I see some persecuption complex here.Switch 2 haters in shambles
![]()
![]()
I see some persecuption complex here.Switch 2 haters in shambles
![]()
![]()
I agree. Imo the best Ubi game of the generation for the best or the worst.I think it's good, very fun game for stealth fans. It's also one of the best uses of SW IP in gaming so far.
It does look awful. If you have a better platform to play it on, definitely play it there. The visual downgrades are very evident. Same goes for Cronos.But I thought we had another thread saying this game was/looked awful running on Switch 2... Surely they weren't wrong??? And here I was thinking Switch 2 couldn't run current gen games well enough.
Wait for a 50% discount in November.Wow. Should I buy this? Fuck.
There wasn't a need to this time. The drama last weekend shaped the story. The game went from zero to hero due to bad impressions. DF read GAF. They know what the people want.I'm surprised they didn't nitpick things that aren't a problem
I beg to say probably it's one of the best game graphically in a portable console (until Steam 2 come I guess).It does look awful. If you have a better platform to play it on, definitely play it there. The visual downgrades are very evident. Same goes for Cronos.
That said, if portable play matters, or if Switch 2 is your only option, then these ports are totally fine (for what they are).
Wait for a 50% discount in November.
It's complicated. It's both extremely impressive and repulsive. I could probably stomach it if I tried, but I wouldn't be happy. Same thing with Doom 2016 and Doom Eternal on the OG Switch. Like, yeah they're impressive... but yuck.I beg to say probably it's the best game graphically in a portable console (until Steam 2 come I guess).
I don't know. For a portable seems extremely good? I never considered the switch 2 an home console.It's complicated. It's both extremely impressive and repulsive. I could probably stomach it if I tried, but I wouldn't be happy. Same thing with Doom 2016 and Doom Eternal on the OG Switch. Like, yeah they're impressive... but yuck.
Too many cuts for my taste. Even in portable.I don't know. For a portable seems extremely good? I never considered the switch 2 an home console.
But I mean, it CAN! It needs cutbacks obviously as it is a handheld as opposed to a console/PC but it still can play these games and competently enough that you are getting the full experience. Not bad for a handheld.It can't. Don't worry. I mean not without important cutbacks. But surely this is an impressive port.
I have to say some cutbacks are very important if you are obsessed to the graphics tech. To the eyes catch seems quite close but big water pool or rivers use cube maps and not raytracing at all, which is really an old tech; I noticed it just now (peope there thought was raytracing). Ubisoft has smartly used a lot of artistical tricks.But I mean, it CAN! It needs cutbacks obviously as it is a handheld as opposed to a console/PC but it still can play these games and competently enough that you are getting the full experience. Not bad for a handheld.
Because Switch 2 haters don't exist on GAF, right? Matter of fact, Sony nor MS haters exist either...I see some persecuption complex here.
Well, it is an Xbox after all!The guy who made that 'disaster' video also backtracked on it saying he was wrong.
Not sure what DF are shilling for here, the Microsoft Switch 2?
Cutbacks are minor and this is even using ray tracing wirh beign even 1440 docked. It clearly can. The proof is right there. Its one of the most demanding games. Not to mention that multiple developers confirms the same thing. Any game on series s would run. Cpu bound games require some optimazations. There isnt a single game now at this point. But lets see, maybe if a game strugle 30fps on ps5 pro, maybe it require a lot more optimzations like they did with witcher 3 on switch. But i dont think that would be with the current gen situation. Prob nextgen games is more of a questionIt can't. Don't worry. I mean not without important cutbacks. But surely this is an impressive port.
Are you ONLY looking at graphics? Cause if you have to have cutbacks in certain graphical features yet get to play the full game, then yes, you are still getting the full experience. I mean, would you say you aren't getting the full experience playing on performance mode on PS5 as it cuts down graphical features?
No. Yes.Are you ONLY looking at graphics? Cause if you have to have cutbacks in certain graphical features yet get to play the full game, then yes, you are still getting the full experience. I mean, would you say you aren't getting the full experience playing on performance mode on PS5 as it cuts down graphical features?
Like rage baiting isn't constantly abused after the Switch 2 Direct up to these days...Because Switch 2 haters don't exist on GAF, right? Matter of fact, Sony nor MS haters exist either...
Reminds me of a saying I've heard, "A hit dog will holler"...![]()
The most of the "haters" say switch 2 specs are underwhelming, it's not exactly hate it.Because Switch 2 haters don't exist on GAF, right? Matter of fact, Sony nor MS haters exist either...
Reminds me of a saying I've heard, "A hit dog will holler"...![]()
Said that, I'm the first who said it's really an excellent port but I'm not sure what exactly Oliver of DF has seen of so special in his raytracing. It's really limited and with important cutbacks. He mentioned at least reflections has been replaced in the river in Toshara with cube maps?So now graphics care, all these years pretending.....
Nintendo make you pay for upgrades games without.ray tracing lol.
Steam Deck and Switch 2 portable are extremely similar in performance in raster, with a slight edge overall to the Deck. However, thanks to Ampere being significantly better at RT vs RDNA2 the Switch 2 will pull ahead with any game using RT this heavily.So are we back to Switch 2 Docked > Switch 2 > Steam Deck in performance yet? Or can the Deck get to this level with some patches maybe? This game can't even run in a playable state on the Deck iirc.
Still love the power/performance profile of the Switch 2, particularly docked @ under 20W.
Oh boy, here we go
![]()
Glad I don't think the same way as you. Best you only play games with the best GPU you can find and game that way.No. Yes.
Tie Fighter says helloI think it's good, very fun game for stealth fans. It's also one of the best uses of SW IP in gaming so far.
GVG played an early build and reported on that. GVG also released an apology video apologizing for assuming the final build would be as bad as the early build, even saying it's much better than what they played before.I thought thread was a thread that said this ran like shit?
Tie Fighter says hello
You mean native? It seems extremely unlikely.
Nah just proven to be a load of bollocks though by games like thisThe most of the "haters" say switch 2 specs are underwhelming, it's not exactly hate it.
I'd pay almost any price for a modern port of TF that had controller support and mildly updated visuals. I know TFTC exists but something official and plug-and-play would be so welcome.Should have added "in last 20 years".
Only Jedi FO and Survivor were good games. I think Outlaws being open world with multiple planets and lots of npcs, side quests etc. truly uses the lore correctly.
Just making a note here, even though it has its own thread.
Steam Deck and Switch 2 portable are extremely similar in performance in raster, with a slight edge overall to the Deck. However, thanks to Ampere being significantly better at RT vs RDNA2 the Switch 2 will pull ahead with any game using RT this heavily.
Nah just proven to be a load of bollocks though by games like this
![]()
Should have added "in last 20 years".
Only Jedi FO and Survivor were good games. I think Outlaws being open world with multiple planets and lots of npcs, side quests etc. truly uses the lore correctly.