Those dang gamers not wanting to buy games
Its better to quote this to the new page in case some missed it.Dawg, a literal screenshot of a headline posted on twitter, shared without a link to the article
Who knows if this is a accurate recent quote, or a quote from last weeks investors call, just misquote to stir up clickbate. Great job in media literacy.
Edit:
""In today’s challenging market and with gamers expecting extraordinary experiences, delivering solid quality is no longer enough" - Yves Guillemot
That's the only source this article has. The rest is filler text and ads. Saved you the click.
Tech4Gamers strikes again as being in the top 3 most useless clickbait garbage N4G websites that clearly uses AI to extend one sentence into entire articles. I have absolutely no idea how they always get approved.
N4G User Sajjad_Hussain works for this site [blog, really] and constantly spams N4G with these "articles". He doesn't do literally anything else - doesn't comment on anything or engage with the community. He simply uses N4G to get ad revenue on this AI nothingness. Please don't click it and please stop approving this annoying bait"
There ya go. I did your homework for you. It's misquoted clickbate. Next
I'm not following.
Who should games be aimed at? Florists? Basket weavers? Joggers?
Ackchyually... They will complain because you can damage the gums and enamel.Imagine dentists complaining about patients brushing their teeth TOO well.
Agreed.Solid in this context probably means a 7/10. Glad even Ubi is acknowledging that their games aren't very good. 'Exceptional quality' should always be the target.
dude is basically saying we should do better
Have you fucking "seen" the Star Wars "brand" lately? Name one thing coming from the Star Wars name that has all hands on deck pumping out nothing but quality. Disney, nor ubisoft, have put out anything of quality for a very long time, and you expect either of these two to produce quality?Agreed.
I have nothing against 7-10 games, I play them all the time with zero issue, everything isn't going to be The Last Of Us 2 / God Of War 2018 / RDR2 etc I get it, but with the Star Wars IP, they need to shoot for the stars and have all hands on deck, that means all their teams involved to make sure it rock solid.
I'm enjoying Star Wars Outlaws for what it is, but its clear it could have been more and for as great of a job as Massive did, maybe they could have had more the help to add more of an "Outlaw" experience, like allow the player to steal ships like Starfield, allow players to hijack ships in zero G in Space etc, you can make it more like a Outlaw Star, Starfiled space cowboy type concept, while still remaining in that license as I'm sure Disney has their own rules on what they will allow or not.
that part should be in quotation marks, added.What does this even mean? Doing better is not buying their mediocre games. and that's what people are doing. The cattle eat whatever shit comes from the asses of guys like this.
lol im probably last person to give benefit of doubt to ubi ceo, but this is pure rage baiting bs, and of course gamers are farmed like the cattle they are.
dude is basically saying "we should do better"
I don't care lol Thats not even what the fuck I stated lolHave you fucking "seen" the Star Wars "brand" lately? Name one thing coming from the Star Wars name that has all hands on deck pumping out nothing but quality. Disney, nor ubisoft, have put out anything of quality for a very long time, and you expect either of these two to produce quality?
I find it strange people have a short memory on overwatch.
These statements are for the investors, and they don't know at what score a game is a stinker.75 isn't a "solid" score for a AAA game. It is basically as bad as you can get, with the reviewers still being able to work in the industry.
Perception often equals reality, regardless of what was actually said/done.'CEO blames gamers' is a skewed headline for rage bait. Here's the real quote by Yves Guillemot:
"In today’s challenging market and with gamers expecting extraordinary experiences, delivering solid quality is no longer enough."
Well, he is delusional if he thinks Outlaws is solid quality.He's not blaming anyone.
He's actually acknowledging that gamers are fed up of mid games full of bugs and if they offer these products they won't sell well.
Headline is clickbait.
I actually strongly diseagree gamers, at least core/male gamers are sheep.with how sheep gamers are today, you need to look deeper lol
Well, he is delusional if he thinks Outlaws is solid quality.
The above shouldn’t even have been a 78/100 or whatever they got. It’s a mediocre game for $70/€80+ so surprise it fucking crashed.
- Ugly MC for no foreseeable reason.
- “Boink” melee combat.
- No Jedi but only a single weapon type to use on permanent basis
- Mediocre level design
- Mediocre stealth mechanics with mandatory stealth and insta fails
- Bad animation quality
- Tons of bugs
- Game requires online activation and the version of disk can’t be completed without patching
- Broke save games for their $100+ tier “early access” customers
Angry_Megalodon "Imagine telling people that they shouldn't expect an excellent product" Thats wild, where exactly does he stay this? Like the exact quote and link?
I'm not following.
Who should games be aimed at? Florists? Basket weavers? Joggers?
No wonder the gaming industry is fucked. A lot of gamers seem retarded and overreact to everything :
"In today's challenging market and with gamers expecting extraordinary experiences, delivering solid quality is no longer enough. We must strive for excellence in all aspects of our work."
They're saying that providing a bug free, good performing game is not enough because gamers want extraordinary experiences and they must strive for it. Somehow that has turned into this angry mob.
Yeah that is some editorializing in the headline. Very misleading.i saw this earlier and i don't really agree with how it's being head-lined.
Yves Guillemot saying gamers have extraordinary expectations and that 'solid' games aren't enough, is to me not him whining but a call to action. He's admitting to shareholders that their games are only 'solid' (which means they're actually bad since a CEO has to overstate their products to the public). Thus they will need to work harder and release better games.
No need to feel bad bro.I'm starting to feel bad for these higher-ups. They are in a position where if they don't bow to the horde, they will be personally attacked into oblivion and their game lampooned by default by media controllers. But it's hitting critical mass where if they don't disobey, their product will falter. They can no longer depreciate the value of old brands in exchange for putting it off another day.
I'm not saying none of them are personally responsible or that there's an excuse for making a bad product. Just saying I wouldn't want to have their job right now, what a nightmare.
Details: Guillemot will forgo payment of about €310,607 (approximately $327,000) that he otherwise would have received over the next year. That will drop his compensation for the next year by a third to €624,824 (approximately $656,000), not counting additional stock awards that won't be available until after 2023
Ooook. What about Life is Strange? It was a cool woke game. It even had the voice of Ash from HAWP.It sold before it went full retard. I was there I bought it and played it a few years. It slowly then rapidly became a F2P wokefest that shed players while making a different character gay every time they wanted to cover up a mistake.
Great example of how we had diversity before woke. Overwatch was simply diverse (and it was cool) until the bluehairs commandeered the wheel. I don't even own the game I bought anymore, it's wiped from existence and replaced with this "sequel" I don't want; don't count my sale in your "gangbusters" number please.