Baemono
Gold Member
It is ? Why ?
DigitalFoundry: Metal Gear Solid Delta - Xbox Series X|S Tech Review - X Faster Than PS5? Plus Patch 1.1.2 Tested!
- Thread starter GrayChild
- Start date
CrimsonTide
Gold Member
Does the god damn caution alert never die?
I'm up here on a roof top chillin. It counts down and once it nears the end, it goes back to 99. No one can see my redneck ass on this hot ass rooftop dressed like a clown.
Y'all. Cmon now. What is this?
I'm up here on a roof top chillin. It counts down and once it nears the end, it goes back to 99. No one can see my redneck ass on this hot ass rooftop dressed like a clown.
Y'all. Cmon now. What is this?
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
yes, its running the same game underneath like most remakes. this is not a brand new remake like Silent Hill 2, RE2,RE3 and RE4. It's more akin to bluepoint remakes like SOTC and Demon Souls. And yes, that might make it more expensive. Especially on a single threaded engine like UE5. Pre UE5.4 anyway.
Virtuous only helped with this game. This was done by an internal konami team and their decision to skip the 30 fps version on the Pro. If virtuous had made that decision, they wouldve included a 30 fps mode like they did with the Oblivion Remastered on the Pro. Sometimes devs just make dumb decisions. Outlaws and a couple of others games back at launch also skipped a 60 fps option with forced PSSR on the Pro back at launch before doing a 180 and adding toggles.
This game runs fine on PC as long as you have a decent CPU and a GPU above a 9-10 tflops equivalent 4060. The game is definitely heavy but you can reduce some settings to high or medium and have a solid 60 fps experience. this is not the same as oblivion which was trash even on modern CPUs and GPUs. Or Stalker. this is more like Wukong or SH2. CPU bound in some rare scenarios but mostly very heavy on the GPU because they are pushing all the big UE5 features.
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
wrong thread.
try asking here:
Gold Gifted By
@Idleyes
Thank You
SPOILER WARNING
After the end of World War II,
the world was split into two -- East and West.
This marked the beginning of the era called the Cold War.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Last edited:
CrimsonTide
Gold Member
You right.wrong thread.
try asking here:
Gold Gifted By
@Idleyes
Thank You
SPOILER WARNING
After the end of World War II,
the world was split into two -- East and West.
This marked the beginning of the era called the Cold War.
GENERAL INFORMATION
...
I'll say this. Game runs BUTTER smooth on my peasant PS5. Not counting frames. So can't say. But feels 60
Because in the past made some big mistakes.
Last edited:
Radical_3d
Member
I'm not arguing with NeoGAF's Unreal Engine 5 #1 fan about this. Aside from a walking simulator I haven't seen a game that is a performer on that thing. And said walking simulator was 30 fps and blurry for a year and a half. It's a cancer.
Signed:
— NeoGAF's Unreal Engine 5 #1 hater.
Banisher of Dontnod runs quite well on ps5 pro to be fair. At least for a good chunk of the game, I'm not going to far off yet. Quite surprised to found so few traversal stutters and quite tolerable.
Banishers doesn't use plague "features" like lumen and nanite
Are you sure?Not Lumen GI highly probable but nanite I can't say.
I can't be 100% sure, but this is what the tech sites saying like dsogaming for example
Banishers: Ghosts of New Eden Benchmarks & PC Performance Analysis
Powered by Unreal Engine 5, it's time to benchmark Banishers: Ghosts of New Eden and examine its performance on the PC.
www.dsogaming.com
Game's performance also a strong sign that it's free of this garbage
What it's even the point to use UE5 if everything is disabled I don't get it.I can't be 100% sure, but this is what the tech sites saying like dsogaming for example
Banishers: Ghosts of New Eden Benchmarks & PC Performance Analysis
Powered by Unreal Engine 5, it's time to benchmark Banishers: Ghosts of New Eden and examine its performance on the PC.
Game's performance also a strong sign that it's free of this garbage
Last edited:
Radical_3d
Member
A good engine wouldn't need a 16TF machine to run every game. It'd be good in a 10TF machine:
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
A good engine wouldn't need a 16TF machine to run every game. It'd be good in a 10TF machine:
UE5's had games that perform well and games that don't. The engine is doing some forward looking rendering things on console hardware like Lumen RT and has clawed back as much as 40% CPU performance with code-base updates, it's a pretty good, versatile, engine all things considered.
Some devs just get over-ambitious with visual flair over performance.
Last edited:
twilo99
Member
Why not AMD?
TGO
Hype Train conductor. Works harder than it steams.
Raised blacks
Liopleurodon
Member
Nobody cares about AMD.
DanielG165
Member
Yep. I've played quite a few UE5 games that have and do run extremely well, both on PC and on console. It's ultimately a tool; whether it's used efficiently or not is down to the developer.
TGO
Hype Train conductor. Works harder than it steams.
While I do like to see his findings, a lot of his recommendations are targeted at his TV and doesn't translate for everyone and when it comes to the actual gaming part he doesn't know what his talking about.
Thanks for posting though
Bojji
Member
While I do like to see his findings, a lot of his recommendations are targeted at his TV and doesn't translate for everyone and when it comes to the actual gaming part he doesn't know what his talking about.
Thanks for posting though
I personally used -2 brightness way before his video. It lowers black level (still not 100% fix without lowering vrr black level in TV settings).
UE5 wasn't thinking to run to 60 fps on base console, to be fair. Yes it's improved a lot lately but most of the UE5 games not run at stable 60 fps on base consoles outside if they targeting mainly 60 fps. But they have a lot of important compromises.A good engine wouldn't need a 16TF machine to run every game. It'd be good in a 10TF machine:
Last edited:
UltimaKilo
Gold Member
This is the attitude I have, although I always wait a month after release of a game to get a good patch. Heck, outside of the memory leaks, I was fine with Oblivion remaster.Can't have fun. I'm told it's ass. No fun here. None. zero.
(Lies)
Nah. No joke. Smooth as butter feeling to me. Not counting frames here. Just messing around and enjoying it.
I'm genuinely unfamiliar with MGS3
Only really played MGS and MGS2 (MGS5 also)
But yeah. Kinda first for me on this one
These small issues should be behind us anyway. I can't see any new games release on these older versions of UE 5.
Radical_3d
Member
An engine that is not targeting 60 on consoles is what I call a bad engine. I think Epic started on this one generation too early and UE5 should be skipped in development until then.
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Nah, can't agree with this take at all, unfortunately. UE5 is good and only getting better.
Imagine SH2 remake running on Unity and shudder.
Neither UE3 or UE4 targeting 60 fps though. 60 fps on console it's started to be a thing just this generation.
Last edited:
twilo99
Member
u wrong
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
That means every engine this gen is a bad engine. Remedy's northlight, Massive's snowdrop, Capcom's RE-Engine, Square's FF16 engine, Bethesda's creation engine, all have drops below 60 fps in big cities or when action ramps up. Despite resolutions dropping all the way down to 720p.
Then you have the AC shadows Anvil engine that literally gets rid of RTGI in the 60 fps performance mode just to hit 60 fps. Like literally gives you a last gen version. CDPR did the same thing on consoles, no RT in performance mode in Cyberpunk. Dragon Age Veilguard as well. No RT. Last gen graphics to hit 60 fps. That leaves the ID tech and Machine Games engine that does hit 60 fps with RT but looks last gen as fuck. Or sony or nintendo first party games that look last gen as fuck but do hit 60 fps.
At least with UE5, you are getting nanite and lumen in the 60 fps modes.
