kevboard
Member
df wars wrong there is dlss
nothing said in the screenshot you posted is wrong tho. there's no evidence of any game using it yet...
df wars wrong there is dlss
df wars wrong there is dlss
They were saying they couldn't find evidence of DLSS being used. Not that it definitively wasn't there.
Docked1080p portable or docked mode?
Was this meant for someone else? I'm just talking about the claim that DF said Switch 2 "had no DLSS"
hows switch 2 runnin games better thens series s and ps4 pro with no dlss??nothing said in the screenshot you posted is wrong tho. there's no evidence of any game using it yet...
Its more powerful than Switch 2 in handheld mode. If its aged then Switch 2 is aged as well.Is the Steam Deck worth it? I'm interested in it but I hear it's a little aged at this point.
hows switch 2 runnin games better thens series s and ps4 pro with no dlss??
![]()
with those Jaguar CPU cores? probably not lol
It goes back further in time as timestamped in the video. They were always cynical it would have DLSS.
alllll games buuut maybe there is magicWasn't that only said about BoTW?Fake mentioned that in the notes previously. I have yet to see anything where DF said flatly that Switch 2 did not have DLSS.
alllll games buuut maybe there is magic
ahahaha no i quitThere is magic in whatever you are drinking right now
Is the Steam Deck worth it? I'm interested in it but I hear it's a little aged at this point.
Not worth it. Too dated at this point.
if you want to play lower end and AA titles, yes.
if you want a system that plays modern AAA games, no.
Its more powerful than Switch 2 in handheld mode. If its aged then Switch 2 is aged as well.
Rich literally said there is "promise" in the Switch 2 using DLSS at the end of the video. His skepticism was about upscaling from 720p to 4K.It goes back further in time as timestamped in the video. They were always cynical it would have DLSS.
No, I implied that horizon have nothing as demanding lol like it's not too CPU intensive, or it seems at leastYou were implying it can't do the physics.
I responded it can.
No, I implied that horizon have nothing as demanding lol like it's not too CPU intensive, or it seems at least
Botw is a Wii U game. So Wii U can but not PS4 lol. How about those graphics eh?Ah yes. It's all about physics now.
The Switch 1 CPU can do it but the PS4 CPU can't?
Botw is a Wii U game. So Wii U can but not PS4 lol. How about those graphics eh?
Also: News to me CPU only used for "intense physics". Nothing "intense" being done by the CPU for HZD then...
Horizon Zero Physics barely has any interactivity with the objects in its world. It also has many invisible walls within the world. Game logics are also laughably bad. No dynamic weather system.Absolutely correct.
I find it all laughable.
Then you have the resolution argument with the Switch 2.
The Switch 2 running a Wii U/Switch game called BOTW at 1440p/60fps is more impressive than the PS4 running Horizon at 1080p/30fps.
Going by that logic Jak and Daxter HD Trilogy on the PS3 is more impressive than Killzone 2.
Higher resolution and framerate.
Cynical? Ok....so that is prior speculation? We are talking about this claim that DF flatly said Switch 2 "had no DLSS". I've seen nothing that says that is the case.
But sure, they never said "never gonna have DLSS", just "I'm not sure tensor cores in a mobile ampere GPU is gonna cut it" which basically gave huge amounts of ammo for doubt that Switch 2 would get it.
Do we know what sort of DLSS implementation is being included with Switch?
Maybe he doesn't have anything to play. *shrug*I'd feel disgusted with myself if I couldn't stand Sony and just lived to shitpost in Sony threads all the time.
So they can break the long podcast up into smaller pieces and release them on their clips channel. Just wait a few days and you can see the pieces you're interested in.Two hours of these guys is a torture man, I don't understand why they keep making these long podcast just to talk about games visuals.
Do we know what sort of DLSS implementation is being included with Switch?
with those Jaguar CPU cores? probably not lol
Did they really say the switch 2 didn't have DLSS?DF still in denial with their predictions, much like their previous claims have aged like milk such as this thing not having DLSS so here we are again.
"its ps4 level" → Rich "absolutely" yea guys, aging like milk. Find me fortnite lumen + nanite on PS4.
Did they really say the switch 2 didn't have DLSS?
Horizon Zero Physics barely has any interactivity with the objects in its world. It also has many invisible walls within the world. Game logics are also laughably bad. No dynamic weather system.
HZD should be compared to Xenoblade X DE.
thirs is true?Rumor has DF boss making a new portable device so believing the takes they give...
![]()
![]()
the lvl of fanboyism go beyond stupidity, this is why we shouldn't do drugs kids.with those Jaguar CPU cores? probably not lol
the word you're looking for is optimized.BOTW ran on the wii u and was built with the wii u hardware in mind and that systems specs were trash. BOTW isn't an intensive game to run.
Runs at 30fps. Does RDR2 require two times the CPU demands of BOTW?RDR2 says hi
Runs at 30fps. Does RDR2 require two times the CPU demands of BOTW?
I never looked into how much faster the Jaguar is faster than whatever piece of crap CPU the Switch uses.
1080p DLSS Quality uses 720p as the base resolution, so of course performance will be lower than native 720p. And DF's video did show a significant performance improvement when going from native 1080p to 1080p DLSS quality. Hence their claim that DLSS was perfectly usable for this resolution. Talk about DLSS not cutting it was in reference to upscaling to 4K specifically, and if people used that to claim that DLSS was not usable at any resolution on Switch 2 class hardware, that's on them, not DF.While we have videos showcasing that 2050 laptop with still 80% of Switch 2 TOPS has increase in performance from native 1080p to DLSS quality 1080p while DF was showing that native 720p to DLSS quality 1080p was a drop in performance.
nope, rather slightly above ps4Sounds like it floats somewhere between PS4 Pro and Series S.
BoTW uses basic ass havok and that can be done on GPU compute on a PS4. In fact there was a havok demonstration on the GPU as part of the PS4 release presentation.He's talking about CPU, not graphics... And even when I think PS4 can do BOTW at 60 fps, I also believe BOTW physics are more intense in the hardware than anything CPU bound in Horizon
It is a double-edged sword. If they knew about it, they would be bound by an NDA and could not say anything.DF Direct is 90% a waste of time. The only times I'm interested in it is when they add to their previous analysis videos or have dev insights/comments into stuff.
Listening to them just speculating about hardware is utterly useless because they're far from experts about it. The guys on the Cemu Discord know a lot more about the Switch's hardware, emulation, and Tegra/NVIDIA than anyone in the DF crew. That they spend hours just talking and talking about 10 minutes of footage is insane to me.
Up to now this is all we have on the Switch 2 spec. In the direct Nintendo only mentioned the screen spec and the two modes Metroid prime 4 Switch edition ran at. And of course the Nvidia Switch 2 press release.
![]()
Nintendo Switch 2 Leveled Up With NVIDIA AI-Powered DLSS and 4K Gaming
The Nintendo Switch 2 takes performance to the next level, powered by a custom NVIDIA processor featuring an NVIDIA GPU with dedicated RT Cores and Tensor Cores for stunning visuals and AI-driven enhancements.blogs.nvidia.com
Processor | Nvidia T234 | Nvidia T239 (Switch 2) |
CPU cores | 12x ARM A78AE | 8x ARM A78C |
CPU clock speed | 1.43GHz | Up to 1100MHz (estimate) |
CUDA cores | 2048 | 1536 |
Memory Interface | 256-bit / LPDDR5 | 128-bit / LPDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 204GB/s | Up to 102GB/s (estimate) |