Sibersk Esto
Banned
If BVS proved anything to me, it's that Snyder's idea of learning from his mistakes is to satisfy a checklist in order to justify the same mistakes as before.
I'm pretty sure Junkie XL has that/did her theme.
Is there a link to the Wonder Woman theme track? I wanna listen to it again. Best part of the soundtrack by a country mile.
Batman and Superman are proving a huge draw in their first meeting on the big screen, despite poor reviews and a B CinemaScore.
Zack Snyder's Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice — in a key win for Warner Bros. — is off to a superhero-sized start at the North American box office, where it grossed an estimated $82 million from 4,242 theaters on Good Friday Friday, on par with Jurassic World's Friday in summer in 2015 and one of the top Fridays of all time.
That puts the movie on course to gross as much as $172 million through Easter Sunday, the No. 4 opening of all time for a comic book adaptation and the No. 6 opening among any film. It's doing the best of any Batman film (The Dark Knight Rises debuted to $160.9 million) and, among superhero films, would only rank behind Marvel Studios: The Avengers ($207.4 million), Avengers: Age of Ultron ($191.3 million) and Iron-Man 3 ($174.1 million).
Could we stop doing personal insults on someone just because you dont like the content he produces.Snyder isn't going to learn anything. He's always been a hack and he's trending down. MoS and BvS are his career low points besides SP.
At this point he is who he is.
Is there a link to the Wonder Woman theme track? I wanna listen to it again. Best part of the soundtrack by a country mile.
Is she with you?
I loved that fight scene, but it was way too short. I loved seeing them do their combo attacks. I'm so fucking excited for JL. I don't care if padding it out another 2-3 minutes would add no plot value to the movie. Going to love when we get the full league going against Brainiac or Darkseid.
How is what I said in any way a personal insult?Could we stop doing personal insults on someone just because you dont like the content he produces.
"Snyder is a hack."How is what I said in any way a personal insult?
They should never have put the starting date of Justice League so shortly after BvS, they're stuck between a rock and a hard place now. They don't have enough time to change direction unless they push the movie, but they're going to look weak if they do that .
I think he's a hack because I think he's a bad filmmaker. That's a judgment on his work product. I don't know anything about him personally, he's prob really nice and chill."Snyder is a hack."
"Snyder is a hack."
It's funny, a lot of people hated it.
I liked it too, but it was too much on the nose in that one scene.
Looking like 172 million for the weekend. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/box-office-batman-v-superman-877979
That's not a personal insult. It's just a roundabout way of saying that the man continues to fail to deliver his promises, which is something almost everyone can agree with no matter how much they like his movies."Snyder is a hack."
You don't know what a hack director is. Stop throwing personal insults that you don't even understand.How is what I said in any way a personal insult?
They don't need to get rid of Snyder WB just needs to tighten the leash be more hands on if the editing is not working then bring in someone that makes it work ect ect, I'm really looking forward to JL now that the hard stuff is out of the way I hope Snyder can make it work
I kind of feel the same way - buuuut I think if they can simplify the script and really work on the editing, it can be okay. And I really don't like Zach.I don't know, I tend to believe that the movies that truly reflect a director's vision are the best ones. Snyder's vision is not working out but I dont think Warner trying to salvage Justice League in panic mode is going to result in a great movie either. They need a new director but they have no time... I just don't really see a scenario where Justice League is a great movie. I really hope I'm wrong though.
I think he's a hack because I think he's a bad filmmaker. That's a judgment on his work product. I don't know anything about him personally, he's prob really nice and chill.
Listen - I'm not trying to personally attack you or ruin what is a pretty great community thread. I'm going to hold off on posting my more honest but harsh criticisms here in the future, I totally get it. That said we have to agree to disagree here.A hack is not a bad director. A hack is somebody who doesn't even try shit, lacking any artistic aspirations & abilities.
Everything comes together cohesively, but only if you view it as an abstract, rather than trying to take things purely as they're presented.
Not a manner of opinion. You are wrong on that. Here are some examples of hack directors so you can educate yourself about it.Listen - I'm not trying to personally attack you or ruin what is a pretty great community thread. I'm going to hold off on posting my more honest but harsh criticisms here in the future, I totally get it. That said we have to agree to disagree here.
I mean, come on lol. It's very clearly something you can have an opinion on (my opinion not even being that controversial - or to rephrase that, it's not an uncommon thought).Not a manner of opinion. You are wrong on that. Here are some examples of hack directors so you can educate yourself about it.
http://www.ifc.com/2010/01/paycheck
I mean, they have enough eggs in the basket...
Worse case scenario
I'd move The Flash and Aquaman up and put Justice League in the latter 2018 slot.
Could then probably find room for a solo Batman film in 2019 and put JL 2 in 2020.
I mean, they have enough eggs in the basket...
Worse case scenario
I'd move The Flash and Aquaman up and put Justice League in the latter 2018 slot.
Could then probably find room for a solo Batman film in 2019 and put JL 2 in 2020.
Ok. Double down on being wrong. I respect the reality that facts don't change wrong opinions.I mean, come on lol. It's very clearly something you can have an opinion on (my opinion not even being that controversial - or to rephrase that, it's not an uncommon thought).
One of things I will defend to the death is like the first 20 minutes of the movie. That was some of the best stuff ever included in a comic book movie. That was easily Snyder's best work. Ever. I don't know what happened after that. Maybe by that point he was exhausted and just wasn't in it 100% but, yea, that first section of the movie was fucking phenomenal.
I don't really agree there. BvS is clearly 3 totally different ideas that don't even fit well together, being forced together into a singular film. It's not cohesive at all. The parts are far more interesting than the whole.
What are the different ideas, in your opinion? I thought the various arcs of the movie fed into eachother quite nicely.
I think Zack is a big idea man... they just need to find someone who can execute his vision properly.
I don't understand this perspective. Wouldn't you rather wait a while for then to have a competent vision of the character that's interesting and thoughtful instead of something rushed and stupid? Batman Forever and Batman & Robin came about when WB saw the money flowing from merely pushing the Batman brand with little thought or care, Batman Begins and TDK came after years of thought and debate regarding the best possible way to portray the character on the big screen.I don't want to wait 3 years for a Batman movie.
For me, Doomsday is the really big thing that just sticks out and doesn't work. I agree generally with the rest of your thoughts, better execution could have tied it up more neatlyAgreed. Spoilers, sorry submitted without tags:
Batman being cynical and turning on Clark more and more.
Superman wondering more and more his place in the world.
Both being manipulated by Lex in those regards as Lois works to uncover it.
This all comes to a head when Lois finds out and everything converges. Lex is the one that ties it all together.
What are the different ideas, in your opinion? I thought the various arcs of the movie fed into eachother quite nicely.
The majority of the movie is a variation of The Dark Knight Returns. Those elements work the best and feel the most organic. Then there is the desire to tie The Death of Superman into the climax as well, and that requires Doomsday. This part mostly feels tacked on and underdeveloped. The final component is all the JL tie ins. The only thing that works here is Wonder Woman, while the Knightmare stuff and the Metahumans videos are so disjointed and irrelevant to the film that they should never have been in it.
Man, I don't know if I'dclassify the JL teases as an element unto themselves like the Dark Knight Returns or Death of Superman stuff is. They take up all of 15 minutes of the movie. You're right that they're definitely not at all well integrated, but they're also comparatively minor.
I would consider the inclusion of WW and the Doomsday fight a Justice League tease. It felt so out of place given the themes of the rest of the movie and was clearly inserted to help kickstart their new franchise. Instead of further the little plot the movie tried establishing.
Man, I don't know if I'dclassify the JL teases as an element unto themselves like the Dark Knight Returns or Death of Superman stuff is. They take up all of 15 minutes of the movie. You're right that they're definitely not at all well integrated, but they're also comparatively minor.
As for the rest,the trick I think is that they're not doing the Dark Knight Returns or the Death of Superman in a vacuum, they're pulling in Death of Superman elements to sort of refute Dark Knight. Superman sacrifices himself to save humanity, showing that the fear that's consumed Batman is misplaced. Doomsday is used to kill Superman, partially because that's the story, partially because hey why not it's a big fight worthy of the Trinity. Honestly, they could have just had Luthor kill him directly with some big doomsday device rather than the actual Doomsday, but the net effect is basically the same.
I think he's a hack because I think he's a bad filmmaker. That's a judgment on his work product. I don't know anything about him personally, he's prob really nice and chill.
In that case I'm sorry, I always assumed being called a hack was more reflective of the person and not so much his ability. I have no problem with someone calling anyone else incompetent based on their work.But that's not a personal insult, it's an assessment of his competence. If we're talking about how well made a film is, if a person feels the film wasn't well made, it is fair to say the filmmaker is... incompetent.