LordOcidax
Member
Are people really expecting native 4k60/30 in lots of games from a OCRX480/Jaguar?.... This is going to be Neo all over again... I was hoping for a vega/rysen combo.
Your not reading my post right, I am saying racing game genre is NOT a good benchmark for gaming power.
Wake me up and lets talk when a console can do Witcher 3 at 60 FPS, thats all I want, looks like we will have to wait until next gen to get 60 FPS gaming on AAA open world games.
Scorpio looks good, but Sony could of dumped at Vortex cooler on the Pro and upped the specs last year, I have 2 Ps4 pro and 1080 vs 4K is nice but I want more frame rate power.
Good job MS but it looks like ZEN is just too big a beast for consoles in 2017
Yes, discussing price point of upcoming hardware is extremely odd and nerdy
Games magazines have never done this from the beginning
Someone break this down for me;
Wouldn't this mean a lot more than just 'a custom 2.3ghz' cpu?
So the extra power and optimization is all for naught and no improvements will be seen?
Might as well just scrap it then, such a horrible design and all. I'll just go build a PC and ascend to the land of the master race just to be sure. It's the only way.
Well its not like Jaguar is suddenly a Zen CPU, but it means the Jaguar cores are free to-do a lot more.Someone break this down for me;
Wouldn't this mean a lot more than just 'a custom 2.3ghz' cpu?
Oh I'm not criticizing the CPU. It was the only logical choice for the system, and really the only option MS had was to upclock the Jag and put in some extras to help. There is nothing wrong with what they did.
I just think the people acting like it's a bigger improvement than it is are kinda silly.
Someone break this down for me;
Wouldn't this mean a lot more than just 'a custom 2.3ghz' cpu?
it's not a generational leap. it is designed to run games at xbox one quality or higher at native 4k.
next gen would hopefully be better than current gen fidelity + native 4k.
If Forza 4K demo has so much GPU utilization headroom (sorry Matt), I wonder maybe they can shift more CPU load over.I mean higher memory bandwidth and more gpu power but the cpu is clocked .2 ghz higher.
Technically, Jaguars can't hit 2.3 GHz. There is probably some silicon changes.
Wait, I guess the GPU improvements don't reach the targeted 6TFlops then?
The memory increase is very much welcome, though. Don't know why Sony thought keeping the same 8GB was a good idea.
This. And that's totally fine.My guess.
$499.
I also wonder why they increased the memory availability for the OS/Dashboard now that Snap/Pip are gone.
After watching the videos, the Scorpio will cost $499.
Technically, Jaguars can't hit 2.3 GHz. There is probably some silicon changes.
From the article I dunno how much real world change this will have though
Why? By any real metric I'd say it's a more mainstream architecture than XB1.
Being the only platform with a user-managed SRAM pool was much more of an optimization liability.
I love digital foundry and their technical expertise, but Leadbetter is foolish for pushing the $499 narrative.
Native 4K at 60 is what next gen should be shooting for and if that's what this claims to be then that's what it claims to be.
I think 'has to' is a bit negative. Microsoft now have the (much) more powerful console but Sony are still in charge.
Cut the price of the Pro and Slim PS4, make sure the release calendar is still tight, and the sales will keep on trucking on.
this won't be running games that run at 900p30 on XB1 at native 4k60.Native 4K at 60 is what next gen should be shooting for and if that's what this claims to be then that's what it claims to be.
It's a PS4 Pro one year later.
Specs are as expected, 6 Teraflops, Jaguar derivative CPU, 12GB GDDR5 with 8 usable by developers. Dreams of Zen, more than 6TF, 4K60fps in most games etc were the same of the magical 5.5TF Pro.
I expect they will be able to deliver a decent chunk of games at native 4K but we'll still hear about non native techniques like checkerboarding as well in many games.
Now Microsoft has to deliver with price (because competition won't stay at 399$ for long) but most importantly games.
This. And that's totally fine.
Well, I kinda know.Unless we know, in overall CPU workload percentage during rendering, how much CPU workload is saved by having draw calls processed by dedicated hardware outside the CPU, it's seems like an adjective battle where no one is right.
I also wonder why they increased the memory availability for the OS/Dashboard now that Snap/Pip are gone.
This is like that infamous Mattrick's line lol
you're not wrong though
What is this?
Wow.
I am pretty sure the pro will get a price cut by the xmas holiday/Microsoft scorpio release
Thanks, but I am also a PS4, Vita and Nintendo player / owner as well. I don't discriminate.
This isn't going to be running new AAA games at native 4k 60fps.
It clever narrative to push.
It make it sound expensive and powerful, set expectations and crush it when they announce $399.
Also jaguar is 28nm...this is 16 finfet...this is a customized silicons with the underpinnings of jaguar...like they said
That doesn't stop PC from having improved textures, why would it stop Scorpio?
The difference this time is they will still have the Xbox One S which will do a good enough job at running all the new releases that come out for the Xbox brand and will be very reasonably priced. May even see an Xbox Scorpio mini released as a refresh and to keep the styling the same.
Then the Scorpio is the premium console for core gamers who want the best gaming experience. The market has been changing over the past few years with more focus on core gamers, premium hardware and e-sports. Rather than motion control, budget hardware and casual market.
I am pretty sure the pro will get a price cut by the xmas holiday/Microsoft scorpio release