JJ Abrams is the scapegoat for all the shitty writers at Bad Robot. He gets the blunt end of the blame because he is the most prominent one among them. Besides I had no problem with the directing, the film looked great and the cinematography was excellent.EviLore said:I guess directing credit isn't worth much anymore, huh? I don't see any reason for Abrams shouldering all the weight of this film's reception other than people knowing him better than Matt Reeves. Seems the two of them have a strong collaborative history dating back to their teenage years, too.
Spotless Mind said:I get what The Storyteller is saying. The characters only continue to be in this disastrous situation, because they want to save the love interest. I don't think it is that hard to understand why he'd dislike it, since Rob's motivation was poorly developed and every action he and the other characters make throughout the film directly relates back it. The characters at no point before rescuing her took actions that endeared me to them (Marlena saving Hud, was the only such real incidence). They were basically ciphers rambling through set piece after awesome set piece, because of some character named Beth that i don't care about. They were dimensionless and the film suffered for it.
Iamthegamer said:The Host....easily more contrived than Cloverfield, I'm sorry.
Is it really that much worse than any other contrivance the writers might have come up with, though? If they couldn't escape because the bridges were all taken out or their path was blocked by too much rubble....would it really have improved the film to any significant extent? That's what I was essentially getting at. IMO, one contrivance is pretty much as good as another. And whether they settled on destroyed bridges/tunnels or a romantic angle as the obstacle, your opinion towards the characters would have been pretty much the same. Therefore, the romance (what little there is) isn't really what is bringing the film down. It's just a scapegoat for what you consider to be insufficient character development.Spotless Mind said:The characters only continue to be in this disastrous situation, because they want to save the love interest.
From what was presented in the film, you would be lead to believe the monster was what crashed in the water... From what other people here tell me, it is a Tagruato satellite or some such bullshit, that was linked in with the online game! Yes, can you believe it! Something from the final seconds of the film that has a LOT of people wondering, is merely a gimmicky link back to a marketing game. What fantastic writing this is!Nutter said:Just came back after watching it.
One question and/or observation.
At the end when it cuts to rob and beth on the beach, does the monster fall in the ocean in the background? I saw something fall. And also the Monster that killed the camera dude, was that another one or the same one?
Skuld said:I've got a question
When they finally get to Beth's apartment, and she is impaled on the piece of rebar, wouldn't she have bled out when they pulled her off? I thought you were never supposed to remove something that's impaling someone, or they would bleed to death
they tied something around her to stop (some) of the bleeding. In most circumstances, no, you're not suppose to pull it out. It didn't seem like it punctured her lungs or heart. Just her upper shoulder.Skuld said:I've got a question
When they finally get to Beth's apartment, and she is impaled on the piece of rebar, wouldn't she have bled out when they pulled her off? I thought you were never supposed to remove something that's impaling someone, or they would bleed to death
Phoenix said:Did everyone get Iron Man and Star Trek trailers in front of their movie?
The music kicks in later in the credits.bluemax said:I didn't get Star Trek, but I did get Iron Man and shitty ass 10,000 BC. Also I got no end credit music, just silence. But I left pretty early into the credits because my GF was feeling sick.
People keep saying this, but did they really stay until the end credits rolled? The first couple minutes are silence, but once the credits actually roll (read: names move upward from the bottom of the screen to the top), there is most definitely music.bluemax said:Also I got no end credit music, just silence.
border said:People keep saying this, but did they really stay until the end credits rolled? The first couple minutes are silence, but once the credits actually roll (read: names move upward from the bottom of the screen to the top), there is most definitely music.
I doubt it. It's probably cheaper to get a cameraman than it is to get an actor, so chances are they just had some other dude hold the camera for any sequence where Hud wasn't going to be in the scene.Scarecrow said:Did the actor that played Hud also act as the film's camera man? Was he literally the only guy operating the movie's camera?
Scarecrow said:Did the actor that played Hud also act as the film's camera man? Was he literally the only guy operating the movie's camera?
:lol I guess that explains it.EviLore said:Camera and Electrical Department
Bill Almeida .... rigging gaffer: New York
Robert Reed Altman .... camera operator
John Billeci .... best boy: New York
Joe Buscaglia .... additional first assistant camera
Sean Devine .... camera grip
Matt Guiza .... second assistant camera
Gary Kangrga .... key rigging grip
Clay Liversidge .... gaffer: New York
Chris Shadley .... key video assist
Rick A. West .... gaffer
Captain Jebus said:Don't know if anyone is with me, butAm I the only one?The scene with Hud, Rob, and beth in the helo when it was spinning out of control and Hud was begging God gave me chills
Captain Jebus said:I loved the movie. Thought it was great.
Don't know if anyone is with me, butAm I the only one?The scene with Hud, Rob, and beth in the helo when it was spinning out of control and Hud was begging God gave me chills
movie should have ended at that point.Captain Jebus said:I loved the movie. Thought it was great.
Don't know if anyone is with me, butAm I the only one?The scene with Hud, Rob, and beth in the helo when it was spinning out of control and Hud was begging God gave me chills
KevinCow said:after everything that happened, the chick they went back for died anyway? So if they had just left in the first place, she still would have died, but they would have survived.
The Host starts out damn great, but then it just becomes fucking ridiculous and messy. I think Cloverfield is the better film by far.Iamthegamer said:The Host....easily more contrived than Cloverfield, I'm sorry.
Scrow said:even if they left her there she may have lived. who knows?
I specifically looked for shit like this when I found out Abrams had something to do with it AND that Rob was going away to Japan, and I didn't notice anything <_<robochimp said:Did anyone else see the Dharma Logo pop in for a few frames when the tape is queing up in the beginning? I could have sworn I saw it
Never noticed a Dharma logo myself. I don't watch Lost and I don't care for it, so the less this film has to do with Lost, the better I think it's just better as a standalone thing.robochimp said:Did anyone else see the Dharma Logo pop in for a few frames when the tape is queing up in the beginning? I could have sworn I saw it
eXxy said:Reading comprehension FTL.
Also, while I understand people being frustrated with the lack of answers, sometimes a mystery just being that -- a mystery -- is fun. X-Files strung its mythologies for nine seasons and even though they didn't come to a satisfying conclusion, can someone point to many abstract mythos that do? Some people just don't get it. Whether you buy into that, it's a testament to Abrams that even the haters keep coming back.
The audio clip was not worth staying for.Captain N said:I'm going to go see this movie in just a few minute..any reason to stay after the credits?
effzee said:i dont get it...if there is no love story then rob never goes back for beth and they never get stuck in the mess and the movie just ends with them going into the helicopter.
or that they get into a helicopter or whatever and then the rest of the movie is the army trying to kill the monster. which ppl would complain about and say ohh it was so typical...independence day type of a movie.
the love interest was needed to basically have a movie. i dont get where ppl say its so unbelievable. take out love for a girl and insert a relative or say your parents? you can not see someone going back for someone they love so much?
THANK YOU! About time somebody else stopped riding its jock. I don't even know how people think the film is perfect - the monster is sweet and some action scenes are great, but uhhh "Oh no, there no bullets in my gun, I didn't check before I fired ARRRRR" "I'm a gymnast so I can face down thi-OOOOOH my head". It had some funny moments, exhilarating moments, totally lame moments, and pure meh moments. It really seemed like 6 directors made The Host. Overall, 6/10, but I'd only recommend it to people to watch for free on TV or something.hirokazu said:The Host starts out damn great, but then it just becomes fucking ridiculous and messy. I think Cloverfield is the better film by far.
KevinCow said:Does anyone else find it somewhat depressing thatafter everything that happened, the chick they went back for died anyway? So if they had just left in the first place, she still would have died, but they would have survived. So the entire thing was for nothing.
Black_Ice said:Question: Does anything happen after the end credits?
yes,Black_Ice said:Question: Does anything happen after the end credits?
Well he did for several scenes:Scarecrow said::lol I guess that explains it.
I figured it was profesionally done, but a recent AotS with the movie actors led me to believe that the guy did the filming himself.
A key solution turned out to be a fairly obvious one: have actor T.J. Miller, who plays Hud, operate the camera himself, which he did for a number of sequences. “T.J. actually operated a lot,” explains Bonvillain. “He was always joking that he should have gotten his union card for all the work he did.”
Having Miller operate the camera had several advantages. “For one thing, he had good instincts of what to do, because he is Hud,” Bonvillain continues. “Also, having him operate helped us make sure we were providing the right eyeline for the other actors in the scene, so that it felt correct when people were talking to him.”
"I wasn't just an actor," Miller says. "In some ways, I was a cameraman, and in most ways, I was a voice-over artist." The experience was, as one would expect, a bit daunting at times, he admits. "It was hard. You know, I'm thinking about camera movement, and 'Do I shoot over here?,' and they'd come in and say 'Okay, we need you to tilt up and then pan left after her line.' And I'm thinking 'Okay, cool. And how about the acting? Was that good?' It was a lot to juggle."
If one of the professional camera operators was shooting a scene, Miller would often stand behind him with his hands on the operator’s shoulders, again, to provide an appropriately realistic eyeline for his fellow cast members. And, in the instances during which the operator had to physically interact with one of the actors as if he were Hud, he would don Miller’s costume.
I think the genre bending nature of it was what made it so good. It was equal parts great horror, comedy, action with some awesome deliberately cheesy moments and interesting social commentary. I by no means think it was perfect. It had enormous pacing problems, but the characters were superbly written and i never once questioned why the hell they would want to go back and save the girl. The relationships were entirely believable and i was invested in what happened to them, unlike in Cloverfield. It also explains the origins of the monster in a satisfying way and it isn't the slightest bit cryptic about it, which is a plus.Iamthegamer said:THANK YOU! About time somebody else stopped riding its jock. I don't even know how people think the film is perfect - the monster is sweet and some action scenes are great, but uhhh "Oh no, there no bullets in my gun, I didn't check before I fired ARRRRR" "I'm a gymnast so I can face down thi-OOOOOH my head". It had some funny moments, exhilarating moments, totally lame moments, and pure meh moments. It really seemed like 6 directors made The Host. Overall, 6/10, but I'd only recommend it to people to watch for free on TV or something.