Crysis 2: PS3 performs better than 360 version
- Thread starter Firewire
- Start date
Unregistered007
Banned
I have a feeling that they might pull a ghost busters... LOL
it is a pity i gone back to pc hardware, makes ps3 look too low res, i got try out BF:BC2 and cant stand its jaggies and low fps.
Always-honest
Banned
nah, i guess in the end, there is just a tad more possible on the pS3 if you really want to and if you know what you're doing (exclusives kinda show this).edornob said:
but i doubt the two console versions will differ much.
-Yeti said:Oh yeah? Well...... the 360 conrtoller is better!
Just kidding. I really don't care about this because performance will only be slightly better. I'm not gonna go out and buy a PS3 just to buy the slightly better Crysis 2.
But how could you play the slightly inferior version of Crysis 2 knowing people with the other console are playing the same game with slightly better looking rocks?
palpabl_purpura
Member
I'm a PS3 owner, but if this thread wasn't designed for trolling, I don't know what is.
sweetvar26
Member
shinnn said:
:lol
theignoramus
Member
The game is still in development. What if the 360 version looks better while the PS3 versions performs better? this is what system warz oneupmanship has come to? Propaganda from a PS magazine?
Well you've always been told the PS3 is to hard to develop for but what if the tech is now harder to get that performance out of the 360. PS3 tech when you look at it from the bottom up has the edge in some key areas. I hope they actually pack on extra textures needed with the storage size afforded to them.Firewire said:
That would be the end of days. You see how the Final Fantasy thread turned out.The Faceless Master said:
Another one with the ghost busters crap. You really are dishonoring the Crytek people with your post. These aren't some no name devs so deal with it.Rat Salad said:
Nizz
Member
I think it's already started to an extent with EA. They seem to be leading a lot on PS3 these days. If not leading, then they damn sure make both versions pretty much identical. I'm just glad that games these days are closer in parity than ever before.StuBurns said:
I only own a PS3 so when I hear news like this about Crytek, I welcome it. It was a rough time back in 2007 when most ports were pretty bad. Not much of an issue nowadays (except for occasional stuff like Bayonetta).
Just like how this "Crysis 2 PS3 Will Hit Graphical Ceiling" thread op also omitted that the interview is from a playstation mag..:lolshinnn said:
Anyway, it's possible ps3 crysis 2 might perform better but then it'll probably look worse than the 360 version. But as I noted in that graphical ceiling thread, crytek is trying to sell their engine. Don't take these articles too seriously until we see the final product.
Haha Dabanton is this thread:Dabanton said:
I <3 Memes
Member
I know it's a new engine and all, but I'm still surprised to hear that Cryengine 3 would perform better on the PS3 then the 360 due to the 360's superior GPU. With as GPU bound as Cryengine 2 was I would have expected the same from Cryengine 3.
This presentation mentions how final LPV rendering stage is much faster on PlayStation 3 because crytek used half-resolution rendering mode with MSAA remapping trick.StuBurns said:
Anyway, I was just merely speculating. We won't know for sure until the game comes out.
Ploid 3.0 said:
I read some interviews with the story writer for Crysis 2, where he called the Halo-series' story "Bullshit" more or less, and he found Modern Warfare 2's story incredibly dissapointing. He did shove massive praise over Uncharted 2's story though, due to it being very tounge-in-cheek but still Hollywood-style.
Yerli, on the other hand, didn't fully like Uncharted 2's style, and compared the narrative of Crysis 2 with Avatar. "Fast paced and intense, but more about the world."
There was also more interviews with Yerli where he talked more about it.
That's all I could find right now.
Cornbread78
Member
Second said:And Nintendo shot for the whole Universe.
Not in developement terms....
They shot for Earth, and by gollie, they had a direct hit..... go figure. Cheap and easy wins..
I <3 Memes
Member
RavenFox said:
Why would I care what major nelson says? Then again why would I care whether or not the PS3 or the 360 has better performance? If I cared about IQ and performance then I would be playing this game on the PC. It just so happens I do care about IQ and performance so I will be playing this on PC. :lol Heck I haven't owned a console in 6 years and I doubt I will ever buy one again.
All I said was that Cryengine 2 is much more GPU bound then CPU bound and that I'm surprised that Cryengine 3 wouldnt be the same and thus perform better on the xbox 360. Because like it or not the xbox 360 has a better GPU.
RavenFox said:
Is that why to this very day Sony has never released the specs to their gpu within the PS3? They boasted with quite a swagger about their PS3 console yet are very quiet when it comes to gpu to 360 comparisons,no? I mean its pretty telling when they had to go to Nvidia at the last hour for a gpu while the xenon was built from the ground up as a powerhouse. I mean come on,you can't make this stuff up,facts are facts here.
You trying to boldly pass off PS3 as some sort of graphics king is laughable. Both machines are identical its just that they process things abit differently, plus Sony only chooses longer development times for game development while Microsoft choose to get the games out in a more timely fashion. Look at the run time for GT5 nowdays,five years? Come on.
If nowdays you have 3rd parties devoting more time to the PS3 as their lead platform,and having the games look virtually similar superior then that's not really saying much,its more fail than anything when you think about PS3 hardware.