Is there something about TNA that makes them toxic to advertisers?
It's wrestling.
Think back to when WWE was super hot, they had all kinds of different advertising. Now they have a core group and that's about it.
Is there something about TNA that makes them toxic to advertisers?
TNA since it's inception has always brought in "old" talent but the "old" talent wasn't past their prime in the early days of TNA and i still believe that 2002-2005 were the best years of TNA, specially 02-04 when they were doing weekly ppv's.
People can shit on Jarret and Russo but i enjoyed what TNA was doing those few years more then i have with what WWE has been doing for the last decade and i am actually really excited for JJ's new promotion.
It became garbage when they shifted focus from X-division to washed ex-wwe guys.TNA is garbage and it was never not garbage.
Is there something about TNA that makes them toxic to advertisers?
TNA issued the following statement to Prowrestling.net on Thursday.
It has come to our attention that several internet news sources have falsely attributed statements to TNA, its executives and broadcasting partner. These false statements constitute defamation and if necessary we will seek all legal remedies available to us.
Powell's POV: At least I assume this statement is in response to the cancellation report that Dave Meltzer reported in the Wrestling Observer Newsletter. After all, TNA doesn't mention anything about the cancellation report specifically in this statement. Is this TNA's way of disputing the story without actually saying which story they are disputing?
TNA is denying this.
It's wrestling.
Think back to when WWE was super hot, they had all kinds of different advertising. Now they have a core group and that's about it.
Didn't they just have a "core group" back then as well? Like I can remember it being mostly stuff like Stridex Pads and Lugz Boots.
He was scared that Monday night. That is why they hyped that Raw and had the return of Bret Hart.
Is there something about TNA that makes them toxic to advertisers?
And yeah. Kurt Angle and Hardy would never be let in a WWE ring again. WWE have laid off the drug policy a bunch n recent years but no way they would let those 2 poster childs of drug abuse through the door. Angle especially is a timebomb waiting to go off.
I guess I could MAYBE see the Hardy Bros getting a RVD style run though with 3 months on, 3 months off though.
TNA is denying this.
He not in that bad of shape, he just put on a match of the year type match a few week ago.All this Kurt Angle talk...
Are there videos of his TNA antics or backstage videos that show what his abuse has let to? I wanna see how bad of a shape he is on right now.
LOL
TNA is trying to going to sue!
http://www.cagesideseats.com/tna-im...-against-internet-news-sources-for-defamation
Good luck with that, TNA.
Didn't they just move to that channel?
Damn.since September
And Castrol GTX.Didn't they just have a "core group" back then as well? Like I can remember it being mostly stuff like Stridex Pads and Lugz Boots.
You think Dave Meltzer is "sabotaging TNA" for real? You don't really believe that, right?
LOL TNA an archive of every fucked up and shitty creative decision TNA ever did
Considering Vince bought WCW for a whopping $2 million, I wonder how cheap he would be able to get TNA for
Not sure why he would want to, but maybe he has $500 burning a hole in his pocket
WCW had something of worth when it was up for sale, though
WCW had something of worth when it was up for sale, though
WCW had something of worth when it was up for sale, though
Buying TNA would mean recognizing that Stong wasn't actually purgatory for the past 15 years.If he can get it for cheap, I'm sure Vince will want the tape library for the Network and potential documentaries down the line.
Buying TNA would mean recognizing that Stong wasn't actually purgatory for the past 15 years.
ROH News: ROH announces 26-week Destination America television deal