I think most people (or at least, the people who don't adore it) wanted to hear Daft Punk reimagining the style of music from the 70s and early 80s... what we got was Daft Punk recreating music in the style from the 70s and early 80s.If you want old Daft Punk, then listen to old Daft Punk - it's not like it's gone or something
This album has a lot to do with our childhood and the memories of the state we were in at that stage of our lives. It's about our personal relationship to that time. It's less of a tribute to the music from 1975 to 1985 as an era, and more about focusing on the time when we were zero to ten years old. When you're a child you don't judge or analyze music. You just like it because you like it. You're not concerned with whether it's cool or not. Sometimes you might relate to just one thing in a song, such as the guitar sound. This album takes a playful, fun, and colorful look at music. It's about the idea of looking at something with an open mind and not asking too many questions. It's about the true, simple, and honest relationship you have with music when you're open to your own feelings.
-Thomas Bangalter
And no instruments. I want something Bobby McFerrin-esque, damnit.DP should follow this up with an album with no session musicians and no collaborators, singing every song and playing every instrument. And they should produce the whole thing in under a year.
I wish the album was more like Contact.
Damn shame.
I wish the album was more like Contact.
Damn shame.
Contact works great as an album ender, but I don't think it really can stand on its own.
Touch is the true masterpiece of the album. It is known.
I think most people (or at least, the people who don't adore it) wanted to hear Daft Punk reimagining the style of music from the 70s and early 80s... what we got was Daft Punk recreating music in the style from the 70s and early 80s.
Maybe it depends on what one's musical listening history is like. I've heard more stuff from the 70s and 80s than I'd care to mention, and I'd rather hear the stuff from then that DP are inspired by (or ripping off, depending on how you feel) than what they're actually playing. If it was their take on that stuff, then I'd be more open to it. But there's nothing new that hasn't been done.
What I loved about Discovery, was this:
What Daft Punk have done isn't like that but with live instruments and reimagining the music from the period they're inspired by... they're recreating it. Not capturing the essence of it and making it their own, just trying to remake it.
All must bend the knee to Paul Williams.
I'm looking forward to them remixing this stufff. It HAS to be mental, right?
Let's all be honest, if you were expecting something as good as Discovery or Alive, then this album is just plain boring.
If you were expecting an album filled with mediocre disco tracks then this is the album for you.
The fact that everyone is citing different tracks as their favorites is a testament to how great the album is.
The fact that everyone is citing different tracks as their favorites is a testament to how great the album is.
The fact that everyone is citing different tracks as their favorites is a testament to how great the album is.
Pretty much. I think I might be the first person to say Lose Yourself to Dance is my personal favorite.
I agree.The fact that everyone is citing different tracks as their favorites is a testament to how great the album is.
Too bad some people can't look beyond their misguided preconceptions and are unable to enjoy RAM.
Let's all be honest, it's stupid to project your opinion unto everyone.
I think I might be the first person to say Lose Yourself to Dance is my personal favorite.
I love the chopped up bluegrass.Fragments of Time is my favorite, so smooth.
Yeah you are right. But honestly I am not enjoying RAM at all. I like funky music, I like Daft Punk and I love electronic music. I also really enjoy music from the 70's and 80's.
I cannot enjoy this very much. There are a few good tracks but it feels like something they just threw together and indeed, just basically doing the exact same thing as the artists they were inspired by.
I didn't hear anything that really stands out, or a good club song or whatever. Something new.. I didn't hear it.
To me it's really boring, and very unexpected from Daft Punk imo. I was at least expecting 1 song worthy of a club hit or something.
And I want to state that I didn't get caught in the hype train or anything, I'm just legit disappointed.
...but I don't like the majority of the songs. How does that make this album great? Because it has a wide appeal?
Nah, it's my fave track so far as well. I love the combo of Instant Crush, Lose Yourself to Dance, Touch, then Get Lucky. So good.
Similar tastes.
I love the chopped up bluegrass.
First of all they said they were tired of their old approach. They didn't want the sample heavy robotic stuff they were doing before. They wanted more melodic work with actual live instruments. Check out their rolling stone interview. Second of all, lose yourself to dance will probably be a big hit.
I understand your disappointment. I guess i was happy with the departure from the older stuff. I always like the more slow and mellow stuff from them.
I'm looking forward to them remixing this stufff. It HAS to be mental, right?
Yeah you were destined to be dissapointed. Check this out:Sure, I did too, but more as an intermission between other great more electric songs. A song like Voyager is perfect like that. But imo the only song that even comes close to a good Daft Punk song is Doin it Right and Fragments.
I haven't been following the lead up to this album at all, keeping in the dark and only listening to Get Lucky. I liked that song but I was expecting something more than just an extension of that.
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/n...l-secrets-of-new-album-20130413#ixzz2TH2B74iy"After three records, there was a sense of searching for a record we hadn’t done," Thomas says. The duo were dissatisfied with early demos that leaned heavily on electronic equipment, feeling like they were operating on "autopilot," Thomas says. Eventually, a new approach emerged: "We wanted to do what we used to do with machines and samplers," he explains, "but with people." Except for a snippet of "an Australian rock record" that opens the final track, "Contact," Daft Punk foreswore samples entirely, and they limited the role of drum machines to just two of the album’s thirteen tracks. The only electronics come in the form of a massive, custom-built modular synthesizer that Daft Punk played live on the album, they told me, and an arsenal of vintage vocoders on which they manually manipulated factors like pitch, vibrato and legato. "There’s this thing today where the recorded human voice is processed to try to feel robotic," Thomas says, referring to the undying AutoTune vogue. "Here, we were trying to make robotic voices sound the most human they’ve ever sounded, in terms of expressivity and emotion."
The fact that they said they're remixing this themselves makes me think this is only Phase 1 of the project: recreate the production of the 70s. Phase 2 might be: turn that production into something new.
But in retrospect releasing that particular edit of Get Lucky as the taster may have done this album a great service for a lot of listeners. Get Lucky caused most everyone to wonder what the hell was happening. Even if you liked it, it sort of reset expectations.
Some may have told themselves the entire rest of the album would somehow be "real DP", but the general reactions are surprisingly positive for such an experiment.
Summed up my feelings.PSY・S;57643588 said:I wanted more future I was expecting DP to take the sound of the 70's and 80's and make something futuristic or transcendental with it, but it mostly sounds like an emulation of the old with a slight DP touch to it.
Yeah you were destined to be dissapointed. Check this out:
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/n...l-secrets-of-new-album-20130413#ixzz2TH2B74iy
ah after listening the new album, this feels good. It's like getting in a hot shower while you were freezing outside. Seriously, the new album is musically very interesting and original, but daft punk did not put any real energy, or any good beat, and thats what I like. It is too retro, too calm and even too sad I think. Too bad.
Ok listened to it about 10 times now and here is my review
You missed Lose yourself to dance?
Comparing this to their older albums is a futile endeavor. It is an extreme and intentional departure from their old work. By their own accounts they were tired of that style. They wanted a change for a single album(or longer).
The albums don't even really fit into the same genre.
You can like the other ones better but I think a lot of the people who don't like this album expected homeworkdiscovery part 2.0 or something. That is a valid viewpoint though.
Same thing happened with 808s and heartbreaks. An album I also loved.