Weenerz said:So which is it, 75 or 90 minutes lol.
I'm pretty sure my watch said 9:15 when I was leaving the 8:00 screening.
Weenerz said:So which is it, 75 or 90 minutes lol.
This is a movie about an EVENT, and NOT a movie about a monster. The monster isn't charming, isn't well defined, doesn't have many memorable traits outside of its freaky appearance...to call it an icon akin to Kong or Godzilla is totally off for sure. It's simply not meant to be that.
It's necessary to cut through the hype to get to the real Cloverfield. I'm not sure the way it is being marketed does it justice. The movie is interesting because it's so damn different. It takes a worn concept and invigorates it by applying an innovative approach. The style will anger and offend some viewers but, if you're able to accommodate the camera, the movie delivers. There are moments of high tension and the sense of danger feels closer and more real than in any recent motion picture. The missteps - the greatest of which is the interminable introduction - are forgivable because the payoff is strong. In some ways, Cloverfield gives the impression of having been produced on a low budget, but the special effects are first rate. The monster and the devastation it causes look real. We believe. And, ultimately, that's the reason why Cloverfield works - because this film takes you into the heart of the maelstrom and leaves you there.
Gattsu25 said:Rottentomatoes have raped their site's layout
Kris Tapley said:"Cloverfield" is probably going to stay pretty damn close to the top of my top 10 list throughout the year.
Gattsu25 said:57% at RT
Rottentomatoes have raped their site's layout
Yea, your friend is a pretty sad individual.topsyturvy said:friend of mine said the movie was shit when she seen it. she liked spider man 3 by the way.
What a disappointment. :/
Everyone else, for the most part, has loved it. All reviews from friends are going to be relative until the final critic reviews come out. And I still think this movie is going to be great. It'll be a love it or hate it movie.topsyturvy said:friend of mine said the movie was shit when she seen it. she liked spider man 3 by the way.
What a disappointment. :/
The way she reviewed the movie sounds like it was pretty bad, She's the typical movie goer that gets excited over big sequels and shit. she said basically that it was so "fake" in situations and acting. The way she put it sounds like the ultimate myspace/social advertisement. :/Iamthegamer said:Yea, your friend is a pretty sad individual.
topsyturvy said:friend of mine said the movie was shit when she seen it. she liked spider man 3 by the way.
What a disappointment. :/
topsyturvy said:she liked spider man 3
57% tomatometer. Ouch looks like this one is a downloadIamthegamer said:Reviews are in and almost all (with the exception of one) of my reliable sources say this film is sweet as hell.
from a bunch of crappy sites.acidviper said:57% tomatometer.
topsyturvy said:friend of mine said the movie was shit when she seen it. she liked spider man 3 by the way.
What a disappointment. :/
JzeroT1437 said:I think her liking of Spider-man 3 says more about her dirty whorishness than about Cloverfield's quality.
LM4sure said:50% on rottentomatoes!! OUCH!!! I was afriad it would turn out to be shit. Looks like my fears were well founded. I'll skip it.
It's pretty obvious that opinions will be VERY divided on this one, based on the style alone.LM4sure said:50% on rottentomatoes!! OUCH!!! I was afriad it would turn out to be shit. Looks like my fears were well founded. I'll skip it.
stupidest fucking post in this threadLM4sure said:50% on rottentomatoes!! OUCH!!! I was afriad it would turn out to be shit. Looks like my fears were well founded. I'll skip it.
Yeah thats happening. Doing full right up now.TheJollyCorner said:quick question for those that have seen it.
I'm gonna spoiler it just in case, but if I may ask for the answer to be a simple yes or no, I'd appreciate it.
The scene in the trailer of what looks like Marlena 'expanding' when the Hazmat guys are carrying her away- is that really happening or just some 'plastic tarp distortion' trick?
Thanks in advance.
TheJollyCorner said:The scene in the trailer of what looks like Marlena 'expanding' when the Hazmat guys are carrying her away- is that really happening or just some 'plastic tarp distortion' trick?
DETAILS DETAILSButtonbasher said:Also Heads up: The Star Trek Trailer was attached. It's hot.
There's a very detailed description in the Star Trek thread. It was an alright teaser.Stench said:DETAILS DETAILS
Buttonbasher said:There's no real reason for that title in the movie, they never explain it. Think of this as a Project Bluebook esque deal.
Prince of Space said:Pretty good (virtually spoiler-free) review up here.
t's necessary to cut through the hype to get to the real Cloverfield. I'm not sure the way it is being marketed does it justice. The movie is interesting because it's so damn different. It takes a worn concept and invigorates it by applying an innovative approach. The style will anger and offend some viewers but, if you're able to accommodate the camera, the movie delivers. There are moments of high tension and the sense of danger feels closer and more real than in any recent motion picture. The missteps - the greatest of which is the interminable introduction - are forgivable because the payoff is strong. In some ways, Cloverfield gives the impression of having been produced on a low budget, but the special effects are first rate. The monster and the devastation it causes look real. We believe. And, ultimately, that's the reason why Cloverfield works - because this film takes you into the heart of the maelstrom and leaves you there.
This is true.Absinthe said:If you've seen the teasers then you've seen the whole film.
Spotless Mind said:This is true.