I like ranking things too.
1. Wonder Woman
2. Man of Steel
3. Batman v Superman
4. Suicide Squad
Suicide Squad being the only one I don't like, that movie is really bad on a rewatch.
Same
I like ranking things too.
1. Wonder Woman
2. Man of Steel
3. Batman v Superman
4. Suicide Squad
Suicide Squad being the only one I don't like, that movie is really bad on a rewatch.
CLEARLY someone wasn't drinking properly because I've made it through literal hundreds of terrible movies with booze!
WW and Superman are two different to make this kind of statement.This is how I rank it. Gal Gadot is a better Superman than Henry Cavill.
The movie is a mess straight up.
WW and Superman are two different to make this kind of statement.
Uuuuuhhh.... sure.As they're portrayed in the DCEU, sure.
But she's definitely pretty much playing Supes role so far in this universe. Which I don't terribly mind, WW should enjoy the limelight for once.
I just wish it didn't come at the expense of a well-written Superman.
The movie is a mess straight up.
I haven't seen SS since I saw it in theaters. There's nothing about it that warrants a revisit for me except the pleasure of watching that bar scene and thinking about what the movie could have been.Some of you guys are weird. I do not like Suicide Squad at all but I can sit through it with no issue, lol.
I honestly think it's the perception of how the heroes enjoyed/were burdened with their actions. Superman did heroic things for sure, but he wasn't reveling in doing them (which I think was totally ok for the tone of that movie), while Diana was enjoying what she was doing as she was doing it, not just afterwards. When she busts though the window with the shield, she's smiling and almost laughing at how easy it's coming to her and that she knows she's changing something for the better.Yeah, I don't get the hate boner for some of these movies either. I'm guessing it's because I don't have that much history with these characters that I can accept different versions of them.
One of the things that's got me scratching my head about all the Wonder Woman praise is the 'heroic' label that's being attached to the movie. It's being thrown around as something the other movies lack and I'm pretty sure the other movies have dozens examples of heroism. I don't really get the difference between what's offered in WW as 'heroic' than what we saw in MoS and BvS.
Should Superman have been thrown a party when he saved the girl from the fire instead of being worshipped? Is it that simple?
I'm so glad I don't vehemently hate any movies like some of you guys seem to do. I don't hate Suicide Squad at all, but I do wish it had lived up to it's potential from that first trailer. It's my least favorite of the 4 DCEU movies for sure, but I can't flat out HATE a movie just for existing. I find there are some fun scenes in that movie and I like a few of the actors portrayals of the characters I've grown up with over 35 years. I have no problem with re-watching it if I see it on TV or someone suggests to pop it in to kill some time.
If I ranked in order it'd be pretty much like everyone else's list
BvS:UC - Mos/WW - SS
And honestly, MoS and WW are pretty much tied right now for 2nd favorite.
Uuuuuhhh.... sure.
I'm so glad I don't vehemently hate any movies like some of you guys seem to do. I don't hate Suicide Squad at all, but I do wish it had lived up to it's potential from that first trailer. It's my least favorite of the 4 DCEU movies for sure, but I can't flat out HATE a movie just for existing. I find there are some fun scenes in that movie and I like a few of the actors portrayals of the characters I've grown up with over 35 years. I have no problem with re-watching it if I see it on TV or someone suggests to pop it in to kill some time.
.
Yeah, I don't get the hate boner for some of these movies either. I'm guessing it's because I don't have that much history with these characters that I can accept different versions of them.
One of the things that's got me scratching my head about all the Wonder Woman praise is the 'heroic' label that's being attached to the movie. It's being thrown around as something the other movies lack and I'm pretty sure the other movies have dozens examples of heroism. I don't really get the difference between what's offered in WW as 'heroic' than what we saw in MoS and BvS.
Should Superman have been thrown a party when he saved the girl from the fire instead of being worshipped? Is it that simple?
If you say so.I don't necessarily agree with the comparison, but there's really nothing odd with his opinion.
Some folks can definitely go overboard and just go straight hyperbole and hate, unfortunately. Personally I don't 'hate' any of them, as I can rewatch them all. But you can not 'hate' a movie and still acknowledge it's very very flawed.
Probably the best way to approach it is to really break down the differences you saw in both characters in these movies. Their motivations, their mannerisms, their responses to adversity, their ideals and how they both approach acting on their ideals as well as respond to having those ideals challenged. I'd say there are similarities and differences and I would guess that some of those differences resonate better with a lot of people and what they feel 'superheroes' represent.
If you say so.
I think what Wingfan said is true for the most part in that it's all about tone. I can see how someone can like what Diana does more because she does it with a flair of enthusiam that you don't really see from Clark. I attribute that to the fact that Diana really loves to fight and that's her in her natural element. Clark to me is the guy who doesn't want combat since he's avoided it his entire life and he's growing into that role, so him not being totally comfortable in that situation is understandable. I still view everything he does as heroic because he still does all those things. He doesn't have to do anything but he chooses to anyway. That's selfless and the right thing to do which I ascribed to heroism.Probably the best way to approach it is to really break down the differences you saw in both characters in these movies. Their motivations, their mannerisms, their responses to adversity, their ideals and how they both approach acting on their ideals as well as respond to having those ideals challenged. I'd say there are similarities and differences and I would guess that some of those differences resonate better with a lot of people and what they feel 'superheroes' represent.
Yeah, I don't get the hate boner for some of these movies either. I'm guessing it's because I don't have that much history with these characters that I can accept different versions of them.
One of the things that's got me scratching my head about all the Wonder Woman praise is the 'heroic' label that's being attached to the movie. It's being thrown around as something the other movies lack and I'm pretty sure the other movies have dozens examples of heroism. I don't really get the difference between what's offered in WW as 'heroic' than what we saw in MoS and BvS.
Should Superman have been thrown a party when he saved the girl from the fire instead of being worshipped? Is it that simple?
It was never your problem, I just replied to your statement.*shrug* ok man. if you can't really actually back up your disagreement, it's not my problem.
I think what Wingfan said is true for the most part in that it's all about tone. I can see how someone can like what Diana does more because she does it with a flair of enthusiam that you don't really see from Clark. I attribute that to the fact that Diana really loves to fight and that's her in her natural element. Clark to me is the guy who doesn't want combat since he's avoided it his entire life and he's growing into that role, so him not being totally comfortable in that situation is understandable. I still view everything he does as heroic because he still does all those things. He doesn't have to do anything but he chooses to anyway. That's selfless and the right thing to do which I ascribed to heroism.
I'm not sure how much we're discussing spoilers, but I really like Diana's reaction when things don't go her way: when they gas the village and she realizes that she can't save everyone. She almost breaks down. That made her seem more real to me. That's how we act when life throws us a curveball and our beliefs break down.
I think I like my heroes brooding a little bit lol.
It was never your problem, I just replied to your statement.
I'm not being defensive nor meaning to come off that way. I'm just replying. I don't argue on this forum anymore.nothing wrong with that, and I can relate a lot of the time. I really don't think the combat thing is the full difference there, though, as it really doesn't apply to her general ideals about helping people and suffering, justice, etc. you're probably right about the enthusiasm angle in general though, I would think that goes a long way with people.
agree with you on the spoiler
the passive aggressive stuff would suggest otherwise. not really sure why you're so defensive/insulting over a reasonable opinion, but whatever.
I'm not being defensive nor meaning to come off that way. I'm just replying. I don't argue on this forum anymore.
That's a better way of what I was trying to say. Clark doesn't want to fight, it really his last resort. Diana is a trained and bred warrior by default.I think what Wingfan said is true for the most part in that it's all about tone. I can see how someone can like what Diana does more because she does it with a flair of enthusiam that you don't really see from Clark. I attribute that to the fact that Diana really loves to fight and that's her in her natural element. Clark to me is the guy who doesn't want combat since he's avoided it his entire life and he's growing into that role, so him not being totally comfortable in that situation is understandable. I still view everything he does as heroic because he still does all those things. He doesn't have to do anything but he chooses to anyway. That's selfless and the right thing to do which I ascribed to heroism.
I think I like my heroes brooding a little bit lol.
Bleepey, I know you always harp on that "smile while you kill" stuff, but that's not what we're saying. It's just, for better or worse, the only examples we have in these movies thus far to give us A to B comparisons. It's just the optics of how the DC heroes have been portrayed so far which isn't at the current general perceived notion of how these heroes act from the comics and the older media that has seeped into the pop culture. DC will get there from the looks of it. I believe Synder had a vision the whole time of his Superman arc. Instead of doing it all in one movie like Superman 78, he's taking a trilogy to get us to that super heroic truth justice and the American way Superman.Snyder that edgy edgelord should have learnt from St Donner and had Superman crack a smile each time he engaged in murder instead of feel distraught
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cY5RD3Ocmsg
Whatever you want to call it, I'm not doing it. Have at it if you want.Arguing=/=discussing
Whatever you want to call it, I'm not doing it. Have at it if you want.
Whatever you want to call it, I'm not doing it. Have at it if you want.
Yeah, I don't get the hate boner for some of these movies either. I'm guessing it's because I don't have that much history with these characters that I can accept different versions of them.
One of the things that's got me scratching my head about all the Wonder Woman praise is the 'heroic' label that's being attached to the movie. It's being thrown around as something the other movies lack and I'm pretty sure the other movies have dozens examples of heroism. I don't really get the difference between what's offered in WW as 'heroic' than what we saw in MoS and BvS.
Should Superman have been thrown a party when he saved the girl from the fire instead of being worshipped? Is it that simple?
Sorry but I agree with them. Comes off as passive aggressive and we don't really need that here, at all.
lol the whole "uhhh...if you say so" bit is, effectively, arguing. But whatever makes you feel better about how you spend your time on an Internet forum lmao
If Mummy flops, can WB steal Cruise for DC?
You are a mess.
If Mummy flops, can WB steal Cruise for DC?
This is how I rank it. Gal Gadot is a better Superman than Henry Cavill.
I still think if they're going for old Hal Jordan with young John Stewart and the whole buddy cop thing, Cruise would be a good pick since Patrick Wilson got snatched up for Aquaman.
BUT you could watch a good movie with booze instead!
We moved onto Raiders of The Lost Ark (she'd never seen it, wtf!) shortly after.
Uhhhh, it's true.Uuuuuhhh.... sure.
This is the same type of garbage that was parotted in the Civil War threads... you could make an argument that WW goes out of her way to save people that have nothing to do with the mission and is a better hero, but she's not a better Superman nor is she trying to be.
Last time I checked, Superman doesn't come with a deer in headlights naivety out of a different time that is inherit with the WW character.
It's a baseless and very face level criticism that falls apart under closer inspection. Saying something like this makes it sound like Jenkins/Gadot failed to make a WW movie and instead made a Superman movie in disguise, which is a disservice to how well they created/shaped Wonder Woman's character.
This is the same type of garbage that was parotted in the Civil War threads... you could make an argument that WW goes out of her way to save people that have nothing to do with the mission and is a better hero, but she's not a better Superman nor is she trying to be.
Last time I checked, Superman doesn't come with a deer in headlights naivety out of a different time that is inherit with the WW character.
It's a baseless and very face level criticism that falls apart under closer inspection. Saying something like this makes it sound like Jenkins/Gadot failed to make a WW movie and instead made a Superman movie in disguise, which is a disservice to how well they created/shaped Wonder Woman's character.
I think people make this comparison because I don't feel Snyder truly turned that corner with his Superman.
WW shares many ideals with Supes as she does with many heroes. But with this movie it's really prominent. Snyder's Superman is way too conflicted for a lot of people. Don't get me wrong. I love the themes and questions posed about where Superman fits in today's world and how he's conflicted.
I just don't feel that's come full circle yet in how we view Superman.
Also it really shows that Patty was inspired by Donner's Superman. I think another big thing is Gal literally gives the best portrayal of the character. Just like how Reeves was Superman. Like you can't see anyone playing that role at the time.
The blue boyscout isn't naive? Hmm.
Gal played a great Wonder Woman. Patty wrote/directed a great Wonder Woman.
There's some Superman in there, though, made more apparent by the fact the universe feels kinda like it's missing one. As he is now, Cavill's doesn't feel like he can be the heart and soul and moral compass of a Justice League. She does.
As does Captain America. Deal with it
I think the biggest issue with Cavill's Superman is that the character is suffering from a lack of agency. We don't get a ton of moments where we hear him state why he does things or where he really makes decisions based on his own principles and world view. The movies kind of operate on the idea that this is Superman. You know what he's all about.
Part of the reason the "You are my world" at the end of BvS manages to land is that it's a rare moment where Clark states very plainly why he's about to take the action he's taking. The rest of the time, he's constantly conflicted and sort of being pushed around through the narrative. We don't get enough moments to really identify with him and get a feel for the "why?" of being Superman.
Beyond that, being Superman appears to be just him going through the motions. Which is probably the point, showing the burden of being Superman on this normal guy who just happens to have incredible powers. But when you have to compare him to characters like Cap or Wondy or even CW's Flash, who are all emotive, constantly stating and reiterating their principles, and acting with agency on those principles even in the face of challenges, he comes up a little short.
I think the biggest issue with Cavill's Superman is that the character is suffering from a lack of agency. We don't get a ton of moments where we hear him state why he does things or where he really makes decisions based on his own principles and world view. The movies kind of operate on the idea that this is Superman. You know what he's all about.
Part of the reason the "You are my world" at the end of BvS manages to land is that it's a rare moment where Clark states very plainly why he's about to take the action he's taking. The rest of the time, he's constantly conflicted and sort of being pushed around through the narrative. We don't get enough moments to really identify with him and get a feel for the "why?" of being Superman.
Beyond that, being Superman appears to be just him going through the motions. Which is probably the point, showing the burden of being Superman on this normal guy who just happens to have incredible powers. But when you have to compare him to characters like Cap or Wondy or even CW's Flash, who are all emotive, constantly stating and reiterating their principles, and acting with agency on those principles even in the face of challenges, he comes up a little short.
YUP. Cavill had something like 38 lines of dialog in BvS... That's not nearly enough for a character to state motivation and have really great character moments (or at least more than one).I think the biggest issue with Cavill's Superman is that the character is suffering from a lack of agency. We don't get a ton of moments where we hear him state why he does things or where he really makes decisions based on his own principles and world view. The movies kind of operate on the idea that this is Superman. You know what he's all about.
Part of the reason the "You are my world" at the end of BvS manages to land is that it's a rare moment where Clark states very plainly why he's about to take the action he's taking. The rest of the time, he's constantly conflicted and sort of being pushed around through the narrative. We don't get enough moments to really identify with him and get a feel for the "why?" of being Superman.
Beyond that, being Superman appears to be just him going through the motions. Which is probably the point, showing the burden of being Superman on this normal guy who just happens to have incredible powers. But when you have to compare him to characters like Cap or Wondy or even CW's Flash, who are all emotive, constantly stating and reiterating their principles, and acting with agency on those principles even in the face of challenges, he comes up a little short.
Yeah. While the Ultimate Edition of BvS smoothed things over compared to the theatrical, ideally BvS would've leaned harder into Superman being the protagonist and Batman being the antagonist (while obviously falling under the umbrella of Luthor).
This problem is compounded by the fact that he has practically no lines of dialogue in Man of Steel. So that's two movies in a row where he says very little.YUP. Cavill had something like 38 lines of dialog in BvS... That's not nearly enough for a character to state motivation and have really great character moments (or at least more than one).
Give the man some dialog and let him act. Cavill is a super charming dude. When I saw Man from UNCLE I was like,"Why am I not seeing him be like this?"