infiniteloop
Member
andylsun said:Wonderful. But no two-parter finale?
nope
andylsun said:Wonderful. But no two-parter finale?
infiniteloop said:nope
ultron87 said:So the more I think about it the fact that Old Amy saw Old Amy refuse to help when she was Young Amy but then did something different when it was her turn is so whibbly wobbly that it is breaking my brain.
There was no new variable to that conversation that would've changed anything. Gah!
ultron87 said:So the more I think about it the fact that Old Amy saw Old Amy refuse to help when she was Young Amy but then did something different when it was her turn is so whibbly wobbly that it is breaking my brain.
There was no new variable to that conversation that would've changed anything. Gah!
bobs99 ... said:Didnt the Doctor even bring that point up in the show? He said something about her being so unpredictable something something. To be fair ive forgotten the line, and it may not even be relevant to that point.
DoctorWho said:Yeah, there's something strange about that. Although, I think there is something strange about Amy in general. She's able will things back into existence if she thinks really hard. Maybe she has a time head.
barbecube said:That was a pretty Amy-fail episode - nothing that happens is really because of a decision she made. This season's Amy is a lot less of a protagonist than last season's, and it's pretty disappointing. She's developing a pretty serious damsel-in-distress complex.
brucewaynegretzky said:When did this show stop being about the Doctor and start being about Amy? Gah! So frustrated. I liked the episode, but I still get the feeling more and more that Amy has become the focus. It probably has a lot to do with that horribly grating intro before every episode here where they basically tell the audience its all about Amy.
infiniteloop said:Doctor Who has focused on the companion as much as the Doctor since the show began (An Unearthly Child), as has the new show (Rose). After almost 50 years, the show stays fresh by rotating companions and telling stories about them.
infiniteloop said:Doctor Who has focused on the companion as much as the Doctor since the show began (An Unearthly Child), as has the new show (Rose). After almost 50 years, the show stays fresh by rotating companions and telling stories about them.
brucewaynegretzky said:Are you gonna suggest that the show focused as much on Rose as it has on Amy? No way. Rose was a great character, but at no point was she the key to the entire universe like Amy was last season.
brucewaynegretzky said:Are you gonna suggest that the show focused as much on Rose as it has on Amy? No way. Rose was a great character, but at no point was she the key to the entire universe like Amy was last season.
DoctorWho said:I'd suggest it considering we got to know her family well by the end of her run. We don't even know that much about Amy's family.
Rose's story was her adventure from an average chav living on a council estate, discovering a fantastic new life and ending up with Torchwood on an alternate Earth. I'd say there was a great deal of focus on Rose.
infiniteloop said:I mean the episode not the character. That episode is very much Rose's POV. Also, I'm pretty sure Donna was the most important person in the entire universe during the fourth season.
brucewaynegretzky said:Sure, but I still get the feeling the Who is becoming "The Amy Pond Show." I never felt that way with Rose. I REALLY liked Amy last season. This season has soured me on her to the point where I'd put her down at Martha level. Martha completely redeemed herself after she stopped being a full time companion. Amy has just gotten worse and worse.
DoctorWho said:Rose
Father's Day
Parting of the Ways
The Christmas Invasion
are all very Rose-Centric episodes IMO
I'm sure there are more from the second season that I'm not thinking of as well.
I guess it comes down to just liking Amy more than you. I'm definitely seeing a focus on her character, but I don't find it distracting.
ultron87 said:Well Amy's lack of a family was a plot point in Series 5 in that the crack erased them all from existence.
Guerrillas in the Mist said:I find it odd how Rose and Donna's family were fairly important, yet we don't know much about Amy's other than her living (or having lived) with her aunt, as far as I can remember.
Guerrillas in the Mist said:Ah, forgot about that whole time crack thing.
cory. said:(spoilers for tgww) http://i.imgur.com/Nc10X.jpg
maharg said:I actually assumed the people in the Tesselacta are from the same/similar organization from the distant future human history as Jack's "time agents".
What's the evidence Kovarian's people have time travel?
The Sontarans are time travelers, naturally. Whereas the Cybermen, in general, do not.MDavis360 said:4. Who the hell has time travel technology, in total. I think The Daleks, Cybermen, The Silence, Madame Kovarian's group, Time Agents (like Captain Jack) and those people aboard The Tessalecta ALL have time travel capabilities. That's a bit messy...
ultron87 said:Well they kidnapped Amy from the present day, had her give birth at Demon's Run at some time period where the Church is in a dominant position (right?), and then brought Melody back to the 1960s to that orphanage.
maharg said:Yeah, I suppose. Though it's, of course, still possible that some established time traveller is behind them or involved with them.
I wonder if that's the same tech that allows Amy to tweet from Apalapucia.MDavis360 said:Well, they had to not only have time travel tech to kidnap Amy and bring her to Demon's Run, but also have tech that could broadcast a signal to her Flesh on the TARDIS where/whenever in time and space it was.
cory. said:I wonder if that's the same tech that allows Amy to tweet from Apalapucia.
Green Scar said:Superphone!
You could drop Amy and the Doctor and just have Rory in the Tardis and is still watch the fuck out of the show.infiniteloop said:lol
Rory is my favorite new Who companion.
maharg said:I actually assumed the people in the Tesselacta are from the same/similar organization from the distant future human history as Jack's "time agents".
What's the evidence Kovarian's people have time travel?
DoctorWho said:The only evidence we have is that Kovarian was the last person to have Melody and the next time we see her (err, the first time) she's in 60's Earth. Of course, someone else could have brought her to that time period.
MDavis360 said:At some point, they started saying that the Silence were the ones that brainwashed and kindapped Melody-but does that mean that Kovarian is working with the Silence? If The Silence is a religious movement, does that mean all those "Clerics" and Kovarian are working WITH The Silence?
ultron87 said:I'm still confused when it comes to the group referred to as the Silence and the aliens from The Impossible Astronaut. Did those aliens ever actually get called "The Silence" at any point in the show?
Or are they just some new species that happens to be working with The Silence?
maharg said:They're called Silents in the credits.
MDavis360 said:And when the Doctor confronts the wounded one in the orphanage, it says "We are the Silence."
That's been the rule of all the seasons of new Who.MDavis360 said:yeah, just sonic it-it will be fine.
This is the one thing that bugs me about Doctor Who as a whole.MDavis360 said:Additionally, one that doesn't have to be addressed immediately, but would be nice:
4. Who the hell has time travel technology, in total. I think The Daleks, Cybermen, The Silence, Madame Kovarian's group, Time Agents (like Captain Jack) and those people aboard The Tessalecta ALL have time travel capabilities. That's a bit messy...
ultron87 said:Maybe there isn't actually an alien race that looks like that. Maybe the Silence group just has access to some sort of super perception filter like technology that makes everyone see them as that race and then erases your memory.
MDavis360 said:And when the Doctor confronts the wounded one in the orphanage, it says "We are the Silence."