Facism said:HOLY SHIT MEXICO HOW DO YOU NOT PASS TO THE OPEN GUY WHEN ON THAT ATTACK.
Facism said:HOLY SHIT MEXICO HOW DO YOU NOT PASS TO THE OPEN GUY WHEN ON THAT ATTACK.
striKeVillain! said:Best game of the tournament so far.
Oveja Negra said:The Ugly:
- Mexican coach and his Bat Tactic. Shame on you, no matter how young this kids, teams like this one destroy the beauty of the game.
Yup, the referees use that in Brazil.-bakalhau- said:Interesting, the referee marks 2 lines in free kicks with that spray, that's an easy way to let players know that they have to respect those 2 lines and can't be smartasses and try to move forward after the referee positons them. Nice little touch.
So yeah let Chile make 5 or 6 goals on us just to play decent football. There is no choice. I can bet that Chile would also play like this Mexican team if they had to play with an under 22, with another 8 players dropped out the week of. Im proud of the team, they HAD to play like this.Oveja Negra said:The Good:
- We won.
- Fantastic goal by Vidal.
The Bad:
Too many chances missed. An experienced team will not forgive us that.
The Ugly:
- Mexican coach and his Bat Tactic. Shame on you, no matter how young this kids, teams like this one destroy the beauty of the game.
-bakalhau- said:Interesting, the referee marks 2 lines in free kicks with that spray, that's an easy way to let players know that they have to respect those 2 lines and can't be smartasses and try to move forward after the referee positons them. Nice little touch.
Regulus Tera said:What the fuck else did you want us to do? Any other tactics and we would have lost by a huge margin -we should have lost by a huge margin. If we have any chances to go to the second round we need to maintain the goal difference low.
That's what happens when you have to send your U-22 team and you cut eight players a week before the tournament including five starters not much to do but hope for the best, considering this is the first game this team plays there wasn't much to do but that.Oveja Negra said:The Ugly:
- Mexican coach and his Bat Tactic. Shame on you, no matter how young these kids, teams like this one destroy the beauty of the game.
Chile, since Bielsa, plays like that.-x.Red.x- said:is it me or chile tried to emulate barca???
Oveja Negra said:I see your point but I'm speaking more than a chilean, as a fan of good football. Let's pretend for a moment that the match wasn't about Chile and Mexico. Would you be right now cheering the loser team? No, because they never had the attitud to attack. Pretty much the whole game they proposed a crappy tactic, which meant a bad show.
Regulus Tera said:I will agree that it is ugly football, but you cannot measure two teams of different levels with the same ruler. In the end you are in a competition where the point is to win. If you cannot win, you have to do the most to not lose -and that's what this Mexican team, patched up after third-party decisions and scandals, tried to do.
Regulus Tera said:And I don't wanna demerit Chile's victory (they totally deserved it), but what was shown tonight should be worrisome. Chance after chance wasted against a not-really-decent back four and a somewhat-decent goalie, putting my hyperbole throughout the match aside. There's just not that much finishing in your attack, and that will bite you in the arse against real competition.
Oveja Negra said:I'm a big fan of beautiful football above anything. That's why I miss Bielsa, El Loco always encouraged the team to attack the whole match. You can see now that's no the case anymore :/
lol no.K1LLER7 said:congrats chile fans
imo, mexico would have won this game with their gold cup team.Chile defence seemed weak when they were attacked towards the end there.Pacheco should have scored with his chance.
Well, Mexico kinda forced them by giving Copa America priority over Gold Cup, since Mexico is Concacaf's cash cow that had to stop. Still sucks, Copa America has always been a great tournament to play, not anymore.Error said:I think it's pretty shitty that concacaf gimped mexico because of gold cup.
iKeepPlaying said:lol no.
Try to score against 11 players glued to their own goal. That was the problem against Mexico. In the match against Uruguay, you'll see what happens when two top class teams try to score in each other goal, and not just defend and counterattack.
iKeepPlaying said:lol no.
Try to score against 11 players glued to their own goal. That was the problem against Mexico. In the match against Uruguay, you'll see what happens when two top class teams try to score in each other goal, and not just defend and counterattack.
I still think its ridicalous to put an under 23 rule, fuck i know that we can be competitive with a team made up solely of players from the local league.alterno69 said:Well, Mexico kinda forced them by giving Copa America priority over Gold Cup, since Mexico is Concacaf's cash cow that had to stop. Still sucks, Copa America has always been a great tournament to play, not anymore.
Noshino said:But....the team did attack.....like the whole match.....
I know, i'm just sad we can't play this with our senior team, or at least the priginal team before the hookers shit.mozfan12 said:I still think its ridicalous to put an under 23 rule, fuck i know that we can be competitive with a team made up solely of players from the local league.
Regulus Tera said:Dude, most of the chances wasted by Chile were not because of awesome defending or an incredible block. They were misses by your own players, hilarious misses at times. You cannot attribute your lack of accuracy on us.
iKeepPlaying said:Yeah, but Chile, against any other team, that doesn't play like if it's defending it's virginity, would had maybe 3 times more chances than now. And you translate that into 1 or 2 goals more, easily.
Granted, Chile sucks at scoring, I've been telling this since before the match, but when you have a team so defensive... every single chance wasted, looks somewhat bad.
Just watch the World Cup '10 match, Chile vs Switzerland
Chile attacked the whole fucking match. Suiza had their goal clean since like 2007. Chile could just score 1 goal. And you could say, yeah, Chile wasted their chances of scoring. But if the other team, wasn't so defensive... 3 goals would have been the minimum.
Regulus Tera said:And I don't wanna demerit Chile's victory (they totally deserved it), but what was shown tonight should be worrisome. Chance after chance wasted against a not-really-decent back four and a somewhat-decent goalie, putting my hyperbole throughout the match aside. There's just not that much finishing in your attack, and that will bite you in the arse against real competition.
Regulus Tera said:But then you assume that our Gold Cup team would give you opportunities to create the chances needed for you to score. Yes, we wouldn't play defensively, but that would also mean less possession for Chile, a tighter game at midfield, and having to deal with our Dos Santos/Chicharito/Guardado trifecta.
I hate having to work on assumptions on a match that may never happen, but you seem to be under the impression that all Mexican teams play catenaccio. Hell no.
iKeepPlaying said:lol no.
Try to score against 11 players glued to their own goal. That was the problem against Mexico. In the match against Uruguay, you'll see what happens when two top class teams try to score in each other goal, and not just defend and counterattack.