Those bullet points are terrible.
And they seem to support what critics are saying. I don't want bigger budget games to "fade away."
"Getting creative" via a sub service is code for you need to do something small and cheap because we can't afford a bigger game.
Netflix and Amazon Prime content typically is pretty bad. Netflix creates makes a bunch of bad documentaries, and very few quality shows. I mean "Stranger Things" was one of their big breakout hits, and there are like three seasons with ten episodes a season or so? And it's really slow going, AND the quality dropped off hard. Amazon Prime ... they couldn't even keep The Grand Tour going. I don't think they produce any TV shows or movies worth watching. It's all just filler garbage from what I see on the service.
Also the total audience for Netflix is waaaaay beyond anything GP will ever get (200 million subs) and TV content is cheaper to produce than a large game, barring big tv shows like Game of Thrones. But again, those are supported by very premium channels like HBO, not the Walmart of video that is Netflix. HBO could direct their funds in a more targeted manner, and it was probably the one show to be a cultural phenomenon until it tanked in the last season.
IMO video subs perfectly support the idea of what will happen to games if everything starts going that direction. Content will start being created as smaller, mass market, junk.
And your point is? Oscars have made extremely bad choices for quite some time. Also how many of those are technical?
Maybe I need to watch the video and am missing what the actual points were because I don't see how any of this makes sense.