Cracked: 5 Reasons Wrestling Fans Are Giving Up On The WWE

Status
Not open for further replies.

wildfire

Banned
http://www.cracked.com/blog/5-reasons-wwe-dying-and-how-to-fix-it/

#5. The "Creative Department" Basically Doesn't Exist

When fans talk about how the Attitude Era was so much better (and they talk about it constantly), they often attribute its high ratings to the adult-oriented content. While I'm sure that cursing and titties did play a role in its popularity, what they forget to factor in (aside from the fact that the Monday Night War itself was a huge selling point) was that in that era, every major character had a storyline.

#4. There Is No Longer Any Suspense Or Surprise

It's Pavlovian; you feel good when the hero wins, so you keep coming back for that payoff. It's emotional heroin. It's a way to coax people into buying tickets, and it totally works. If you're going to see a title change hands, you're going to see it there, so you might as well buy a ticket and see it firsthand, right? Actually, it's not quite that simple.


#3. There's Something Modern Wrestlers Don't Understand About Their Roles


One of the most valuable assets in all of wrestling, regardless of the company, is a good heel. Someone the fans genuinely hate. It's a lot harder than it sounds, because a lot of guys who try end up sounding like an actor who's playing the role of a villain, instead of a man with genuine disdain for the audience. The person who can do that is vital because when he finally gets the shit kicked out of him by the hero, the audience feels retribution. His defeat is their reward for tuning in week after week. He is an emotional catalyst.

But there's a second part to that role. Given enough time, most heels will inevitably develop a following. Or another wrestler will need to take over that spot in order to prevent the show from becoming a bucket of dead squid. At that point, the villain needs to flip and turn into the hero. Very few people are able to do that.

#2. The Divas' Division Is An Afterthought

Even when you look past their acting ability, the actual wrestling isn't much better. There are a couple of decent performers, but for the most part, it's like watching them handle broken glass. The punches and kicks are badly mistimed. Most of the holds are as basic as it gets. I have a very hard time watching the matches because all of their moves telegraph the idea of "We are models first and foremost -- and sometimes we have to wrestle." It's just painfully awkward.

Here's a match from 2014:



And here's one from 2001:



Notice the difference in how the moves are executed? Notice how the punches look and sound real in the second one, but not the first? A whole lot of us do. So how do you fix it?

#1. The Man Running The Company No Longer Understands His Audience

I've listened to hundreds of hours of "shoot" interviews (where someone from the industry drops their character and just speaks honestly), and every single one of the stars from that era have one thing in common: They finally hit a breaking point where they threw up their hands and said, "Fuck this. I'm doing whatever I want. I don't care if I get fired."

But even further than that, several performers, including HHH, have said in multiple interviews that Vince himself hit a breaking point and just gave the green light for wrestlers to be themselves and do what they wanted.

I suggest you read more than the snippets I provided but I feel this article brings up enough talking points worth considering. How do you feel about the downward direction of the WWE?
 
I started watching around WM31 and before that, a couple of RAW episodes and liked Seth Rollins a lot.

After that, I barely know what's happening in there, aside from some dudes faking strikes and well, wrestling.

But "storylines", "character arcs"? What? I just see those guys beating the crap of each other, you mean there was a background to this before?

Think I started watching WWE way, way too late.
 
would wrestling be better if it was an actual sport and the outcomes werent fixed? or would it be better if there was a "choose your own adventure" type deal where the audience votes who wins and loses? i honestly do not understand the appeal of the wwe and would like to understand it. it seems pointless?
 
Vince sucks
Steph sucks
HHH sucks
Reigns sucks
Everyone who isn't Reigns or Cena are midcard geeks
WWE sucks...








Wrestle Kingdom 10 January 4th live from the Tokyo Dome!
 
would wrestling be better if it was an actual sport and the outcomes werent fixed? or would it be better if there was a "choose your own adventure" type deal where the audience votes who wins and loses? i honestly do not understand the appeal of the wwe and would like to understand it. it seems pointless?

Considering how boring most ufc fights are no thanks.

Choose your own adventure would be fun for a fed to try.
 
I'd say the debut of Kevin Owens followed by beating John Cena cleanly in his debut was the start of an interesting storyline, but it requires a lot of context and even then it stopped being must-see a month after it started.

For #2, I really wish he would have focused on how NXT, their development division, is having Match of the Year candidates with women wrestlers while they somehow pump out absolute trash for their main roster Divas. It's not even a competitor, it's the same freaking company.
 
Also is the author inferring the divas division hasn't always been an afterthougt? Even Trish would always be performing to crickets. I like how he picked 1 random match from 2014 vs 2001 and that's somehow shows the difference, as of they were not still freaking bra and panties matches going on then.
 
would wrestling be better if it was an actual sport and the outcomes werent fixed? or would it be better if there was a "choose your own adventure" type deal where the audience votes who wins and loses? i honestly do not understand the appeal of the wwe and would like to understand it. it seems pointless?
Pretty much all stories involve two opposing forces having a conflict. Wrestling's just very direct.
 
I started watching around WM31 and before that, a couple of RAW episodes and liked Seth Rollins a lot.

After that, I barely know what's happening in there, aside from some dudes faking strikes and well, wrestling.

But "storylines", "character arcs"? What? I just see those guys beating the crap of each other, you mean there was a background to this before?

Think I started watching WWE way, way too late.
If you watch WWE archives from roughly the debut of Smackdown to Unforgiven '00 you'll see the peak - when people said "male soap opera" - it was an accurate description.
 
That's pretty much accurate although no matter what I can never give up completely on WWE. Sometimes I will go months without watching (excluding PPVs usually) but I always come back. That being said, those reasons are spot on.
 
Also is the author inferring the divas division hasn't always been an afterthougt? Even Trish would always be performing to crickets. I like how he picked 1 random match from 2014 vs 2001 and that's somehow shows the difference, as of they were not still freaking bra and panties matches going on then.
I agree with most of the list, but yes the divas have rarely outputted solid matches. The good wrestlers too often had to carry the weaker ones.
 
This is why people have a hard time accepting guys like The Big Show, Roman Reigns, and John Cena as babyfaces. When they're playing heels (or at least thugs), all three of those guys can pull off "scary ass-kicker." We know that when they enter the ring, someone's getting skull-fucked.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. WTF is he talking about?
 
NXT fixes a lot of issues, but its only 60 minutes a week, and parts of NXT wont translate up and/or aren't going to address specific issues with the main roster.

What he is getting at is comments about the Divas being models first wrestlers second, or how they need to go back and train how to be good wrestlers.

NXT proves that Divas like Emma, Charlotte, Sasha Banks, and Becky Lynch can have Match of the Years if given the chance and aren't held back.
 
Forget the Attitude era. Bring back Punk and Bryan and Ill watch. Never happen though since Bryan is perma injured and Punk burned the bridge.
 
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. WTF is he talking about?
The parts about how things used to feel realer: everyone sees their childhood like that. The videos he showed from the past were just as bad as the ones from today.
 
But wasn't it Punk who left?
Punk took a sabbatical because they tried to kill him by making him work with a staph infection.
This escalated into a battle of wills until Punk was essentially fed up and then the WWE poured gasoline on the bridge to ensure he would never work for them again by firing him on his wedding day.
 
Also is the author inferring the divas division hasn't always been an afterthougt? Even Trish would always be performing to crickets. I like how he picked 1 random match from 2014 vs 2001 and that's somehow shows the difference, as of they were not still freaking bra and panties matches going on then.


This is going to sound sexist as fuck so I apologize beforehand.

At least back then if they didn't have a decent womans match, it was bras and panties match so it was still entertaining. Now we have 9 1 minute divas(we can't wrestle) matches and 1 woman's match.
 
Punk took a sabbatical because they tried to kill him by making him work with a staph infection.
This escalated into a battle of wills until Punk was essentially fed up and then the WWE poured gasoline on the bridge to ensure he would never work for them again by firing him on his wedding day.

Vince still owes him 3 favors.
 
Punk took a sabbatical because they tried to kill him by making him work with a staph infection.
This escalated into a battle of wills until Punk was essentially fed up and then the WWE poured gasoline on the bridge to ensure he would never work for them again by firing him on his wedding day.
Then WWE released a video of zoom-ins on Punk's ass.
 
Kevin Owens is a prime example of current WWE booking. Dude tore it up in NXT. Wrote a storyline of him doing whatever it takes to win, he's got a family to support. Except is all a sham, Owens is a dick....because he's a dick. He turned his back on his friend, won the NXT title, and injured Zayn in the process.

WWE panics and sends him up north, still champ. He even beats Super Cena in his debut. Awesome build up, and you have the NXT champ on your main roster. Perfect opportunity to bring eyes to NXT.

But us fans knew WWE would do like everyone else. Feed them to the Cena machine, and the wrestler is never the same again.
 
I agree with most of the list, but yes the divas have rarely outputted solid matches. The good wrestlers too often had to carry the weaker ones.
It was like that in the WWE's best years for womens wrestling too (2001-2003). Trish and Lita weren't great technicians or anything, but were marginal. They had spots, did them, and got the crowd into it. The heels (and less 'attractive' ladies) were often the ones who had more of a wrestling background and knew the ins and outs, the Victoria, Jazz, Molly, Ivory. The thing that got over with them was the stories involved. It wasn't always pretty, sex was and always will be a major sell for the casual audience for them in this company, good or bad, however it may be. Chyna was mega popular due to her storylines with the boys and getting so much comeuppance on them in various angles. The stuff with Jeff Jarrett is probably complained about today due to the male on female violence, but it was over, especially when Chyna got her revenge.
 
Not a strong article. Cheese's assessments of the women on the main roster are way off; besides the NXT women, who are extremely skilled for the most part, even the models are better. Nikki Bella is a genuinely good wrestler at this point and carried Charlotte to two very good matches. Even people like Alicia Fox are solid in limited work/if booked right. Key words: "if booked right."

He's also wrong about the title not being enough of a draw. Watch 1985 JCP - the titles are the huge draw more than anything, and people bought in. Make your titles important, and you can book any feud into automatic initial heat around it.
 
I think many of them are just now getting access to the internet and figuring out it's fake, personally.
 
Kevin Owens is a prime example of current WWE booking. Dude tore it up in NXT. Wrote a storyline of him doing whatever it takes to win, he's got a family to support. Except is all a sham, Owens is a dick....because he's a dick. He turned his back on his friend, won the NXT title, and injured Zayn in the process.

WWE panics and sends him up north, still champ. He even beats Super Cena in his debut. Awesome build up, and you have the NXT champ on your main roster. Perfect opportunity to bring eyes to NXT.

But us fans knew WWE would do like everyone else. Feed them to the Cena machine, and the wrestler is never the same again.
It's the same issue everyone has- they don't have storylines, period. It's just a bunch of random dorks, Cena, and New Day (who managed to force people to notice them.)
 
As someone who loved reading cracked back in the 2008 era. These days the only enjoyment i get from their articles is read the sub-title of each point without actually reading the article. If I attempt to read the article I just switch off.
 
I stopped watching it when it was all Randy Orton and John Cena every week. If it can get back to the WWF/WCW days let me know.
 
just add DBZ effects and the ratings will skyrocket

17djyaF.gif
 
Botchamania and podcasts fill my wrestling void, much better to watch the stupidity in highlights and laugh at people tear WWE apart than actually watch the show. And the good thing is it does keep me up to date with what's happening, so if things do improve, I can quickly hop back in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom