SKluck said:It's not always just about the numbers. When the Spurs needed Manu in their wins, he was there. Duncan is not a game sealing player.
Eh, I agree, but I don't think that this difference between them was evident enough during this series to overcome the difference in stats. Manu was great in games 1 and 2, but he didn't need to come up big down the stretch since the games weren't close. He disappeared in games 3 and 4 just like Duncan did. Tonight, in the biggest game, Manu played well in the second half, but Duncan dominated it in several facets of the game.
It's not like Manu was great and clutch every game while Duncan was average and non-clutch every game. If that were the case, I would say that we would perhaps be justified in giving the MVP to Manu-- but it wasn't like that. Not this series.
