O-o. oh yeah I'm seeing this.SpudBud said:SPOILERS!!!!!!!!!
The scene with the tiny monsters! Do not watch if you don't want to be spoiled!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6G5tuUXenV8
SpudBud said:SPOILERS!!!!!!!!!
The scene with the tiny monsters! Do not watch if you don't want to be spoiled!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6G5tuUXenV8
Awesome.jtardiou said:
my cursor is hovering over this link...i have no strength to click itjtardiou said:
Don't, it's not a good look at it anyway.Maggot9 said:my cursor is hovering over this link...i have no strength to click it
Gattsu25 said:http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/cloverfield/
24 reviews total
17 fresh / 7 rotten
71% so far
faux-edit: It's funny, in terms of games, I don't care about aggregate review scores...but in terms of movies, I trust RT more or less
No, you inane douche. 'More or less' being merely a figure of speech. If I'm unsure about the quality of a movie I'll check RT plus read the reviews from a few of my favorite critics.TemplaerDude said:more being when you agree with it and less being when you don't, right?
Maggot9 said:my cursor is hovering over this link...i have no strength to click it
Lonestar said:Now a youtube video of that animated gif, plus a few more seconds of what happens after said gif. Seems to be slightly slowed down.
DO NOT CLICK IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO BE SPOILED!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtQXq6yylpk
FooTemps said:-The monster kinda looks like a chimeran monster from resistance IMO
FooTemps said:It was far too polarized between styles; you'd get iconic shots right after a "hey i'm an amateur so look at me fail at filming" shot. Probably only people who have done video production or camera work will notice that stuff though.
jtardiou said:I was pleasantly surprised to be honest when I clicked on the .GIF of the monster. I know this movie is going to be garbage, but at least now I know the monster doesn't look fucking retarded. Movie is still going to blow, my friends are making me go to midnight showing tonight =[ It kills me to hear them talk about this movie like a bunch of little girls :-[
JayDubya said:85 minutes? Short movie is short. >_<
Crushed said:Probably because Hud IS an amateur, meaning that, like most aspiring amateurs in any art, he's spontaneously trying to imitate camera work at times. He's running around, just filming whatever he sees, next he suddenly thinks, "oh man this shot would work so perfectly right now like in a movie," so he tries to do that.
Nearly every piece of artwork is a mishmash of good and mediocre; it's just that the mediocre usually gets edited out before release to create consistency. For some odd reason, a monster attacking the city preventing them from doing so.
Flynn said:Half Life 2 fans. Try and confirm that the radio sound towards the end of the movie is similar or identical to the combine police radios. I think it's a direct reference, but would like to get additional confirmations.
FooTemps said:It's just stuff like that really took me out of my suspension of disbelief.
michaeld said:I bet there will be a sequel to tie up the story shot like a normal movie.
I know what you're talking about. It didn't sound exactly like it, but similar.Flynn said:Half Life 2 fans. Try and confirm that the radio sound towards the end of the movie is similar or identical to the combine police radios. I think it's a direct reference, but would like to get additional confirmations.
The whole Rubbing on building things is subtle. You can't really tell what its doing.Lonestar said:But not the whole "monster has X-tasy attack, rubbing on buildings" part, right?
Lonestar said:But not the whole "monster has X-tasy attack, rubbing on buildings" part, right?
FooTemps said:It's just stuff like that really took me out of my suspension of disbelief.
True story: Our showing started late because the film was loaded backward We were sitting and it started with credits going down. We ran up to the projector room, and got it corrected just before the credits ended. Otherwise we would have seen the ending first...:lolFlynn said:I couldn't get over the fact that what we were seeing was just the illusion of motion -- a bunch of still images shown in succession to create a false sense that things are actually moving around on screen. And the whole audience was just sitting there believing it the WHOLE TIME!
Flynn said:I couldn't get over the fact that what we were seeing was just the illusion of motion -- a bunch of still images shown in succession to create a false sense that things are actually moving around on screen. And the whole audience was just sitting there believing it the WHOLE TIME!