization. Personally, I have this weird aversion to the "lesser civs." Zulus, Morocco, the Huns. I'd rather have like 2-3 different leaders/UAs for America, Russia, England, Germany, etc.

Why are the Zulus, Moroccans, and Huns lesser civs?
 

-tetsuo-

Unlimited Capacity
Yeah, I think my policy is going to just be "If Alexander is in your game, just kill him first chance you get." World Congress is just too powerful a weapon for him.

It is amping my game up nicely. I had a firm grasp of the world congress early on and managed to get an embargo on his ass. I was getting really tired of Assyria contacting me every 5 turns or so talking about how my army sucked or how little land I controlled. They also kept bullying one of my allied city stes. So, as Venice, I got money and went to war.

We battled for a good amount of years and all the money I spent waging war let Alexander reclaim a strong grasp on the World Congress. With that, I had to stop short of wiping that Assyrian asshole off the face of....whatever planet we are on and get back at Alexander. I had to move spies to city states to try and pull some influence from him and a couple in Catherine and Gao's capitals so I can swing some votes. ALexander is trying to get his embargo lifted and I can NOT let that happen.
 

Vespene

Member
World War III just started in my huge world map.

1700s - The Zulus invade Madrid, and Spain falls. I step in and liberate them after a few decades. They are eternally allied with me but now lag far behind on tech. They always vote with me on the World Congress so I decide to shelter them with money and defenses.

1800s - Me (Venice) and Amuruca went Liberty, Carthage and Zulus turned fascists, and everyone else turned to communism.

1900s - Zulus invaded most communist states, while Carthage waged war on Washington.

1960s - After decades of on and off wars, cultural pressure from my civ triggers a revolution in Carthage, and the people overthrow the fascist and now follow Liberty. Now its Dido, Washington and me under democracy.

1990s - Japan (commies) invade Spain and my Defensive Pact Isabella kicks in, so I auto-declare war on Japan. Japan in turn has a Defensive Pact with every other communist country, so they all declare war on the allies (USA, Carthage, Me).

2000s - Carthage falls to the commie Shoshone while me and the US are busy in India and Japan. Eventually India and Japan surrender. Everyone declares peace and Carthage is left with one city.

2010s - The Zulus invade Spain. All the Allies rush in to defend. For some reason Washington declares war on the Shoshone, bringing the commies into the fray. Now it's a 3 way war with nukes. I'm using my foreign legion for a D-Day style invasion to liberate Carthage. The Zulus obliterate all of India with nukes. Every city state allies with me thanks to my Pact policy. I'm gonna try to win the United Nations vote.
 

EMT0

Banned
If he'd been complaining about the civs ingame being more about 'Country/Nation than a Civilization', I'd be right there along with him, but this is just....SMH.

Indonesia needs to be renamed Majapahit, Morocco needs to be renamed The Berbers, Carthage should also represent Tyre/Punic civilization, America needs to go, Austria needs to go and be replaced by the Franks, the Huns need to go, Denmark needs to be renamed The Danes, England should be Britain, and India should be split into three or four civs.

/end long and tired rant that's really all nitpicky than anything
 
"Lesser civ" may not be the best way to phrase it. Rather, I prefer civs that currently relevant. Guess its just my disinterest in ancient history. Post-Renaissance stuff is where I'm more interested.
 

kidko

Member
Question for all of your Civ fanatics out there: how do you keep from chronically restarting games? I just enjoy the early game/exploring so much, I find myself wanting to start a new game around medieval age. It's not even that I don't enjoy the mid - game, I'll just see a civ doing something that I want to try right away. So many ways to play!

I had the same thing too but BNR brings some really cool stuff in the mid and late game that I've switched to looking forward to the those phases as much as starting a new game. Well, I'm still in my first full BNR game but I'm loving it so far! I've also started fiddling around with handhelds while the AI turns go by since that little bit of delay can start to drag when it becomes a little bit longer. Archeology introduces a whole new bit of exploration in a way, so look forward to that at least.

Playing Morocco on Archipelago and the Spice Islanders ability is awesome. When world congress decides to ban a luxury I don't even care since I HAVE ALL OF THEM. Trying for a cultural while learning the system. Managed to get the Louvre and beat everyone to the punch sending out lots of archeologists but somehow that gahddam bitty from POLAND is still crushing it in culture while Alexander steals all the votes. Might have to introduce them to my Ironclads....
 

Hellcrow

Member
Played the friendliest civ game I've ever played. Everyone was just bro-fisting eachother, and a declaration of friendship spawned maybe 2-3 other, "yo bro, that dude is awesome. Keep up the friendship!" In the end I won cultural without a single war. The only war was on the other side of the world between Ottoman and the polish.
 

Trigger

Member
"Lesser civ" may not be the best way to phrase it. Rather, I prefer civs that currently relevant. Guess its just my disinterest in ancient history. Post-Renaissance stuff is where I'm more interested.

Ah, I see. I'd rather we have multiple unique civs than have civs represented multiple times.
 

DopeyFish

Not bitter, just unsweetened
I had Egypt tell me I sucked so I went and put a whole bunch of units right beside Thebes

And they're all oshit take Memphis- loved getting a city without even firing a shot

Then a few hundred years later they denounced me so I conquered them

I was in the information era... Everyone else was still in renaissance era. Barbs screwed them good. It was kinda fun taking out a battleship to scout while everybody had triremes not even able to leave the coast

One thing I found funny was I asked for an ISS and someone denounced me for it lol I was also denounced for asking for nuclear non-proliferation despite being the only person with the tech. I just didn't want to waste time building bomb shelters
 

Esch

Banned
Let me know if this is weird, but its something I've felt since Civ V released, but is anyone else kind of disappointed with the selection of civs/leaders? That sounds weird, but I just feel like they've spread too wide. One thing I really liked in Civ IV was that some civs had multiple leaders that reflected a different time/focus of that civilization. Personally, I have this weird aversion to the "lesser civs." Zulus, Morocco, the Huns. I'd rather have like 2-3 different leaders/UAs for America, Russia, England, Germany, etc.

That's cool. Thank god that didn't happen and Firaxis thought about us colored folk and decided to incorporate as many cultures and aspects of the worlds as they could.

t2_sticker-trollface.jpg
 

Haly

One day I realized that sadness is just another word for not enough coffee.
Influence degrades at half the normal rate and recovers at twice the normal rate.

Basically, when Alex makes friends, they stay friends.
 
What is Alexanders ability? Something to do with city states, I guess? He must feel the power of Venice.
Influence with city states degrades at half the speed and recovers at twice the normal rate. There were a couple times that I managed to get the degredation to 0 when I played as Alex, which was pretty awesome. I think I still needed to max out Patronage and apply my religion to the city states to get to that point.
 

slabrock

Banned
I swear everytime I start a game of Civ V I have Napoleon and Alexander on my borders, settling their 2nd city right up in my face.
 

-tetsuo-

Unlimited Capacity
In the Venice game im playing I had Mongolia, Assyria, Japan and Denmark directly at my cardinal directions lol
 

Enco

Member
Finally started my singleplayer BNW game.

Decided to turn on the music too and MAN it's amazing. So beautiful and calming. Civ is such a relaxing game.
 

Aureon

Please do not let me serve on a jury. I am actually a crazy person.
Wow, tourism is totally useless for ideologies at Immortal. (Was starting to see it at emperor too) The A.I. just have too much happiness and, despite having higher tourism and founding my ideology first- not even sure if that's worth anything- I'm getting some unhappiness from citizens wanting to convert. Guess I'll pick Order in the future so as to better align with the rest instead of making the choice based on strat. :/

Beeline for Hotel\Visitor Center\Internet harder.
It's problematic on Immortal, but doable.
Heck, with a proper civ, probably doable on Deity too - especially if you manage to ram through World Religion \ World Ideology.

Well, many of the victories people brag about on the highest difficulty levels are skewed on the player's favor through choice of maps. Archipelago or two island duel maps are significantly easier to win since the AI is twice as horrible fighting at sea as it does on land. It sends wave upon wave of unescorted embarked land units across the sea to get annihilated by your warships. Once the AI loses its entire army before it reaches your shores, it sues for peace giving you a couple of cities on their island as part of the deal. Those cities are then used as a base of operations to disrupt their culture and science victory paths, or to outright conquer whats left of them.

Military-based wins are cheesing by default - The AI doesn't know how to spam Composite Bowmen and uncare everything else.

Deity is all about cheesing, anyway. The last fair difficulty is Emperor.
 

-tetsuo-

Unlimited Capacity
Finally started my singleplayer BNW game.

Decided to turn on the music too and MAN it's amazing. So beautiful and calming. Civ is such a relaxing game.

It is until shit gets real. Then every turn is crazy and I can't stop playing. Sid pls
 

InertiaXr

Member
How do I get longer land based trade routes? I have my sea routes up to 45 hexes away, but my land is still stuck at 15 which is almost basically useless...I went through the tech tree and didn't see any 'allows longer land based trade routes' like there is a few of for sea routes.
 

Aureon

Please do not let me serve on a jury. I am actually a crazy person.
How do I get longer land based trade routes? I have my sea routes up to 45 hexes away, but my land is still stuck at 15 which is almost basically useless...I went through the tech tree and didn't see any 'allows longer land based trade routes' like there is a few of for sea routes.

Combustion or bust.
 

Borgnine

MBA in pussy licensing and rights management
Playing my first BNW (but also G&K stuff) as Celts. Went hardcore Catholicism and culture, things have been peaceful for about 300 turns. I wanted one last turn before bed last night and suddenly Haile Selassie, who I thought was my bro, declares war and drops a division on my southern border. I've got about 10k gold reserves though, I'm hoping I can just hire Blackwater to stamp this fool out.
 

InertiaXr

Member
Combustion or bust.

Is that seriously the first land route upgrade? I'm just now into Renaissance and that's all the way in Modern, is Venice's huge trade route bonuses almost totally nullified on Pangaea and Continents maps then?

Did you build Caravansaries in your land route cities?

I have a caravansarie in Venice yes, but it still says range: 15 plots, which is only long enough for me to reach 1 city state and 2 full AI cities.
 
Top Bottom