I still think she's Han/Leia daughter. It's the only way this story has some weight. Fighting your evil cousin doesn't have as much weight as fighting your evil, irredeemable brother.
sorry to bump this thread but adding more to luke being reys dad, when ren is trying to go into her mind he mentions how she has thoughts of a single island etc which is obviously pointing out about lukes location aswell ? thus the connection between them two with the force is there just like luke secretly had between him and leia which is brought up in rotj when leia says she felt it too when he reveals about her being his sister
While I agree that she's more likely to not be Luke's, it's foolish to completely rule it out. When Yoda and Luke revealed the info about Leia in ROTJ it was nothing like the defining father moment from ESB. I think people have this idea that if she's Luke's daughter there has to be anon ESB esk franchise redefining revelation. It can be done much more subtly and still feel fresh (through visual storytelling for example) without attempting to reinvent the wheel.She's related to a Kenobi, or she's related to nobody.
Either way, the answer doesn't really matter outside of providing some context to why the Force is so strong in her. It's not going to be some sort of key piece of info that reshapes the entirety of the saga to this point.
Not everything is going to be "I am your father," and honestly, Star Wars, outside of that one twist, executed perfectly, has never been about those sorts of twists, anyway. Constantly looking for one, or trying to shoehorn one into the story, tends to be a big part of people's frustrations when their speculations hit the brick wall of the finished film.
Isn't the bad guy a Skywalker anyway? Why add another?
While I agree that she's more likely to not be Luke's, it's foolish to completely rule it out. .
Why would Ridley think it was revealed in the movie if she was a Kenobi? How would that have been obvious?
Why would Ridley think it was revealed in the movie if she was a Kenobi? How would that have been obvious?
Hearing Obi-Wan's voice during her force-induced flashback from touching the lightsaber.
The vision literally speaks to her, twice. Everything else is memories and moments that the saber was around for. But Ben Kenobi reaches through the vision to speak directly to her, and then shortly thereafter, Maz Kanata disqualifies Luke as being a part of her family.
If she'd known via discussions with JJ Abrams that Ben was her grampa or great-uncle or whatever, seeing that in the film would probably cause her to go "Well, shit, that pretty much leads people directly to it, doesn't it."
This forum was one of the first places where a really solid argument for her being a relative of Ben Kenobi got built, in fact. It's lost in one of the three different Force Awakens threads, though.
What does Maz say that disqualifies her from being Luke's? I can't find the full scene anywhere, and the most pertinent things that I can find are her saying "It was Luke's saber, and his father's before him, and now it calls to you" and "The belonging you are seeking doesn't lie behind you, but ahead", which makes a much easier A to B with Luke considering where the movie ends.The vision literally speaks to her, twice. Everything else is memories and moments that the saber was around for. But Ben Kenobi reaches through the vision to speak directly to her, and then shortly thereafter, Maz Kanata disqualifies Luke as being a part of her family.
What does Maz say that disqualifies her from being Luke's?
"Dear child. I see your eyes. You already know the truth. Whomever you're waiting for on Jakku... they're never coming back... But... there's someone who still could.
Rey: Luke."
Luke can't be her dad becaues Maz just said that the family she's waiting for on Jakku isn't coming back - and then SPECIFICALLY says Luke still could. Thus delineating between "your family" and "Luke Skywalker"
Luke Skywalker can't be her family because if he was that sentence would make zero sense.
What does Maz say that disqualifies her from being Luke's? I can't find the full scene anywhere, and the most pertinent things that I can find are her saying "It was Luke's saber, and his father's before him, and now it calls to you" and "The belonging you are seeking doesn't lie behind you, but ahead", which makes a much easier A to B with Luke considering where the movie ends.
Ah, gotcha, thanks."Dear child. I see your eyes. You already know the truth. Whomever you're waiting for on Jakku... they're never coming back... But... there's someone who still could.
Rey: Luke."
Luke can't be her dad becaues Maz just said that the family she's waiting for on Jakku isn't coming back - and then SPECIFICALLY says Luke still could. Thus delineating between "your family" and "Luke Skywalker"
Luke Skywalker can't be her family because if he was that sentence would make zero sense.
Maybe, but her family is "strong" in the force, it wouldnt make any sense to have her be a Kenobi or any other family. Shes a Skywalker. SW (movies) is about that family.
It makes complete sense that Luke wouldnt mention it to anyone and try to "hide" her. He wants to avoid the drama that happened before and at the same time, try to protect her from being lured by the dark side. Everything fits.
I've stayed out of this mess cause it's absurd that it's spawned so many pages, but seeing as it's bumped I might as well dip in. I think people have way over read into what Ridley said. She thought some stuff was answered in the movie. One, that doesn't mean it was answered. Two, that doesn't mean her assumption is even correct. Three, that assumption could be as mundane as they are random nobodies who left her on Jakku, which is the obvious thing the movie tells you. Four, why you all do this for 16 pages?
And if it turns out she's related to Ben Kenobi through his straying from Jedi Dogma at some point between Episodes II and IV, and we only just now found out about it in the sequel trilogy, that's not really a twist. That's more of a reveal. It doesn't change much of anything about how we view the series, or the fundamental nature of the story. Not in the way "I am your father" did. It just explains why she's so strong in the Force.
Thematically, it would probably provide a little more resonance in that it turns the Kenobi/Skywalker dynamic into something a little more interesting. Ben didn't want to train Anakin. Trained him like an asshole. Anakin turns, Ben basically forces him into the iron lung. Ben keeps Luke safe, and then sets him on the right path, but in the wrong way. Luke rejects Ben's teachings and saves the galaxy in his own way. Now Ben's grandkid has to wake Luke up so Anakin's son can set her on the path she needs to take to take out Anakin's grandkid, who is somehow more of an asshole than Anakin was.
What if the Skywalker story ends with a Kenobi taking on the Skywalker name after ending their bloodline for the good of the Galaxy?
It is, but I took it as the Force simply guiding her to where she needed to be. The student needs a master....when ren is trying to go into her mind he mentions how she has thoughts of a single island etc which is obviously pointing out about lukes location aswell ?
"Your father... was seduced by the Dark Side of the Force. He ceased to be the Jedi Anakin Skywalker and "became" Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So, what I told you was true... from a certain point of view.""Dear child. I see your eyes. You already know the truth. Whomever you're waiting for on Jakku... they're never coming back... But... there's someone who still could.
Rey: Luke."
Luke can't be her dad becaues Maz just said that the family she's waiting for on Jakku isn't coming back - and then SPECIFICALLY says Luke still could. Thus delineating between "your family" and "Luke Skywalker"
Luke Skywalker can't be her family because if he was that sentence would make zero sense.
Looking forward to Kenobi getting some action in his own movie eventually.
"Your father... was seduced by the Dark Side of the Force. He ceased to be the Jedi Anakin Skywalker and "became" Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So, what I told you was true... from a certain point of view."
Just saying there's an out.
The real thing for me is that The Force Awakens leaves everything and nothing on the table re Rey's parents, so I guess it makes sense why people get so feverish about it. But that movie didn't tell us. And Ridley didn't tell us in some vaguely out of context and over reported about quote some months later. No one is pointing to anything as a gotcha yet even if they think they are. I just think the best course is chilling out and not ruining things for yourself by trying to assume the unknown and setting yourself up for disappointment in the process.And this is just as valid, and just as likely, honestly. The only real utility I could see in her being related to a character we already know is almost solely as a means to explain her force sensitivity. Beyond that, it doesn't really matter. It's certainly not what's made her the person she is, and that experience is what's going to drive her forward. Not whatever she learns about whoever her parents are. If they're nobodies, that's fine. If they're characters we've never heard of before but are still somehow tied to some aspect of the force unintroduced until now, that's just as good.
I just think the best course is chilling out and not ruining things for yourself by trying to assume the unknown and setting yourself up for disappointment in the process.
Looking forward to Kenobi getting some action in his own movie eventually.
And one step further: I'd suggest not hitching your enjoyment or disappointment to whether or not the film proves your personal speculation correct.
"Told you!" isn't a reward worth ruining an otherwise fulfilling movie over.
It's Luke. He's, like, crying on that mountaintop when he sees her.
"I think the amazing thing about [The Force Awakens] is that Finn and Rey don’t come from anywhere, and they find a place. So to me, it’s funny that people think it’s so important because I don’t really think it is."
Also, (kind of a big spoiler?)her parentage isn't being answered in 8, it's hinted at. Sorry lol. But the massacre and what happened to Ben as well as Luke's feelings on everything will be cleared up.
Having the mystery box there at all was a horrible idea, especially if you weren't going to deal with it in the first movie. There are two options, they knew what was in the box when the script was written, which considering JJ Abram's track record isn't a sure thing. Or they kicked the can down the road for the next guy.
Also, (kind of a big spoiler?)her parentage isn't being answered in 8, it's hinted at. Sorry lol. But the massacre and what happened to Ben as well as Luke's feelings on everything will be cleared up.
For reasons that are un fn known, it seems Disney doesn't want to go that route. It makes all the sense in the world, instead we are getting Bobba Fett? Bobba Fett?
This isn't really a "mystery box" thing. That term has been misused pretty consistently (I've done it myself) since Abrams introduced it at that TED talk.
And it's a sure thing they knew who her parents were when they wrote the screenplay, they've said as much. Abrams, Kasdan, Johnson, and Ridley all know her parentage, and knew it before the movie started filming.
This seems suspect as hell. Almost nothing from that film even remotely worth a shit has been leaked, but somehow that detail is out over a year before release? I dunno.
Spoiler-game ain't what it once was, definitely.
Lucasfilm. And the reasons aren't unknown - someone recently clarified that they're not eager to go the Ben Kenobi spinoff route yet because apparently there's something to do with him in the Sequel Trilogy that they want dealt with first. Something along those lines.
And it's a sure thing they knew who her parents were when they wrote the screenplay, they've said as much. Abrams, Kasdan, Johnson, and Ridley all know her parentage, and knew it before the movie started filming.
For reasons that are un fn known, it seems Disney doesn't want to go that route. It makes all the sense in the world, instead we are getting Bobba Fett? Bobba Fett?
While I definitely agree with you, unless they filmed it with only a few people on set and do it in ADR, it ain't happening. I think the interviews will be telling as they will try and dehype it the way Mark Hamill did months before TFW so people weren't disappointed.
And at one point early on, Lucas said he had the entire saga planned out
Why not both?I still think she's Han/Leia daughter. It's the only way this story has some weight. Fighting your evil cousin doesn't have as much weight as fighting your evil, irredeemable brother.
I'm confused - where are you getting this info from? Like, were you on set or something? I'm not trying to like, cross-examine you or anything, I'm just honestly confused as to how you're solid on what was or wasn't shot on the set. Is this a report you read from Making Star Wars? A reddit leak? Do you know a guy who knows a guy?
How George Lucas did shit isn't the best example to use now that he's sold the company to people who don't really operate the way he did, though.
My point is, more than one person has seen the rough cut right? It has to be processed, cleaned, released, temp effects etc. you know the deal. So people have already seen many elements of it. Are there people out there who weren't on set able to get the general plot of it this way, go from point A to C with footage being put together? Sure. Also, Making Star Wars doesn't let on as much as they know or they wouldn't have "hits" all year. Heck, they probably know more details than anyone, even some of the people working on it since they can get a piece from everyone and put it together like a puzzle (that's the assumption).
I'm just using it as an example about how people lie for PR. It's happened before, it will happen again. Many times writers and directors say they have everything planned out at the beginning, and years later it comes out that they did not. Look at Lost and Fringe for examples from Abrams of setting shit up that he didn't know the answer to.
So are you saying the spoiler you just dropped came from Making Star Wars? I'm just trying to figure out how you came across the info. Is it an assumption you're making, a thing you heard, or something you learned firsthand from someone involved. That's all.
I'm not trying to dig into the theory of how spoilers come to be, I'm familiar with all that ridiculousness, heh. I'm just straight up asking how you learned that particular piece of information. Is it a thing you know for certain, or is it speculation you just phrased as a certainty?
I don't think they're lying, they're just not saying. Besides which, one of the FIRST things Kennedy addressed when Abrams got hired was that the shit he pulled on Into Darkness (i.e. flat out lying) is not a thing that would be happening at Lucasfilm.
I mean, if you wanna go the route of "well maybe she's lying about not lying" then I mean, I can't really do anything about that, I guess.
Daisy Ridley Thought Rey’s Parentage Was Revealed in ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’
I thought a lot was answered in ‘The Force Awakens’. Then after the screening I went for a drink with my agent and everyone, and we were chatting away and I realized that oh, in their minds it’s not answered at all!