I feel like you made things harder on yourself mre by making it COVER vs NO COVER. That is going to be hard to scan for.
Simply having people list the teams they think will "win" against the spread or changing the words to something more easily distinguishable should help you compare lists to the real results.
So instead of COVER and NO COVER, do COVER and MISS or something. Just a suggestion.
Simply having people list the teams they think will "win" against the spread or changing the words to something more easily distinguishable should help you compare lists to the real results.
So instead of COVER and NO COVER, do COVER and MISS or something. Just a suggestion.