Direct X 11.1 is Windows 8 exclusive, no plans to retrofit

Meh. The pulled the same shit with DX10 and Vista. Doesn't make it right, but not surprising either. I have Windows 8 on my gaming rig anyways
3AQmK.gif
 
I was at a MS event last week and basically while absolutely nothing is official the general feeling floating around is they may try to only include the desktop on the pro edition of the next Windows. This will ensure corporations will say absolutely nothing while still locking up the non-biz marketplace. Non-biz users will be pushed towards office 365, which only requires a browser to run, or even an app version of it.

If they do that and go in that direction Linux will finally get its "Year of the Desktop" :P
 
No thank you, Microsoft. I'll stand being Gabe and Notch on this one.

I'll not be going along with this, knowing what they did to Halo 2.
 
Really guys? You didn't see that one coming from a mile away? As soon as I heard about Win 8 I knew this was in the works as well. They did it before so why wouldn't they do it now?

As someone mentioned though, it's really nasty of them to make something numbered 11.1 only run on the new platform. Obviously if it's just an iteration of 11 then it would run just fine on Win 7 and I expect someone to hack it to work on 7, like they did with DX10 and Win XP.
 
So if I don't have a 3D set-up it won't effect me? Call me when they release DX12, by then Windows 9 should be the hot new thing though.
 
Could someone please summarize what developers (like notch and Gabe) have against win 8.

I use Steam with no qualms on win 8. No different than I was using it on 7.

I install and use software outside of metro just fine.

Metro is not forced on me, is just there.
 
Hopefully it'll be easily hacked into Win7.


This sort of shit should be illegal.


Could someone please summarize what developers (like notch and Gabe) have against win 8.

I use Steam with no qualms on win 8. No different than I was using it on 7.

I install and use software outside of metro just fine.

Metro is not forced on me, is just there.

They want to turn it into a closed device with an IOS like store so they can get a cut on every sale.
 
I am absolutely shocked, shocked I tell you, that contrary to the defense force's accusations of tinfoil hattery this is happening. Who could have seen that coming?

To quote myself in an older thread:

Do we have to start laying out cases were Microsoft obfuscated or outright denied access to APIs for competing programs in order for you guys to get what people are getting worked up about? How are you supposed to judge something but ignore previous behavior?

People complaining about this (including me) feel this is a very possible future development:

a) Win 8 comes. Metro and Desktop apps are separate but equal.
b) Win 8 SP 1 comes out. "Due to new security protocolls only certified programs will have full access to features A through D of the OS." Desktop developers have to figure out workarounds or put their applications on the Windows Store.
c) The next DirectX comes out. "Hey we did some low level stuff for performance and power consumption that are only reachable for certified programs." Desktop developers lose feature parity with Metro developers.

Now, will this definitely happen? No. Does the Store put Microsoft in a position to make this happen on such a scale for the first time ever? Yes. Have they behaved in such a way before? Yes. Are we supposed to take their good faith on default? According to some you're Stallman if you don't.

It appears I was more trusting of Microsoft than I needed.
 
Could someone please summarize what developers (like notch and Gabe) have against win 8.

I use Steam with no qualms on win 8. No different than I was using it on 7.

I install and use software outside of metro just fine.

Metro is not forced on me, is just there.

The idea is Metro will be forced on us in the future as far as gaming is concerned, all this is just leading up to it.
 
And practically no games will use 11.1, then. At least not in a meaningful way that's worth it for 99% of gamers.

As it essentially is with even DX11 right now. I have a DX11 GPU, but not a ton of games have meaningful DX11 in them. I doubt 11.1 will have any overly meaningful updates to it anyway.

I will re-evaluate Windows 8 when the first service pack comes out.
 
The Win 9 - 8 analogy has nothing to do with 7 - Vista because anyone with a pulse knows what MS is doing here. It's the first step towards a closed platform. They've been trying to kill PC gaming for almost a decade now (minus a half hearted attempt here and there) and get them into the royalty paying console ecosystem.

The fact they now have Apple envy and are eying even bigger royalties (if they can completely close the platform off) makes this the most telegraphiced pass in computer history. The end game of this shift is blatently obvious.
 
10.1 was pretty useless. 11.1 will be the same. Though I use Windows 8 and love it, it's unlikely I'll be able to benefit from 11.1 due to the limitations they are imposing here. Bring on 12!
 
Hopefully it'll be easily hacked into Win7.


This sort of shit should be illegal.

Why? DirectX and Windows are Microsoft's property, they can do whatever they want with them. The reaction the gaming community is having over Windows 8 is ridiculous, just goes to show some people can't adapt to something simple like a UI change.
 
Valve needs to work double time with ATI, Nvidia, Intel and all the game devs on making Linux the new king.

I somehow see MS suing Valve out of all this. I don't know on what grounds but I see it happening.
As for Windows 8, I bet it bombs, we got an excellent release on 7, followed by something that is trying to push a new UI.
Hopefully this is not the Wii equivalent of grabbing a new target audience that hasn't really existed in the past which would marginalise the hardcore base.

Only time will tell.
 
Why? DirectX and Windows are Microsoft's property, they can do whatever they want with them. The reaction the gaming community is having over Windows 8 is ridiculous, just goes to show some people can't adapt to something simple like a UI change.
Ever heard of Monopoly laws?

Internet Explorer is also their property and it didnt' stop them from getting sued over and over again.
 
Also, it's hilarious that people still hate Windows 8 when a simple little program called Start8 makes Windows 8 just like Windows 7, but better and with more features. I just don't understand how anyone could hate something that is better than what they're already using.
 
As for Windows 8, I bet it bombs, we got an excellent release on 7, followed by something that is trying to push a new UI.
Have you actually tried Windows 8? It's essentially a better version of Windows 7 with a tiled start menu and a built-in smartphone-like store. Most of the whining is from people that don't have it installed, cos if they did, they'd be wondering what the fuss is all about - every piece of software that I used on Windows 7 works fine on Windows 8. There's even easy ways to bring the Start menu back if you really want it.
 
Hopefully it'll be easily hacked into Win7.

This sort of shit should be illegal.

They want to turn it into a closed device with an IOS like store so they can get a cut on every sale.

The idea is Metro will be forced on us in the future as far as gaming is concerned, all this is just leading up to it.

I have stated, as an user of win 8, I can install software outside of metro. Download .exe and install. Completely outside of metro and their store front.

Is there a statement from microsoft saying that they will disable installing software that way?

Until that happens this is some tinfoil NRA "they are going to take our guns" kind of crazyness.

Mind you, I'm not saying that everyone should like Win 8. But the idea that Metro is being forced as a way to install and distribute software on win 8 is Factually false.
 
Well this is incredibly stupid. So does that mean there are going to be DX11 and DX11.1 modes now like there were DX9 and DX10 modes between XP and Vista?

You'd figure after the reaction they got from pulling this on Vista, they wouldn't repeat the same mistake again.
 
what if the xbox3 will support 11.1? Than every multi game will support it on the PC.

It's such a small update. I'm sure we'll see plenty of games supporting 11.1 on PC, but those games are not going to be 11.1 only. They'll be games that work well in 3D on any card that supports a 3D output (using the native 3D resolution support Windows 8 has) and they'll be games that multitask better.

They won't look any prettier or run any better on Windows 8 than they will on Windows 7.
 
Right now, DirectX 11.1 is simply a post in the ground. That post may just be to put up a shiny new bird feeder in the yard, or it may be the first in a series of posts that eventually form a fence...

I have stated, as an user of win 8, I can install software outside of metro. Download .exe and install. Completely outside of metro and their store front.

Is there a statement from microsoft saying that they will disable installing software that way.

Until that happens this is some tinfoil NRA "they are going to take our guns" kind of crazyness.

Mind you, I'm not saying that everyone should like Win 8. But the idea that Metro is being forced as a way to install and distribute software on win 8 is Factually false.

What you don't seem to understand is that it's just another step in that direction... The time to throw a fit about this stuff is NOW before any possible implementation... not after microsoft has put up the fence.
 
Have you actually tried Windows 8? It's essentially a better version of Windows 7 with a tiled start menu and a built-in smartphone-like store. Most of the whining is from people that don't have it installed, cos if they did, they'd be wondering what the fuss is all about - every piece of software that I used on Windows 7 works fine on Windows 8. There's even easy ways to bring the Start menu back if you really want it.

I installed it the day it became available. I did the same with Windows 7. With one difference. After trying Win 7 for two days I uninstalled XP. After trying Win 8 for two weeks I went back to 7.
 
... what?

Microsoft was sued on the basis that they used their OS dominance to leverage Internet Explorer (against other browsers). They're now using their DirectX dominance on Windows to leverage Windows 8 (against other versions of Windows). The only person that could possibly sue them for doing this is, uh, Microsoft.
 
Not a problem if not many developers use it...









Goddammit, I swear to god Crytek, I know you will be the first to jump. To this day you are not even using your own tech at full potential, why do you need a decimal for?
 
I have stated, as an user of win 8, I can install software outside of metro. Download .exe and install. Completely outside of metro and their store front.

Is there a statement from microsoft saying that they will disable installing software that way?

Until that happens this is some tinfoil NRA "they are going to take our guns" kind of crazyness.

Mind you, I'm not saying that everyone should like Win 8. But the idea that Metro is being forced as a way to install and distribute software on win 8 is Factually false.

No one is saying that, why are you missreading what people are saying? What they have been doing however, points in every way that eventually it will be the only way to install software on a windows PC.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=498468
 
Could someone please summarize what developers (like notch and Gabe) have against win 8.
[...]
Metro is not forced on me, is just there.
It's not against win8 as it is, but what it foreshadows: sure, the desktop is there, but the very architecture of the thing has opened the door for it not being there in win9 if Metro takes off. It's not just a worst-case supposition, every Microsoft dev event is geared towards that direction. They're pushing Office and even the dev tools towards the cloud, the business products like SharePoint are turning towards more app-like models, XNA is unofficially considered dead for game prototyping because it can't run on Metro, they've tried to make the newer Visual Studio Express only able to compile Metro apps (and only went back because devs complained) and so on.

The core of their current message to devs is how easy it is to switch and not look back, and how portable it is: a metro app will run pretty much the same on desktop and mobile, and nobody's missing the obvious underlying message, that the next console will run Metro apps all the same and so you'll get free console-to-PC conversions, no need to port to the Win desktop.

And it *is* a wonderful, very functional thing. I'd switch to Metro any day if it weren't for the closed marketplace, where I can't just put up software for download with a PayPal link, but where I need a MS-approved account, a MS credit check, MS-dictated price range for selling MS-approved software on which MS will perceive a 30% cut. But they've definitely put the framework together for it to happen, all they need to do is switch off the legacy desktop, something they can perfectly do as soon as it's not a commercial danger to them.
 
Right now, DirectX 11.1 is simply a post in the ground. That post may just be to put up a shiny new bird feeder in the yard, or it may be the first in a series of posts that eventually form a fence...



What you don't seem to understand is that it's just another step in that direction... The time to throw a fit about this stuff is NOW before any possible implementation... not after microsoft has put up the fence.

Right now, DirectX 11.1 is simply a post in the ground. That post may just be to put up a shiny new bird feeder in the yard, or it may be the first in a series of posts that eventually form a fence.

Please lay down the path in which this is going to happen.

1. Make DX11.1 exclusive to win 8.
2. ?????
3. ?????
4. Metro storefront is required to install all software to win 8.

Even Apple with their app store doesn't require developers to use their storefront to install software in OSX. That is, if something changed since i sold my macbook. I will admit to be wrong if this is the issue. But AFAIK you can just download the DMG, unpack and runs application on Mac OSX.

There's no precedent for this.

Of all the things that people complain about Win 8, justified or not, why do they hinge on this?

No one is saying that, why are you missreading what people are saying? What they have been doing however, points in every way that eventually it will be the only way to install software on a windows PC.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=498468

Application that want to be part of the Metro interface require to be sold on the win store and pass cert. I have not stated otherwise.

There's no indication that they will take the ability from developers and users to install software outside of the storefront. Like I said, not even apple is doing this with their storefront. The article you pointed is just speculation.

Call me naive, but Why would microsoft do it? When even apple is not doing it.
 
Please lay down the path in which this is going to happen.

1. Make DX11.1 exclusive to win 8.
2. ?????
3. ?????
4. Metro storefront is required to install all software to win 8.

Even Apple with their app store doesn't require developers to use their storefront to install software in OSX. That is, if something changed since i sold my macbook. I will admit to be wrong if this is the issue. But AFAIK you can just download the DMG, unpack and runs application on Mac OSX.

There's no precedent for this.

Of all the things that people complain about Win 8, justified or not, why do they hinge on this?

Not win 8, win 9 with DX12 exclusive to win 9.

Wanna play that brand new game? Well shit, you can't, buy win9 so that MS can take 30% of developers money for doing nothing but shitty certifications that will only make your games even worst.
 
You know if I was a conspiracy theorist I would swear this is an attempt at Microsoft to cripple and restrict PC gaming as much as possible. It is no secret that Microsoft considers the PC platform to be a competitor to their console (they have said as much in the past). What better way to restrict PC gaming than to make the key component of the gaming platform exclusive to Win 8. This will ensure most PC devs won't touch 11.1 for years because most pc gamers won't have access to 11.1 with them rocking win 7.

That is what I would be saying if I was a conspiracy theorist, but I am not. So that is definitely not what is happening and it is all wonderful and light, windows 8 is wonderful blah blah blah, no dodgy shit going on blah blah blah.
 
Of all the things that people complain about Win 8, justified or not, why do they hinge on this?
They think that because Metro apps can only be installed through the Windows Store, that ALL apps will have to be installed that way in every version of Windows, perhaps as soon as Windows 9. In other words, they have so much tin-foil wrapped around their craniums, that they can't think straight. Windows 8 is as open as Windows 7 was. The Windows Store is additional to what existed in Windows 7. It doesn't replace desktop software - if it did, I wouldn't be using it and I'd be on the "fuck this shit!" train too.
 
It's still not enough to make me move from 7 to 8. If a game comes out that requires it and I consider it a must play then I'll think about it. Otherwise I think (hope) most developers will realize that developing a game exclusive to Windows 8 would be silly from a financial perspective.
 
No fucking way I'm upgrading to Win 8. I like 7 just fine, thank you.
 
Here we go again, whats worse is that given the next-gen of consoles being on par with current-gen PCs, youll have to upgrade. With DX10/11, its only much later that we got any benefit, by then fortunately Windows 7 was out.
 
Top Bottom